TBL beat DET 6-3, and the chances backed it up: 4.85 expected goals to 3.75. DET outshot TBL 37 to 27. D. Raddysh led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). B. Chiarot had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 34 of 37.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| DET | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
- 1st 11:29DETJ. Compher0.08 xG
- 1st 17:07TBLD. RaddyshPP0.10 xG
- 2nd 0:34TBLG. Goncalves0.20 xG
- 2nd 3:01TBLY. Gourde0.33 xG
- 2nd 3:13DETM. Rasmussen0.13 xG
- 2nd 16:09TBLY. Gourde0.11 xG
- 2nd 18:26DETD. Larkin0.07 xG
- 3rd 12:37TBLJ. Guentzel0.11 xG
- 3rd 17:13TBLB. HagelEN0.90 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
TBL 4.85 xGDET 3.75 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
TBL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Kucherov | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 19:40 | 0:36 |
| J. Guentzel | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:05 | 0:36 |
| Y. Gourde | C | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 16:21 | 0:00 |
| B. Hagel | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 15:19 | 0:00 |
| O. Bjorkstrand | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:09 | 0:36 |
| N. Paul | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:00 | 0:36 |
| G. Goncalves | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 11:29 | 0:00 |
| Z. Girgensons | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:54 | 0:00 |
| A. Cirelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:54 | 0:00 |
| P. Holmberg | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:16 | 0:00 |
| D. James | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:56 | 0:00 |
| C. Douglas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5:25 | 0:00 |
| D. Raddysh | D | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 24:04 | 0:36 |
| J. Moser | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 23:59 | 0:00 |
| E. Lilleberg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 23:30 | 0:00 |
| C. D'Astous | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:56 | 0:00 |
| S. Santini | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:04 | 0:00 |
| D. Carlile | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:59 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Vasilevskiy | 37 | 34 | 3 | .919 | 60:00 | Win |
| J. Johansson | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
DET Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Compher | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:01 | 0:00 |
| M. Rasmussen | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:01 | 0:00 |
| D. Larkin | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19:18 | 2:00 |
| L. Raymond | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:37 | 2:00 |
| A. DeBrincat | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 2 | 18:59 | 2:00 |
| E. Finnie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:55 | 0:00 |
| P. Kane | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 16:12 | 1:54 |
| M. Appleton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:58 | 0:00 |
| M. Kasper | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:07 | 0:00 |
| J. van Riemsdyk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 12:38 | 0:00 |
| A. Copp | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:10 | 0:00 |
| N. Danielson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 10:40 | 0:00 |
| S. Edvinsson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:49 | 0:00 |
| B. Chiarot | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 23:43 | 0:06 |
| M. Seider | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:57 | 2:00 |
| A. Sandin-Pellikka | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22:10 | 0:00 |
| A. Johansson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 14:45 | 0:00 |
| J. Bernard-Docker | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 14:02 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
TBL
DET
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | TBL 3.2, DET 3.1 | TBL 6, DET 3 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 9 |
| Shots on goal | TBL 25.1, DET 29.4 | TBL 27, DET 37 |
| Win chance | TBL 51% | TBL won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET A. DeBrincat | 3.3 | 3 | 0.84 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| DET D. Larkin | 3.1 | 3 | 0.95 | 1 | 35% | 1 |
| TBL J. Guentzel | 2.7 | 1 | 1.06 | 2 | 39% | 1 |
| TBL N. Kucherov | 2.7 | 4 | 1.39 | 2 | 34% | 0 |
| DET P. Kane | 2.6 | 4 | 0.77 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| DET L. Raymond | 2.4 | 1 | 0.89 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| TBL B. Hagel | 2.4 | 5 | 0.92 | 1 | 30% | 1 |
| DET M. Seider | 2.1 | 3 | 0.49 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| TBL N. Paul | 1.9 | 1 | 0.56 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| TBL D. Raddysh | 1.8 | 3 | 0.61 | 3 | 10% | 1 |
| TBL O. Bjorkstrand | 1.7 | 0 | 0.58 | 1 | 21% | 0 |
| DET E. Finnie | 1.6 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| TBL A. Cirelli | 1.6 | 1 | 0.64 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| DET M. Kasper | 1.5 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| TBL Y. Gourde | 1.4 | 4 | 0.47 | 2 | 15% | 2 |
| DET B. Chiarot | 1.3 | 5 | 0.21 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| DET J. Riemsdyk | 1.2 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| DET S. Edvinsson | 1.2 | 1 | 0.32 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| DET J. Compher | 1.2 | 3 | 0.35 | 2 | 15% | 1 |
| TBL D. James | 1.1 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| DET M. Appleton | 1.1 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| TBL Z. Girgensons | 1.1 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| DET A. Sandin-Pellikka | 1.1 | 2 | 0.26 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| DET N. Danielson | 1.1 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| DET M. Rasmussen | 1.1 | 3 | 0.27 | 2 | 12% | 1 |
| DET A. Copp | 1.0 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| TBL J. Moser | 1.0 | 2 | 0.32 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL C. D'Astous | 0.9 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| TBL P. Holmberg | 0.9 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| TBL G. Goncalves | 0.9 | 1 | 0.35 | 1 | 12% | 1 |
| DET A. Johansson | 0.9 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL S. Santini | 0.8 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| DET J. Bernard-Docker | 0.8 | 3 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL E. Lilleberg | 0.8 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL D. Carlile | 0.6 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| TBL C. Douglas | 0.5 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.