PHI beat STL 3-2 in overtime, with the chances close: 3.04 expected goals to 2.63. J. Faulk led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). B. Schenn had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. D. Vladar stopped 27 of 29.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| PHI | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
- 1st 5:31STLJ. Faulk0.02 xG
- 1st 12:08STLJ. FaulkPP0.15 xG
- 2nd 17:57PHIR. Abols0.17 xG
- 3rd 11:49PHIT. Foerster0.05 xG
- OT 3:51PHIT. Sanheim0.19 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
STL 2.63 xGPHI 3.04 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
STL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Kyrou | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:58 | 1:38 |
| J. Neighbours | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:13 | 1:08 |
| O. Sundqvist | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:20 | 0:00 |
| N. Walker | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 10:41 | 0:00 |
| P. Buchnevich | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:04 | 1:29 |
| R. Thomas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:35 | 1:32 |
| B. Schenn | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:06 | 1:37 |
| D. Dvorsky | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:00 | 1:14 |
| J. Snuggerud | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:44 | 1:57 |
| D. Holloway | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:33 | 1:35 |
| P. Suter | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 14:42 | 0:00 |
| A. Toropchenko | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:15 | 0:00 |
| J. Faulk | D | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 24:59 | 1:08 |
| P. Broberg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 26:07 | 0:09 |
| C. Parayko | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 25:26 | 0:14 |
| C. Fowler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23:15 | 1:49 |
| T. Tucker | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 11:19 | 0:00 |
| M. Kessel | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:16 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Hofer | 28 | 25 | 3 | .893 | 63:51 | OT loss |
| J. Binnington | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 20:19 | 2:02 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20:25 | 1:58 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:03 | 1:58 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:29 | 2:02 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:17 | 2:02 |
| R. Abols | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 10:20 | 0:00 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:57 | 0:00 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:17 | 1:58 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:57 | 1:58 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:56 | 2:02 |
| N. Deslauriers | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:16 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:23 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 26:13 | 0:00 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 19:30 | 0:00 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24:59 | 2:02 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 21:03 | 1:58 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15:45 | 0:00 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:23 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
STL
PHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | STL 3.1, PHI 2.8 | STL 2, PHI 3 |
| Total goals | 5.9 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | STL 23.5, PHI 26.2 | STL 29, PHI 28 |
| Win chance | STL 54% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.5 | 1 | 0.62 | 1 | 26% | 0 |
| STL J. Kyrou | 2.3 | 4 | 0.72 | 1 | 30% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.2 | 2 | 0.81 | 2 | 28% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.1 | 1 | 0.64 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.0 | 4 | 0.76 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| STL D. Holloway | 2.0 | 0 | 0.66 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.9 | 0 | 0.58 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 1.9 | 3 | 0.56 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| STL J. Snuggerud | 1.8 | 1 | 0.56 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| STL P. Buchnevich | 1.7 | 3 | 0.73 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.6 | 2 | 0.54 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.6 | 1 | 0.56 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| STL J. Faulk | 1.5 | 3 | 0.49 | 2 | 10% | 2 |
| STL C. Parayko | 1.5 | 1 | 0.45 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| STL P. Suter | 1.5 | 1 | 0.51 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| STL R. Thomas | 1.5 | 1 | 0.94 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.5 | 3 | 0.52 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.5 | 4 | 0.38 | 1 | 9% | 1 |
| STL P. Broberg | 1.4 | 2 | 0.43 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| STL B. Schenn | 1.3 | 8 | 0.57 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| STL C. Fowler | 1.3 | 1 | 0.59 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| STL J. Neighbours | 1.2 | 1 | 0.56 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.2 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| STL D. Dvorsky | 1.2 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.1 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.0 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI R. Abols | 1.0 | 4 | 0.18 | 1 | 9% | 1 |
| STL A. Toropchenko | 1.0 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| STL N. Walker | 1.0 | 2 | 0.30 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 1.0 | 2 | 0.14 | 1 | 2% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.9 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| STL O. Sundqvist | 0.8 | 0 | 0.33 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI N. Deslauriers | 0.8 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.7 | 0 | 0.10 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| STL T. Tucker | 0.6 | 1 | 0.16 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| STL M. Kessel | 0.5 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.