Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
SJS5
Final/OTMon, Oct 28, 2024Every game that night
UTA4

SJS beat UTA 5-4 in overtime, and the chances backed it up: 4.69 expected goals to 2.33. SJS outshot UTA 46 to 23. M. Granlund led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). T. Toffoli had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 2.5. M. Blackwood stopped 19 of 23.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdOTT
SJS01315
UTA22004
  1. 1st 11:00UTAD. Guenther0.14 xG
  2. 1st 16:24UTAM. Maccelli0.27 xG
  3. 2nd 9:12SJSF. Zetterlund0.16 xG
  4. 2nd 10:38UTAM. Maccelli0.17 xG
  5. 2nd 19:36UTAM. Sergachev0.03 xG
  6. 3rd 15:28SJSF. Zetterlund0.18 xG
  7. 3rd 15:53SJSM. Granlund0.04 xG
  8. 3rd 17:18SJST. Toffoli0.24 xG
  9. OT 1:26SJSA. WennbergPP0.66 xG

Team Stats

SJSUTA
46Shots on goal23
4.69Expected goals2.33
78Shot attempts55
345v5 shots on goal20
1/4Power play0/2
29Hits21
14Blocked shots18
9Penalty minutes13
8Giveaways15
6Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

SJS 4.69 xGUTA 2.33 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdOTUTA goal, 11:00UTA goal, 16:24SJS goal, 9:12UTA goal, 10:38UTA goal, 19:36SJS goal, 15:28SJS goal, 15:53SJS goal, 17:18SJS goal, 1:26

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

SJS44 on goal, 5 scored
UTA22 on goal, 4 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

SJS Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. GranlundC123320+2022:404:05
A. WennbergC112600+4021:234:07
T. ToffoliC112800+3219:304:06
F. ZetterlundLW202330+4017:092:00
W. EklundLW011120+2023:314:07
D. GushchinLW011201+1016:021:46
B. GoodrowC000222-2018:171:59
L. KuninC000220-2018:062:02
C. GrundstromRW000020-1210:420:00
N. SturmC000001-209:370:01
K. KostinC000020-205:340:00
G. SmithRW000201-153:420:00
J. WalmanD033411+2024:004:09
H. ThrunD011122-1015:131:50
C. CeciD000461-2024:260:15
M. FerraroD000331-1023:360:01
J. RuttaD000323-1016:200:00
M. BenningD0002010011:180:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
M. Blackwood23194.82660:45Win
V. Vanecek000–0:00

UTA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. MaccelliLW202300+1013:571:47
D. GuentherRW101310+2219:462:11
C. KellerRW011200+2018:582:16
L. CooleyC011200+2218:261:45
N. SchmaltzC011210+1017:042:29
L. CrouseLW000222-1016:021:25
B. HaytonC000020+1015:272:07
A. KerfootC000001-1015:060:00
K. StenlundC000022-3013:300:06
N. BjugstadC000230-1213:171:40
J. McBainC000022-2011:440:04
L. O'BrienC000030-157:120:02
I. ColeD022204+1022:050:08
V. KolyachonokD022021+1015:400:00
M. SergachevD101401-1026:352:27
M. KesselringD000110-1222:421:25
M. LamoureuxD000011+1017:520:08
R. BortuzzoD000014-1012:550:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Ingram46415.89161:26OT loss
K. Vejmelka000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreSJS 2.7, UTA 4.0SJS 5, UTA 4
Total goals6.79
Shots on goalSJS 25.8, UTA 33.1SJS 46, UTA 23
Win chanceUTA 70%SJS won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
UTA C. Keller3.121.23139%0
UTA D. Guenther2.730.89132%1
SJS T. Toffoli2.580.73230%1
UTA B. Hayton2.300.62023%0
UTA N. Bjugstad2.220.62026%0
UTA M. Sergachev2.240.84111%1
UTA N. Schmaltz2.121.02129%0
SJS M. Granlund2.030.81317%1
SJS F. Zetterlund2.030.48219%2
UTA L. Cooley1.920.66123%0
UTA L. Crouse1.920.58026%0
SJS J. Walman1.940.33315%0
UTA M. Kesselring1.710.55011%0
SJS W. Eklund1.710.64119%0
UTA M. Maccelli1.530.69217%2
UTA A. Kerfoot1.400.58017%0
SJS C. Grundstrom1.200.22012%0
UTA K. Stenlund1.200.22015%0
SJS D. Gushchin1.220.31113%0
SJS C. Ceci1.240.2906%0
SJS L. Kunin1.120.26014%0
SJS M. Ferraro1.030.2105%0
UTA L. O'Brien1.000.2208%0
SJS A. Wennberg1.060.39213%1
UTA I. Cole1.020.2625%0
SJS B. Goodrow1.020.29012%0
UTA J. McBain0.900.44015%0
SJS J. Rutta0.930.2607%0
SJS N. Sturm0.800.2109%0
SJS G. Smith0.820.1406%0
UTA V. Kolyachonok0.800.2426%0
SJS H. Thrun0.710.1915%0
SJS K. Kostin0.700.27013%0
SJS M. Benning0.720.2002%0
UTA R. Bortuzzo0.600.1103%0

Shots on goal: 17 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.