Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
VAN6
FinalTue, Oct 22, 2024Every game that night
CHI3

VAN beat CHI 6-3, with the chances close: 2.94 expected goals to 3.28. J. Miller led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). C. Bedard had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.8. K. Lankinen stopped 31 of 34.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
VAN4026
CHI2013
  1. 1st 0:21VAND. Heinen0.25 xG
  2. 1st 6:01VANJ. MillerPP0.05 xG
  3. 1st 9:25CHIR. Donato0.18 xG
  4. 1st 10:46VAND. Heinen0.10 xG
  5. 1st 13:29CHIT. Hall0.18 xG
  6. 1st 15:17VANC. Garland0.37 xG
  7. 3rd 10:29VANB. BoeserPP0.11 xG
  8. 3rd 10:58VANP. Suter0.22 xG
  9. 3rd 14:04CHIT. BertuzziPP0.25 xG

Team Stats

VANCHI
30Shots on goal34
2.94Expected goals3.28
55Shot attempts57
255v5 shots on goal26
2/3Power play1/5
25Hits16
12Blocked shots14
10Penalty minutes4
12Giveaways19
9Takeaways6

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

VAN 2.94 xGCHI 3.28 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdVAN goal, 0:21VAN goal, 6:01CHI goal, 9:25VAN goal, 10:46CHI goal, 13:29VAN goal, 15:17VAN goal, 10:29VAN goal, 10:58CHI goal, 14:04

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

VAN29 on goal, 6 scored
CHI33 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

VAN Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. MillerC1232000016:202:40
C. GarlandRW112202+1016:072:36
K. SherwoodLW0223120+2015:120:00
D. HeinenLW202300+2014:350:57
E. PetterssonC011110+1018:252:18
T. BluegerC011400+2216:360:00
P. SuterC1011110014:510:00
B. BoeserRW101110-1014:242:38
N. AmanC0110300010:410:00
J. DeBruskLW000000-1213:091:05
N. HoglanderLW0003200012:550:59
A. BainsLW0000100010:250:55
Q. HughesD022501+3019:492:30
F. HronekD011102+2221:091:09
E. BrannstromD011102+1214:020:00
T. MyersD000012-1022:340:08
C. SoucyD000110-2220:210:00
V. DesharnaisD000222+1019:000:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
K. Lankinen34313.91260:00Win
A. Silovs000–0:00

CHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. FolignoLW011230-2021:015:26
T. BertuzziLW101512+1014:515:40
R. DonatoC101110+1014:490:00
T. HallLW101200+1013:433:00
J. DickinsonC011020+1213:410:00
C. BedardC000612-3021:555:40
T. TeravainenC000000-3020:215:41
I. MikheyevRW0001000014:370:00
P. MaroonLW000320-1014:032:45
C. SmithC000312-1013:352:46
L. ReichelLW0003010013:212:01
A. AthanasiouC000111009:470:45
A. VlasicD011011-1023:344:47
S. JonesD011012-2022:363:38
C. MurphyD011320+1218:400:00
W. KaiserD0001030016:380:00
N. AllanD000200-1015:130:01
T. BrodieD000100-1014:170:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
P. Mrazek30246.80059:43Loss
A. Soderblom000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreVAN 3.3, CHI 2.5VAN 6, CHI 3
Total goals5.89
Shots on goalVAN 28.0, CHI 25.7VAN 30, CHI 34
Win chanceVAN 63%VAN won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
VAN C. Garland2.820.75226%1
CHI C. Bedard2.860.87024%0
VAN J. Miller2.621.18334%1
VAN B. Boeser2.510.89134%1
CHI S. Jones2.400.53113%0
VAN E. Pettersson2.411.02134%0
VAN J. DeBrusk2.400.69029%0
VAN Q. Hughes2.150.98211%0
CHI T. Hall2.120.58121%1
CHI T. Teravainen2.000.74025%0
CHI T. Bertuzzi2.050.60123%1
CHI N. Foligno1.920.50119%0
VAN N. Hoglander1.730.48023%0
VAN K. Sherwood1.630.40216%0
CHI R. Donato1.610.35115%1
CHI I. Mikheyev1.510.36017%0
VAN F. Hronek1.510.4917%0
VAN D. Heinen1.530.47220%2
VAN P. Suter1.410.35116%1
CHI A. Athanasiou1.310.31013%0
CHI C. Smith1.330.27013%0
CHI J. Dickinson1.300.35116%0
VAN T. Blueger1.240.37111%0
VAN T. Myers1.100.2603%0
CHI L. Reichel1.130.27010%0
CHI C. Murphy1.030.1717%0
CHI A. Vlasic1.000.2315%0
VAN E. Brannstrom0.910.2613%0
VAN C. Soucy0.910.2406%0
VAN A. Bains0.800.19012%0
CHI P. Maroon0.830.2308%0
CHI W. Kaiser0.710.2503%0
VAN N. Aman0.600.2017%0
CHI T. Brodie0.610.2603%0
VAN V. Desharnais0.520.1402%0

Shots on goal: 16 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.