Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
TBL5
FinalSat, Mar 21, 2026Every game that night
EDM2

TBL beat EDM 5-2, with the chances close: 2.92 expected goals to 2.52. N. Kucherov led the way with 4 points (2 G, 2 A). N. Kucherov had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 2.7. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 26 of 27.

Team Stats

TBLEDM
28Shots on goal27
2.92Expected goals2.52
60Shot attempts51
215v5 shots on goal23
1/3Power play0/3
11Hits28
13Blocked shots17
18Penalty minutes18
19Giveaways17
5Takeaways2

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

TBL 2.92 xGEDM 2.52 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdEDM goal, 19:37TBL goal, 1:37TBL goal, 12:13TBL goal, 16:58EDM goal, 7:16TBL goal, 15:32

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

TBL26 on goal, 4 scored
EDM27 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

TBL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. KucherovRW224700+3219:534:34
B. HagelLW022201+3020:472:50
A. CirelliC202500+2510:280:00
J. GuentzelC101200-1019:223:49
B. PointC011101-1017:542:57
Y. GourdeC0000000215:160:00
G. GoncalvesC000102-1014:130:39
Z. GirgensonsC0001230014:090:00
N. PaulLW0000210014:011:02
P. HolmbergRW0001100711:000:00
O. BjorkstrandRW000311-1010:101:10
C. PerryRW000100009:591:54
J. MoserD011000+3022:420:29
D. RaddyshD000301+1026:004:16
R. McDonaghD000002+2022:010:00
E. CernakD000130+1220:140:00
E. LillebergD000010-1013:020:00
C. D'AstousD000011-2011:580:35
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Vasilevskiy27262.96360:00Win
J. Johansson000–0:00

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. McDavidC101402-3422:422:11
J. SamanskiC101001+1010:050:32
Z. HymanLW000100-3020:282:11
R. Nugent-HopkinsC000200-3019:562:11
K. KapanenRW0001310017:370:36
J. DickinsonC0002320015:440:17
M. SavoieC000100-1015:272:10
V. PodkolzinRW0002400514:080:00
J. RoslovicC000111+1012:430:36
A. HenriqueC000201009:290:36
M. JonesLW000050029:270:15
R. JarventieLW000112008:300:32
E. BouchardD011300-3027:372:11
M. EkholmD000023-2023:490:55
D. NurseD0003810220:260:32
C. MurphyD0000030517:230:00
J. WalmanD000300+1015:191:09
T. EmbersonD000110+1013:180:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Ingram27234.85258:42Loss
T. Jarry000–0:00

Lines at 5-on-5

TBL

Line 1N. Kucherov13:55B. Hagel15:10A. Cirelli8:34
Line 2J. Guentzel14:16G. Goncalves13:25B. Point14:07
Pair 1D. Raddysh20:38J. Moser20:18
Pair 2R. McDonagh17:55E. Cernak16:59
Pair 3E. Lilleberg11:05C. D'Astous10:28

EDM

Pair 1M. Ekholm19:00E. Bouchard20:30
Pair 2C. Murphy15:26D. Nurse17:20
Pair 3T. Emberson12:17J. Walman12:17

From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreTBL 3.4, EDM 3.2TBL 5, EDM 2
Total goals6.77
Shots on goalTBL 26.6, EDM 29.7TBL 28, EDM 27
Win chanceTBL 52%TBL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM C. McDavid3.341.50137%1
EDM Z. Hyman2.910.82038%0
EDM E. Bouchard2.930.91118%0
TBL N. Kucherov2.771.50434%2
TBL B. Hagel2.520.90230%0
TBL J. Guentzel2.320.90133%1
TBL D. Raddysh2.230.76014%0
TBL B. Point2.010.92134%0
EDM D. Nurse1.830.2908%0
EDM J. Roslovic1.810.47020%0
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins1.820.73023%0
EDM M. Savoie1.710.45016%0
TBL O. Bjorkstrand1.730.51020%0
EDM J. Walman1.730.33010%0
EDM M. Ekholm1.700.4309%0
EDM K. Kapanen1.610.40015%0
EDM V. Podkolzin1.620.41016%0
TBL A. Cirelli1.650.64221%2
TBL C. Perry1.410.43020%0
TBL Y. Gourde1.300.41014%0
TBL N. Paul1.200.32016%0
TBL G. Goncalves1.210.46016%0
TBL J. Moser1.100.3116%0
EDM J. Dickinson1.120.29014%0
TBL Z. Girgensons1.110.19010%0
EDM C. Murphy1.100.2106%0
EDM A. Henrique1.020.23012%0
TBL P. Holmberg1.010.29011%0
EDM M. Jones1.000.1808%0
TBL C. D'Astous0.900.3506%0
TBL R. McDonagh0.900.3605%0
TBL E. Cernak0.710.2003%0
EDM R. Jarventie0.710.1607%0
TBL E. Lilleberg0.600.2003%0
EDM T. Emberson0.610.1503%0
EDM J. Samanski0.400.2018%1

Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.