Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
UTA4
Final/OTWed, Oct 16, 2024Every game that night
ANA5

ANA beat UTA 5-4 in overtime, with the chances close: 3.40 expected goals to 3.26. P. Mintyukov led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). T. Zegras had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.9. L. Dostal stopped 26 of 30.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdOTT
UTA20204
ANA12115
  1. 1st 4:40ANAT. Terry0.07 xG
  2. 1st 8:54UTAJ. McBain0.07 xG
  3. 1st 13:25UTAB. HaytonPP0.27 xG
  4. 2nd 8:06ANAR. Fabbri0.13 xG
  5. 2nd 16:52ANAP. Mintyukov0.10 xG
  6. 3rd 5:21UTAM. Kesselring0.08 xG
  7. 3rd 10:50UTAC. Keller0.12 xG
  8. 3rd 14:55ANAP. Mintyukov0.40 xG
  9. OT 0:54ANAL. Carlsson0.23 xG

Team Stats

UTAANA
30Shots on goal34
3.26Expected goals3.40
67Shot attempts67
235v5 shots on goal29
1/2Power play0/5
9Hits19
20Blocked shots19
14Penalty minutes8
19Giveaways21
6Takeaways6

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

UTA 3.26 xGANA 3.40 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdOTANA goal, 4:40UTA goal, 8:54UTA goal, 13:25ANA goal, 8:06ANA goal, 16:52UTA goal, 5:21UTA goal, 10:50ANA goal, 14:55ANA goal, 0:54

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

UTA30 on goal, 4 scored
ANA34 on goal, 5 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

UTA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. SchmaltzC022501-1218:482:39
J. McBainC112110+1213:010:00
C. KellerRW101300-1018:462:39
B. HaytonC1011000017:082:39
D. GuentherRW0114000014:542:39
J. DoanRW0111010412:171:01
A. KerfootC000302-1016:590:00
L. CrouseLW0001020215:101:01
L. CooleyC0003020013:001:01
M. MaccelliLW000210-1012:250:58
K. StenlundC000220-1212:070:00
M. CarconeLW000120-1010:450:00
M. KesselringD112112+3021:580:03
M. SergachevD011104+1027:522:39
I. ColeD000014-2024:460:00
J. VälimäkiD000111-1022:301:01
V. KolyachonokD000000-2010:140:00
R. BortuzzoD000001-2210:020:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Ingram34295.85360:54OT loss
K. Vejmelka000–0:00

ANA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
L. CarlssonC112400+2019:415:02
M. McTavishC022320+1018:495:09
T. TerryRW101200+1018:185:14
T. ZegrasC011500+1018:014:05
R. FabbriC101220+1017:231:55
R. StromeC011300-1015:583:41
F. VatranoRW0110210015:493:56
B. McGinnLW011230+1012:580:00
A. KillornLW0000100017:153:36
C. GauthierLW000212-1212:493:57
I. LundestromC0001010011:180:00
B. LeasonRW0001000010:040:00
P. MintyukovD202203+2021:552:50
B. DumoulinD011223+1018:450:00
O. ZellwegerD000300+1019:254:55
C. FowlerD000102-1218:390:00
R. GudasD000054+1418:080:00
T. LuneauD000113-1013:510:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
L. Dostal30264.86760:50Win
J. Reimer000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreUTA 3.4, ANA 2.9UTA 4, ANA 5
Total goals6.49
Shots on goalUTA 29.5, ANA 28.2UTA 30, ANA 34
Win chanceUTA 58%ANA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
UTA C. Keller2.831.07134%1
ANA F. Vatrano2.700.62128%0
UTA D. Guenther2.540.79129%0
UTA B. Hayton2.010.54120%1
UTA N. Schmaltz2.050.95228%0
ANA T. Zegras1.950.66122%0
ANA A. Killorn1.900.62024%0
ANA T. Terry1.920.70126%1
UTA L. Cooley1.930.63021%0
UTA M. Sergachev1.810.70110%0
UTA L. Crouse1.710.52023%0
ANA L. Carlsson1.740.49219%1
UTA J. Doan1.710.63122%0
ANA M. McTavish1.530.52220%0
ANA R. Strome1.530.49116%0
ANA R. Fabbri1.420.48122%1
UTA M. Kesselring1.410.4028%1
UTA M. Carcone1.410.37020%0
UTA A. Kerfoot1.430.58017%0
ANA T. Luneau1.410.3307%0
UTA M. Maccelli1.420.62015%0
ANA P. Mintyukov1.320.5028%2
ANA O. Zellweger1.330.3607%0
UTA J. Välimäki1.210.3705%0
ANA B. Leason1.210.30014%0
ANA C. Fowler1.210.5409%0
ANA R. Gudas1.200.2806%0
UTA K. Stenlund1.020.21014%0
ANA B. Dumoulin0.920.2615%0
ANA B. McGinn0.920.21111%0
ANA I. Lundestrom0.910.29014%0
UTA J. McBain0.810.36213%1
UTA I. Cole0.800.2104%0
UTA V. Kolyachonok0.700.2005%0
UTA R. Bortuzzo0.600.1003%0

Shots on goal: 20 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.