Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
VAN2
FinalThu, Jan 23, 2025Every game that night
EDM6

EDM beat VAN 6-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.62 expected goals to 1.53. EDM outshot VAN 34 to 26. Z. Hyman led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). Z. Hyman had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.9. C. Pickard stopped 24 of 26.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
VAN0202
EDM3216
  1. 1st 5:52EDMZ. Hyman0.15 xG
  2. 1st 14:21EDML. DraisaitlPP0.14 xG
  3. 1st 14:41EDMA. Henrique0.09 xG
  4. 2nd 1:59EDMZ. Hyman0.05 xG
  5. 2nd 12:02EDMR. Nugent-HopkinsPP0.19 xG
  6. 2nd 12:27VANB. Boeser0.04 xG
  7. 2nd 15:06VANF. Hronek0.05 xG
  8. 3rd 10:21EDMK. Kapanen0.03 xG

Team Stats

VANEDM
26Shots on goal34
1.53Expected goals4.62
54Shot attempts64
225v5 shots on goal23
0/0Power play2/4
25Hits19
13Blocked shots12
26Penalty minutes8
9Giveaways9
3Takeaways6

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

VAN 1.53 xGEDM 4.62 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdEDM goal, 5:52EDM goal, 14:21EDM goal, 14:41EDM goal, 1:59EDM goal, 12:02VAN goal, 12:27VAN goal, 15:06EDM goal, 10:21

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

VAN26 on goal, 2 scored
EDM34 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

VAN Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. BoeserRW112330+2016:520:00
P. SuterC011300+1018:350:00
J. MillerC011341+2017:300:00
E. PetterssonC000011-1017:120:00
C. GarlandRW000000-2415:310:00
T. BluegerC000100-2215:050:00
J. DeBruskLW000210-2014:580:00
D. HeinenLW000110-1013:520:00
P. Di GiuseppeLW0003200012:550:00
M. SassonC000100-1010:110:00
L. KarlssonC000120-109:380:00
K. SherwoodLW000031-126:100:00
Q. HughesD0113010025:120:00
F. HronekD101213-1024:520:00
C. SoucyD000134-2221:510:00
D. ForbortD0002300019:580:00
V. DesharnaisD0000120618:430:00
M. FriedmanD000000-1109:530:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
T. Demko34286.82460:00Loss
K. Lankinen000–0:00

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
L. DraisaitlC1232000021:556:18
Z. HymanLW213603+2019:205:48
R. Nugent-HopkinsC1123000019:295:44
V. ArvidssonLW0111000014:540:38
A. HenriqueC101130+1014:370:42
C. PerryRW011100+3214:291:14
K. KapanenRW101220+2012:390:00
N. PhilpC011220+1010:550:00
C. BrownRW000000-1014:080:00
M. JanmarkC000000-1214:080:00
J. SkinnerLW0003000013:346:31
V. PodkolzinRW000362-1012:130:00
E. BouchardD011200+1022:296:24
M. EkholmD011401+2017:430:33
T. EmbersonD0111010016:590:00
D. NurseD000152+1222:191:18
B. KulakD000202+1020:310:00
T. StecherD000011-1214:240:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Pickard26242.92359:14Win
S. Skinner000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreVAN 2.6, EDM 3.3VAN 2, EDM 6
Total goals5.88
Shots on goalVAN 22.9, EDM 29.5VAN 26, EDM 34
Win chanceEDM 62%EDM won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM L. Draisaitl3.021.51345%1
EDM Z. Hyman2.960.86338%2
EDM E. Bouchard2.420.82118%0
EDM V. Arvidsson2.310.62121%0
VAN C. Garland2.200.61022%0
VAN Q. Hughes2.130.90113%0
EDM D. Nurse2.110.40012%0
EDM M. Ekholm1.940.45113%0
VAN J. Miller1.930.83125%0
VAN E. Pettersson1.900.76027%0
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins1.830.79223%1
VAN J. DeBrusk1.820.52025%0
VAN B. Boeser1.830.63226%1
VAN K. Sherwood1.700.41019%0
EDM J. Skinner1.630.43018%0
VAN P. Suter1.530.37118%0
EDM V. Podkolzin1.530.36014%0
EDM B. Kulak1.320.3108%0
EDM C. Brown1.300.35010%0
EDM A. Henrique1.210.43119%1
VAN F. Hronek1.220.4117%1
EDM C. Perry1.110.34115%0
VAN D. Heinen1.110.36016%0
VAN M. Sasson1.010.24010%0
VAN T. Blueger1.010.3009%0
VAN P. Giuseppe0.930.21010%0
EDM K. Kapanen0.920.26110%1
VAN M. Friedman0.900.1103%0
EDM N. Philp0.820.1918%0
VAN C. Soucy0.810.1705%0
EDM M. Janmark0.800.29010%0
EDM T. Emberson0.710.2013%0
VAN L. Karlsson0.710.1409%0
EDM T. Stecher0.700.1204%0
VAN D. Forbort0.620.1404%0
VAN V. Desharnais0.500.1101%0

Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.