Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
SJS3
Final/SOTue, Apr 1, 2025Every game that night
ANA4

ANA beat SJS 4-3 in a shootout, and the chances backed it up: 5.07 expected goals to 3.17. M. McTavish led the way with 3 points (0 G, 3 A). M. McTavish had 11 shots on goal against our projection of 2.5. L. Dostal stopped 28 of 31.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdSOT
SJS10203
ANA30014
  1. 1st 2:04ANAT. Zegras0.02 xG
  2. 1st 5:28SJSS. Mukhamadullin0.01 xG
  3. 1st 8:13ANAJ. LaCombePP0.03 xG
  4. 1st 19:01ANAS. Colangelo0.29 xG
  5. 3rd 4:08SJSM. Vlasic0.10 xG
  6. 3rd 16:46SJSA. Wennberg0.14 xG

Team Stats

SJSANA
31Shots on goal37
3.17Expected goals5.07
66Shot attempts73
265v5 shots on goal25
0/2Power play1/4
16Hits24
15Blocked shots13
10Penalty minutes6
13Giveaways9
4Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

SJS 3.17 xGANA 5.07 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdOTANA goal, 2:04SJS goal, 5:28ANA goal, 8:13ANA goal, 19:01SJS goal, 4:08SJS goal, 16:46

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

SJS31 on goal, 3 scored
ANA37 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

SJS Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. WennbergC101114+2020:002:05
W. EklundLW011830+2018:022:05
T. DellandreaC011010-1012:020:00
W. SmithC0004010225:072:16
M. CelebriniC0003010224:452:05
T. ToffoliC0002100021:232:05
C. GrafRW000010+2016:060:41
C. LundC000100-1211:580:41
B. GoodrowC0001010211:140:00
C. GrundstromRW000240-1010:390:00
N. GregorLW000120007:230:00
Z. OstapchukC000010007:140:00
M. FerraroD011002+1026:420:00
J. ThompsonD0112010015:400:41
M. VlasicD101101+1015:200:00
S. MukhamadullinD1014100215:160:41
L. CarlssonD0001130023:460:00
T. LiljegrenD0000010023:290:46
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Georgiev37343.91964:42OT loss
G. Romanov000–0:00

ANA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. McTavishC0331120+1020:335:28
T. ZegrasC1123100016:451:36
S. ColangeloRW112100+1013:591:36
L. CarlssonC0002000021:245:29
T. TerryRW0003000021:103:52
R. StromeC0002300017:452:00
F. VatranoRW000320+1217:230:39
A. KillornLW0001000014:560:00
C. GauthierLW0001110012:360:00
I. LundestromC000101-2011:230:08
J. HarkinsC000050-2011:110:00
N. NesterenkoC000050-2010:270:07
J. LaCombeD1013140031:045:30
R. GudasD011211+1023:000:00
O. ZellwegerD000201-2218:460:06
J. TroubaD000205-2018:260:08
D. HellesonD0000100215:020:00
P. MintyukovD000020+1013:100:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
L. Dostal31283.90365:00Win
J. Gibson000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamJacob Trouba SJS First game back in Anaheim, his team until May 20262 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreSJS 3.0, ANA 3.6SJS 3, ANA 4
Total goals6.67
Shots on goalSJS 28.9, ANA 30.9SJS 31, ANA 37
Win chanceANA 59%ANA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
SJS M. Celebrini3.330.84026%0
SJS T. Toffoli3.120.76032%0
ANA F. Vatrano2.830.67030%0
ANA M. McTavish2.5110.85330%0
ANA T. Terry2.430.87030%0
ANA C. Gauthier2.310.63021%0
ANA T. Zegras2.230.82226%1
ANA A. Killorn2.010.66027%0
ANA O. Zellweger2.020.43010%0
SJS W. Smith1.940.66020%0
SJS W. Eklund1.980.73121%0
ANA L. Carlsson1.820.74027%0
ANA J. LaCombe1.730.72114%1
ANA S. Colangelo1.710.49225%1
ANA R. Strome1.720.61018%0
SJS C. Grundstrom1.720.24013%0
SJS T. Liljegren1.600.3308%0
ANA N. Nesterenko1.600.33018%0
ANA J. Trouba1.520.3507%0
SJS C. Graf1.400.45017%0
SJS L. Carlsson1.310.3008%0
SJS J. Thompson1.320.2117%0
SJS S. Mukhamadullin1.340.3416%1
ANA D. Helleson1.300.35010%0
SJS N. Gregor1.310.20010%0
SJS M. Ferraro1.200.2316%0
SJS A. Wennberg1.210.49115%1
ANA R. Gudas1.220.3015%0
ANA P. Mintyukov1.000.3807%0
SJS M. Vlasic1.010.1915%1
SJS B. Goodrow1.010.23012%0
SJS T. Dellandrea1.000.2119%0
ANA J. Harkins1.000.1909%0
ANA I. Lundestrom0.810.25011%0
SJS Z. Ostapchuk0.500.1207%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.