Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
TBL5
FinalSun, Feb 9, 2025Every game that night
MTL3

TBL beat MTL 5-3 despite fewer good chances: 3.16 expected goals to 4.04. MTL outshot TBL 35 to 21. B. Gallagher led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). J. Anderson had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.5. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 32 of 35.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
TBL2215
MTL1113
  1. 1st 6:56TBLN. Paul0.13 xG
  2. 1st 10:28TBLV. Hedman0.25 xG
  3. 1st 18:53MTLB. GallagherPP0.07 xG
  4. 2nd 1:05TBLB. PointPP0.17 xG
  5. 2nd 6:43TBLZ. Girgensons0.22 xG
  6. 2nd 12:45MTLC. Dvorak0.06 xG
  7. 3rd 9:19MTLB. Gallagher0.10 xG
  8. 3rd 19:44TBLA. CirelliEN0.80 xG

Team Stats

TBLMTL
21Shots on goal35
3.16Expected goals4.04
44Shot attempts83
145v5 shots on goal31
1/1Power play1/2
26Hits29
25Blocked shots16
6Penalty minutes4
14Giveaways19
7Takeaways11

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

TBL 3.16 xGMTL 4.04 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdTBL goal, 6:56TBL goal, 10:28MTL goal, 18:53TBL goal, 1:05TBL goal, 6:43MTL goal, 12:45MTL goal, 9:19TBL goal, 19:44

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

TBL20 on goal, 5 scored
MTL34 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

TBL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. HagelLW022131+2023:121:39
A. CirelliC112112+1018:501:43
J. GuentzelC022303+1018:431:39
N. PaulLW101111+1018:220:00
B. PointC101213+1018:181:43
G. GoncalvesC0112110015:210:00
Z. GirgensonsC101231+1014:390:00
M. EyssimontC011021+1010:370:00
C. AtkinsonRW011001+109:500:00
L. GlendeningC000010-1211:430:04
D. DukeLW000030-108:050:00
M. ChaffeeRW000100-107:490:00
V. HedmanD112216-1023:501:43
R. McDonaghD000010+3022:100:00
E. CernakD000321+3020:520:00
N. PerbixD000021-1018:220:00
D. RaddyshD0002200417:300:04
E. LillebergD0001230015:580:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Vasilevskiy35323.91460:00Win
B. Halverson000–0:00

MTL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. GallagherRW2023210013:501:52
A. NewhookC011010-1017:002:00
J. SlafkovskýLW011010-1015:341:55
C. DvorakC101240+1014:432:01
C. CaufieldRW000511-2020:491:47
N. SuzukiC000200-2020:261:50
J. EvansC0000210017:430:00
K. DachC000122-1015:521:54
J. AndersonRW000622-1015:250:00
P. LaineLW000111-1211:131:53
O. BeckC0002300010:010:00
J. ArmiaRW000100009:310:00
M. MathesonD0115210223:311:51
D. SavardD0111020014:190:00
A. CarrierD0002010023:230:00
L. HutsonD000103-2022:051:58
J. StrubleD000230-1017:500:04
A. XhekajD0001510014:350:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Dobes853.62521:05
S. Montembeault12111.91737:22Loss

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreTBL 3.4, MTL 2.8TBL 5, MTL 3
Total goals6.28
Shots on goalTBL 29.1, MTL 27.1TBL 21, MTL 35
Win chanceTBL 59%TBL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
MTL C. Caufield3.250.76032%0
TBL J. Guentzel3.031.02239%0
TBL B. Hagel2.810.98233%0
TBL B. Point2.721.08142%1
TBL V. Hedman2.220.83213%1
MTL P. Laine2.210.60025%0
TBL A. Cirelli2.110.68226%1
MTL N. Suzuki2.020.80025%0
MTL M. Matheson1.950.53112%0
MTL B. Gallagher1.930.38217%2
TBL N. Paul1.810.50123%1
MTL J. Slafkovský1.700.57119%0
TBL D. Raddysh1.720.4707%0
MTL J. Armia1.710.36017%0
TBL M. Eyssimont1.600.21110%0
MTL J. Anderson1.560.31016%0
MTL A. Newhook1.400.41118%0
MTL K. Dach1.410.40015%0
MTL C. Dvorak1.420.38115%1
MTL A. Xhekaj1.310.1706%0
TBL Z. Girgensons1.320.18111%1
MTL L. Hutson1.210.6206%0
MTL A. Carrier1.220.3206%0
TBL R. McDonagh1.100.3604%0
MTL J. Evans1.100.39013%0
TBL C. Atkinson1.100.20110%0
TBL G. Goncalves1.020.2419%0
TBL E. Cernak0.930.2604%0
MTL O. Beck0.920.17010%0
TBL N. Perbix0.900.2805%0
TBL M. Chaffee0.810.23013%0
TBL L. Glendening0.800.1308%0
MTL J. Struble0.820.1505%0
MTL D. Savard0.710.2415%0
TBL E. Lilleberg0.710.2002%0

Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.