Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
STL4
FinalSat, Jan 4, 2025Every game that night
CBJ6

CBJ beat STL 6-4, with the chances close: 3.69 expected goals to 4.19. J. Kyrou led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). Z. Werenski had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 3.5. E. Merzlikins stopped 29 of 33.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
STL0044
CBJ1146
  1. 1st 19:01CBJD. Voronkov0.13 xG
  2. 2nd 2:15CBJK. MarchenkoPP0.15 xG
  3. 3rd 3:44CBJM. PyyhtiaSH0.22 xG
  4. 3rd 4:54STLJ. KyrouPP0.11 xG
  5. 3rd 5:25CBJA. Fantilli0.14 xG
  6. 3rd 6:55STLC. Fowler0.16 xG
  7. 3rd 7:24CBJD. Voronkov0.17 xG
  8. 3rd 12:54STLC. Parayko0.06 xG
  9. 3rd 16:16STLB. Schenn0.40 xG
  10. 3rd 18:59CBJM. OlivierEN0.40 xG

Team Stats

STLCBJ
33Shots on goal39
4.19Expected goals3.69
68Shot attempts68
275v5 shots on goal31
1/2Power play1/2
21Hits14
18Blocked shots24
9Penalty minutes9
14Giveaways15
3Takeaways9

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

STL 4.19 xGCBJ 3.69 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdCBJ goal, 19:01CBJ goal, 2:15CBJ goal, 3:44STL goal, 4:54CBJ goal, 5:25STL goal, 6:55CBJ goal, 7:24STL goal, 12:54STL goal, 16:16CBJ goal, 18:59

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

STL31 on goal, 4 scored
CBJ39 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

STL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. KyrouRW1235110019:282:02
D. HollowayLW0224310018:332:05
B. SchennC1012100018:322:07
P. BuchnevichLW0111100018:261:14
J. NeighboursLW0113110014:591:52
A. TexierLW011011+1012:220:00
R. ThomasC000101-1016:471:16
B. SaadLW000202-1215:231:19
O. SundqvistC0002220014:541:14
N. WalkerLW000130-2012:270:00
A. ToropchenkoRW000120-2011:050:00
M. JosephRW000200-2010:460:00
C. FowlerD112403-2022:531:16
C. ParaykoD101132-1025:180:13
P. BrobergD0003130022:270:00
R. SuterD0001010020:390:15
S. PerunovichD0000000015:361:52
T. TuckerD000020078:430:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Hofer38335.86858:27Loss
J. Binnington000–0:00

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
S. MonahanC033101+2023:422:09
D. VoronkovLW202512+3021:402:10
K. MarchenkoRW101501+3021:282:13
C. SillingerC011300-1018:460:02
K. JohnsonC011100-2017:462:09
M. OlivierRW1014520716:510:00
A. FantilliC101223+1012:260:06
M. PyyhtiaLW101110+108:520:00
J. van RiemsdykLW000401-1013:310:05
Z. Aston-ReeseLW0002010213:260:00
S. KuralyC000110-1010:350:00
I. ProvorovD0332020023:390:06
Z. WerenskiD022704+2029:012:09
D. FabbroD011124+1023:110:00
J. HarrisD011010+104:320:00
D. MateychukD000012-2016:550:06
J. JohnsonD000001+2011:160:00
J. ChristiansenD000000009:140:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Merzlikins33294.87959:48Win
D. Tarasov000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreSTL 3.2, CBJ 3.3STL 4, CBJ 6
Total goals6.510
Shots on goalSTL 27.9, CBJ 30.5STL 33, CBJ 39
Win chanceCBJ 51%CBJ won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CBJ Z. Werenski3.570.88218%0
CBJ K. Marchenko3.150.89134%1
STL J. Kyrou2.750.85333%1
CBJ S. Monahan2.510.86328%0
CBJ D. Voronkov2.550.76232%2
CBJ C. Sillinger2.330.49118%0
STL D. Holloway2.240.58225%0
STL P. Buchnevich2.110.84129%0
CBJ K. Johnson1.910.64123%0
STL R. Thomas1.911.02026%0
CBJ A. Fantilli1.920.48119%1
STL B. Schenn1.820.62122%1
STL C. Parayko1.710.4019%1
STL J. Neighbours1.630.47124%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.520.32015%0
STL B. Saad1.520.48023%0
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.540.45018%0
STL C. Fowler1.340.4829%1
CBJ D. Fabbro1.310.2616%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.340.38116%1
STL A. Texier1.300.37115%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.220.3738%0
STL P. Broberg1.230.3507%0
STL M. Joseph1.120.32011%0
STL A. Toropchenko1.110.24012%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.010.26012%0
STL N. Walker1.010.29013%0
STL O. Sundqvist0.920.33013%0
CBJ M. Pyyhtia0.910.1919%1
STL R. Suter0.810.2104%0
CBJ D. Mateychuk0.800.2305%0
STL T. Tucker0.600.1003%0
CBJ J. Christiansen0.600.1102%0
CBJ J. Johnson0.600.0902%0
STL S. Perunovich0.500.2703%0
CBJ J. Harris0.500.1414%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.