TBL beat NSH 3-2 in overtime, with the chances close: 2.57 expected goals to 2.07. R. Josi led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). L. Schenn had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.1. J. Johansson stopped 29 of 31.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| NSH | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
- 1st 1:23NSHR. Josi0.01 xG
- 2nd 4:06TBLA. CirelliSH0.11 xG
- 2nd 8:18TBLB. Hagel0.06 xG
- 2nd 11:20NSHR. Josi0.15 xG
- OT 1:01TBLB. PointPP0.11 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
TBL 2.57 xGNSH 2.07 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
TBL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Point | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 23:34 | 4:50 |
| B. Hagel | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:53 | 4:14 |
| A. Cirelli | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 17:13 | 1:51 |
| N. Kucherov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:39 | 3:44 |
| L. Glendening | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:34 | 0:06 |
| J. Guentzel | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21:56 | 4:46 |
| G. Goncalves | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:45 | 1:00 |
| Z. Girgensons | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:42 | 0:00 |
| M. Eyssimont | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 14:24 | 0:19 |
| C. Geekie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:42 | 1:02 |
| C. Atkinson | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:19 | 0:57 |
| V. Hedman | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 21:27 | 4:22 |
| D. Raddysh | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:56 | 1:32 |
| R. McDonagh | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 19:22 | 0:05 |
| E. Cernak | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 19:11 | 0:07 |
| J. Moser | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 15:36 | 0:00 |
| N. Perbix | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:12 | 0:00 |
| E. Lilleberg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:58 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Johansson | 31 | 29 | 2 | .935 | 61:01 | Win |
| M. Tomkins | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
NSH Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Stamkos | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 16:23 | 2:30 |
| L. Evangelista | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:49 | 1:01 |
| M. Jankowski | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 12:16 | 0:00 |
| F. Forsberg | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 19:58 | 2:30 |
| R. O'Reilly | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:26 | 2:30 |
| G. Nyquist | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:04 | 0:52 |
| J. Marchessault | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 16:39 | 2:39 |
| C. Sissons | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 13:58 | 0:00 |
| F. Svechkov | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:26 | 1:01 |
| C. Smith | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:11 | 0:00 |
| T. Novak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 12:27 | 1:01 |
| Z. L'Heureux | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:31 | 0:00 |
| R. Josi | D | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 25:38 | 2:30 |
| A. Carrier | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 23:14 | 0:00 |
| B. Skjei | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22:06 | 1:01 |
| L. Schenn | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:08 | 0:00 |
| A. Wilsby | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:31 | 0:00 |
| N. Blankenburg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:18 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Saros | 28 | 25 | 3 | .893 | 61:01 | OT loss |
| S. Wedgewood | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | TBL 3.2, NSH 3.2 | TBL 3, NSH 2 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | TBL 28.4, NSH 30.8 | TBL 28, NSH 31 |
| Win chance | TBL 50% | TBL won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSH F. Forsberg | 3.6 | 4 | 1.05 | 0 | 39% | 0 |
| TBL N. Kucherov | 3.4 | 2 | 1.48 | 1 | 34% | 0 |
| NSH R. Josi | 3.1 | 4 | 0.98 | 2 | 23% | 2 |
| NSH J. Marchessault | 3.1 | 1 | 0.81 | 0 | 33% | 0 |
| TBL J. Guentzel | 3.0 | 3 | 0.97 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| NSH S. Stamkos | 2.7 | 0 | 0.92 | 1 | 35% | 0 |
| TBL B. Hagel | 2.5 | 2 | 0.94 | 1 | 30% | 1 |
| TBL B. Point | 2.4 | 3 | 0.94 | 1 | 37% | 1 |
| NSH B. Skjei | 2.1 | 2 | 0.52 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| TBL V. Hedman | 2.0 | 4 | 0.77 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| NSH L. Evangelista | 1.8 | 3 | 0.42 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| NSH R. O'Reilly | 1.8 | 0 | 0.74 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| TBL A. Cirelli | 1.8 | 3 | 0.64 | 1 | 22% | 1 |
| TBL M. Eyssimont | 1.7 | 2 | 0.23 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NSH T. Novak | 1.6 | 1 | 0.60 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| NSH G. Nyquist | 1.6 | 2 | 0.76 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| TBL C. Atkinson | 1.4 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| TBL C. Geekie | 1.3 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| NSH M. Jankowski | 1.2 | 1 | 0.34 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| NSH L. Schenn | 1.1 | 4 | 0.16 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| NSH A. Carrier | 1.1 | 2 | 0.31 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NSH C. Smith | 1.1 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NSH C. Sissons | 1.1 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| TBL Z. Girgensons | 1.1 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NSH Z. L'Heureux | 1.0 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| NSH N. Blankenburg | 1.0 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| TBL D. Raddysh | 1.0 | 1 | 0.28 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL R. McDonagh | 0.9 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL G. Goncalves | 0.9 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| TBL J. Moser | 0.9 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| TBL N. Perbix | 0.9 | 2 | 0.25 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| TBL L. Glendening | 0.8 | 0 | 0.11 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| TBL E. Cernak | 0.7 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| TBL E. Lilleberg | 0.6 | 2 | 0.16 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 34 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.