Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
TBL5
FinalWed, Oct 30, 2024Every game that night
COL2

TBL beat COL 5-2, with the chances close: 3.09 expected goals to 2.82. COL outshot TBL 35 to 21. N. Kucherov led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). I. Ivan had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.2. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 33 of 35.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
TBL3115
COL1012
  1. 1st 1:01TBLN. Kucherov0.07 xG
  2. 1st 3:36TBLJ. Guentzel0.13 xG
  3. 1st 5:32TBLC. Geekie0.23 xG
  4. 1st 14:56COLI. IvanPP0.05 xG
  5. 2nd 6:28TBLJ. Guentzel0.28 xG
  6. 3rd 10:57COLC. Makar0.02 xG
  7. 3rd 18:40TBLA. CirelliEN0.93 xG

Team Stats

TBLCOL
21Shots on goal35
3.09Expected goals2.82
44Shot attempts68
175v5 shots on goal27
0/3Power play1/4
12Hits24
17Blocked shots11
15Penalty minutes24
18Giveaways9
2Takeaways1

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

TBL 3.09 xGCOL 2.82 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdTBL goal, 1:01TBL goal, 3:36TBL goal, 5:32COL goal, 14:56TBL goal, 6:28COL goal, 10:57TBL goal, 18:40

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

TBL19 on goal, 5 scored
COL34 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

TBL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. KucherovRW123201+2016:364:11
B. HagelLW022300+1021:254:47
A. CirelliC112200+1219:151:52
J. GuentzelC202302+3018:344:54
B. PointC022000+3018:104:44
C. GeekieC101210+1010:542:00
N. PaulLW000110+1017:342:00
M. ChaffeeRW0000000015:260:56
M. EyssimontC0001210511:240:00
C. AtkinsonRW0000000210:532:00
L. GlendeningC000021009:280:00
Z. GirgensonsC000010007:570:00
V. HedmanD011223+2025:224:00
R. McDonaghD011102+2019:280:00
J. MoserD000213+3024:521:37
D. RaddyshD000013+1018:451:14
E. LillebergD000010-1413:050:00
E. CernakD000201+1212:060:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Vasilevskiy35332.94360:00Win
J. Johansson000–0:00

COL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. MacKinnonC0222120024:586:01
M. RantanenRW0112000224:376:34
I. IvanC101600-2018:115:59
C. MittelstadtC000300-1021:396:11
L. O'ConnorRW0000010017:340:37
J. KivirantaLW000332+1015:220:00
P. KellyC000241-3015:000:00
N. KovalenkoRW000010-2012:060:26
C. WagnerRW000251-2511:390:00
T. TynanC000110-108:360:03
M. StienburgC000120-1174:060:00
C. MakarD1126300025:306:09
D. ToewsD000310-2023:360:29
S. GirardD0000210019:580:36
J. MansonD000112-2015:440:00
C. de HaanD000200-2014:500:00
S. MalinskiD000101-2013:470:00
O. KylingtonD000000-205:310:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
K. Kahkonen20164.80058:16Loss
A. Georgiev000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • BirthdayCale Makar COL Turns 26 that day1 G, 1 A, 6 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreTBL 3.3, COL 3.8TBL 5, COL 2
Total goals7.17
Shots on goalTBL 27.4, COL 32.6TBL 21, COL 35
Win chanceCOL 57%TBL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
COL N. MacKinnon4.621.63243%0
COL M. Rantanen3.321.35141%0
TBL N. Kucherov3.021.46334%1
TBL J. Guentzel2.930.94233%2
COL C. Makar2.761.13224%1
TBL B. Point2.501.03239%0
COL C. Mittelstadt2.130.90024%0
TBL V. Hedman2.120.81112%0
TBL B. Hagel2.130.84228%0
COL D. Toews1.830.60012%0
TBL M. Eyssimont1.710.27011%0
COL J. Manson1.610.37010%0
TBL N. Paul1.610.47019%0
COL L. O'Connor1.600.42016%0
TBL A. Cirelli1.520.56219%1
COL O. Kylington1.500.33010%0
TBL C. Atkinson1.300.27012%0
COL P. Kelly1.320.25011%0
COL N. Kovalenko1.300.40014%0
COL S. Malinski1.310.3607%0
COL I. Ivan1.260.32112%1
COL S. Girard1.100.3906%0
COL C. Haan1.120.1905%0
TBL Z. Girgensons1.100.20011%0
COL J. Kiviranta1.130.25011%0
TBL D. Raddysh1.100.3205%0
TBL C. Geekie1.020.29113%1
TBL R. McDonagh1.010.3414%0
TBL J. Moser1.020.3607%0
COL C. Wagner0.920.1107%0
TBL M. Chaffee0.900.29014%0
TBL E. Cernak0.820.2303%0
TBL L. Glendening0.800.1208%0
TBL E. Lilleberg0.700.1502%0
COL M. Stienburg0.510.1106%0

Shots on goal: 17 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.