Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
SEA1
FinalTue, Apr 8, 2025Every game that night
UTA7

UTA beat SEA 7-1, and the chances backed it up: 5.41 expected goals to 1.80. UTA outshot SEA 41 to 19. M. Sergachev led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). L. Crouse had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.4. K. Vejmelka stopped 18 of 19.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
SEA0011
UTA3407
  1. 1st 2:44UTAM. Sergachev0.11 xG
  2. 1st 12:54UTAC. KellerPP0.13 xG
  3. 1st 16:28UTAK. YamamotoPP0.15 xG
  4. 2nd 0:16UTAL. Crouse0.04 xG
  5. 2nd 11:15UTAL. Cooley0.07 xG
  6. 2nd 16:05UTAN. SchmaltzPP0.53 xG
  7. 2nd 18:07UTAM. Carcone0.01 xG
  8. 3rd 0:23SEAJ. McCannPP0.23 xG

Team Stats

SEAUTA
19Shots on goal41
1.80Expected goals5.41
47Shot attempts70
165v5 shots on goal29
1/4Power play3/6
22Hits17
12Blocked shots16
19Penalty minutes15
21Giveaways11
5Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

SEA 1.80 xGUTA 5.41 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdUTA goal, 2:44UTA goal, 12:54UTA goal, 16:28UTA goal, 0:16UTA goal, 11:15UTA goal, 16:05UTA goal, 18:07SEA goal, 0:23

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

SEA18 on goal, 1 scored
UTA41 on goal, 7 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

SEA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. McCannLW101211-2017:493:06
A. BurakovskyLW011100-2013:383:12
C. StephensonC0000020018:291:43
M. BeniersC0000310018:111:43
J. SchwartzLW0001100016:432:54
S. WrightC000100-2014:383:04
E. TolvanenRW0000210014:000:00
J. EberleRW0002000213:551:55
K. KakkoRW0002100013:541:39
M. EyssimontC000120-2012:110:00
R. WintertonC000230-2211:150:00
T. KartyeLW000020-2510:180:00
V. DunnD0113000020:342:52
B. MontourD000201-3220:311:57
A. LarssonD0001020020:100:00
J. MahuraD000052-1017:570:00
J. OleksiakD000111-1417:310:00
R. EvansD000011-3417:260:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Daccord29227.75939:37Loss
V. Ostman121201.00020:00

UTA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
D. GuentherRW033502+1219:105:12
C. KellerRW112401+1019:385:16
L. CooleyC112410+1017:192:16
K. StenlundC022000+2016:380:11
N. SchmaltzC1013000015:575:07
K. YamamotoRW1012100014:082:17
J. DoanRW011400+1012:282:19
M. CarconeLW101201+2011:060:02
L. CrouseLW101432+159:540:00
B. HaytonC0004100018:294:04
J. McBainC000232+1013:292:14
N. BjugstadC000011+2211:050:06
M. SergachevD123231+3220:014:46
S. DurziD011011+3020:482:46
M. KesselringD011101+1217:170:02
O. MaattaD0002010019:190:00
I. ColeD000122+1219:080:02
N. DeSimoneD0001110016:000:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
K. Vejmelka19181.94759:43Win
M. Villalta000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreSEA 2.9, UTA 3.5SEA 1, UTA 7
Total goals6.48
Shots on goalSEA 26.4, UTA 29.8SEA 19, UTA 41
Win chanceUTA 59%UTA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
UTA D. Guenther2.950.83331%0
UTA C. Keller2.641.01231%1
SEA J. McCann2.320.65126%1
SEA B. Montour2.220.43014%0
UTA L. Cooley2.140.77227%1
UTA N. Schmaltz2.030.76123%1
SEA J. Schwartz2.010.46020%0
UTA B. Hayton1.940.53019%0
SEA V. Dunn1.830.54112%0
SEA E. Tolvanen1.800.45021%0
SEA M. Beniers1.700.52021%0
UTA M. Sergachev1.720.65312%1
SEA J. Eberle1.620.53020%0
SEA M. Eyssimont1.610.2009%0
UTA J. Doan1.540.42115%0
UTA S. Durzi1.500.48110%0
UTA N. Bjugstad1.500.33015%0
UTA M. Kesselring1.510.3016%0
UTA L. Crouse1.440.31117%1
UTA M. Carcone1.420.38118%1
SEA K. Kakko1.420.43017%0
SEA A. Burakovsky1.410.41114%0
SEA A. Larsson1.310.2807%0
UTA K. Stenlund1.300.32216%0
SEA S. Wright1.210.51020%0
UTA N. DeSimone1.110.2606%0
UTA J. McBain1.120.38015%0
UTA K. Yamamoto1.120.34114%1
SEA R. Winterton1.020.1307%0
SEA C. Stephenson1.000.61018%0
SEA J. Mahura0.900.1703%0
SEA T. Kartye0.900.1709%0
SEA J. Oleksiak0.810.1804%0
UTA O. Maatta0.820.2304%0
SEA R. Evans0.800.2705%0
UTA I. Cole0.810.2103%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.