EDM beat STL 5-0, and the chances backed it up: 3.56 expected goals to 2.81. Z. Hyman led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). C. Ingram stopped 27 of 27.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EDM | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
- 1st 5:55EDMR. Nugent-HopkinsPP0.11 xG
- 1st 11:52EDMA. Mangiapane0.28 xG
- 1st 18:43EDMZ. Hyman0.33 xG
- 2nd 10:52EDMZ. Hyman0.12 xG
- 3rd 1:19EDMV. Podkolzin0.34 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
STL 2.81 xGEDM 3.56 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
STL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Schenn | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 17:56 | 3:56 |
| J. Snuggerud | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:37 | 3:50 |
| J. Neighbours | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:36 | 3:48 |
| P. Buchnevich | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 16:35 | 3:46 |
| J. Kyrou | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:51 | 3:56 |
| D. Dvorsky | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:12 | 3:10 |
| O. Stenberg | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:49 | 1:20 |
| N. Bjugstad | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 14:40 | 0:56 |
| A. Toropchenko | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:20 | 0:23 |
| N. Walker | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13:15 | 0:25 |
| D. Holloway | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 12:45 | 3:13 |
| O. Sundqvist | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:27 | 2:14 |
| P. Broberg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 25:27 | 3:16 |
| J. Faulk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:43 | 3:53 |
| C. Parayko | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 19:52 | 0:38 |
| C. Fowler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:49 | 1:08 |
| L. Mailloux | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:35 | 0:04 |
| T. Tucker | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 13:54 | 0:04 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Binnington | 28 | 23 | 5 | .821 | 60:00 | Loss |
| J. Hofer | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z. Hyman | LW | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 17:59 | 2:51 |
| C. McDavid | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 22:42 | 3:09 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 14:05 | 0:03 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:20 | 2:50 |
| A. Mangiapane | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 10:19 | 0:00 |
| C. Lazar | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 9:31 | 0:00 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18:18 | 0:29 |
| M. Janmark | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:46 | 0:00 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:14 | 0:47 |
| I. Howard | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:48 | 0:47 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:14 | 0:03 |
| K. Kapanen | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2:53 | 0:03 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +3 | 2 | 19:02 | 0:48 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +3 | 4 | 21:05 | 2:56 |
| J. Walman | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 18:54 | 2:51 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23:04 | 0:42 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 20:52 | 0:03 |
| S. Stastney | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 17:54 | 0:03 |
Lines at 5-on-5
STL
EDM
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | STL 3.0, EDM 3.4 | STL 0, EDM 5 |
| Total goals | 6.4 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | STL 24.1, EDM 30.2 | STL 27, EDM 28 |
| Win chance | EDM 57% | EDM won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.5 | 4 | 1.53 | 2 | 38% | 0 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 3.0 | 4 | 0.81 | 3 | 38% | 2 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.9 | 2 | 0.99 | 1 | 18% | 0 |
| STL J. Kyrou | 2.5 | 0 | 0.69 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| STL D. Holloway | 2.2 | 3 | 0.63 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| STL J. Snuggerud | 2.2 | 3 | 0.50 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 2.1 | 2 | 0.37 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 1.9 | 3 | 0.81 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.8 | 1 | 0.44 | 2 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM J. Walman | 1.8 | 3 | 0.44 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 1.8 | 2 | 0.46 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| STL P. Buchnevich | 1.7 | 1 | 0.65 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| STL N. Bjugstad | 1.6 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| STL J. Faulk | 1.6 | 2 | 0.42 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM K. Kapanen | 1.6 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| STL B. Schenn | 1.6 | 3 | 0.57 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| STL J. Neighbours | 1.5 | 0 | 0.58 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.4 | 2 | 0.38 | 2 | 15% | 1 |
| STL D. Dvorsky | 1.3 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| STL C. Parayko | 1.3 | 2 | 0.34 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| EDM I. Howard | 1.2 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.2 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| STL C. Fowler | 1.1 | 1 | 0.44 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| STL A. Toropchenko | 1.1 | 2 | 0.25 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| STL P. Broberg | 1.1 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| STL N. Walker | 1.0 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| EDM S. Stastney | 1.0 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| STL O. Sundqvist | 1.0 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| STL T. Tucker | 0.9 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| STL O. Stenberg | 0.9 | 1 | 0.43 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| STL L. Mailloux | 0.9 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 0.9 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| EDM A. Mangiapane | 0.8 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 12% | 1 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.8 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| EDM M. Janmark | 0.6 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM C. Lazar | 0.6 | 1 | 0.15 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 28 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.