Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
NHL Scores and Recaps

9 games

OTT3
MTL6
Final
2.39Expected goals3.62
25Shots on goal33
42Shot attempts56
  1. C. Dvorak MTL1 G, 3 A, 2 SOG
  2. B. Gallagher MTL1 G, 2 A, 3 SOG
  3. J. Anderson MTL2 G, 2 SOG

S. Montembeault MTL22 saves on 25, the win

We had MTL at 51% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection.

CGY2
NYR1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CGY2002
NYR1001
3.07Expected goals1.67
35Shots on goal13
61Shot attempts48
  1. N. Kadri CGY1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. M. Weegar CGY2 A, 2 SOG
  3. M. Coronato CGY1 G, 5 SOG

D. Vladar CGY12 saves on 13, the win

We had NYR at 64% to win; CGY won. Shots on goal: 16 of 36 players within one of their projection.

NYI4
PIT2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NYI0044
PIT2002
3.34Expected goals2.14
38Shots on goal21
70Shot attempts65
  1. K. Palmieri NYI1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  2. N. Dobson NYI1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  3. S. Crosby PIT1 G, 5 SOG

I. Sorokin NYI19 saves on 21, the win

We had NYI at 51% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 14 of 36 players within one of their projection.

DET1
WSH4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
DET1001
WSH1034
3.17Expected goals3.59
24Shots on goal26
54Shot attempts64
  1. D. Strome WSH1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. A. Protas WSH2 A, 2 SOG
  3. D. Larkin DET1 G, 3 SOG

L. Thompson WSH23 saves on 24, the win

We had WSH at 57% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.

STL4
NSH1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
STL2114
NSH0101
2.35Expected goals1.80
21Shots on goal23
45Shot attempts52
  1. D. Holloway STL3 A, 3 SOG
  2. J. Kyrou STL2 G, 4 SOG
  3. J. Neighbours STL1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG

J. Hofer STL22 saves on 23, the win

We had STL at 50% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection.

ANA3
DAL4
Final/OT
Team1st2nd3rdOTT
ANA03003
DAL11114
3.79Expected goals3.72
25Shots on goal31
56Shot attempts66
  1. T. Harley DAL1 G, 2 A, 1 SOG
  2. M. Granlund DAL2 G, 4 SOG
  3. L. Carlsson ANA2 G, 3 SOG

J. Oettinger DAL22 saves on 25, the win

We had DAL at 67% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection.

SEA6
CHI2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
SEA1416
CHI2002
3.00Expected goals2.31
30Shots on goal29
51Shot attempts51
  1. A. Larsson SEA1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  2. S. Wright SEA2 G, 3 SOG
  3. T. Bertuzzi CHI1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG

J. Daccord SEA27 saves on 29, the win

We had SEA at 59% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 18 of 34 players within one of their projection.

UTA1
EDM7
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
UTA0101
EDM3227
2.04Expected goals5.75
30Shots on goal43
61Shot attempts72
  1. Z. Hyman EDM2 G, 1 A, 8 SOG
  2. R. Nugent-Hopkins EDM1 G, 2 A, 4 SOG
  3. C. McDavid EDM1 G, 2 A, 4 SOG

C. Pickard EDM29 saves on 30, the win

We had EDM at 57% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection.

WPG2
VAN6
Final
3.09Expected goals2.78
22Shots on goal22
65Shot attempts48
  1. B. Boeser VAN2 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. P. Suter VAN2 G, 5 SOG
  3. N. Hoglander VAN1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG

K. Lankinen VAN20 saves on 22, the win

We had WPG at 56% to win; VAN won. Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection.