Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
VAN4
Final/SOMon, Mar 24, 2025Every game that night
NJD3

VAN beat NJD 4-3 in a shootout, with the chances close: 4.28 expected goals to 3.79. T. Meier led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). Q. Hughes had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.5. T. Demko stopped 22 of 25.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdSOT
VAN10214
NJD01203
  1. 1st 10:09VANP. Suter0.18 xG
  2. 2nd 10:24NJDT. MeierPP0.04 xG
  3. 3rd 11:02NJDT. Meier0.10 xG
  4. 3rd 11:47VANJ. Lekkerimäki0.23 xG
  5. 3rd 13:25NJDE. Haula0.37 xG
  6. 3rd 19:24VANC. Garland0.59 xG

Team Stats

VANNJD
28Shots on goal25
4.28Expected goals3.79
61Shot attempts60
195v5 shots on goal16
0/2Power play1/2
22Hits16
17Blocked shots11
4Penalty minutes6
11Giveaways13
1Takeaways3

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

VAN 4.28 xGNJD 3.79 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdOTVAN goal, 10:09NJD goal, 10:24NJD goal, 11:02VAN goal, 11:47NJD goal, 13:25VAN goal, 19:24

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

VAN28 on goal, 3 scored
NJD24 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

VAN Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
P. SuterC112522+2023:022:30
J. DeBruskLW011210+2021:482:20
C. GarlandRW101200+1018:531:30
N. AmanC011110+1010:090:06
J. LekkerimäkiRW101210+109:521:00
B. BoeserRW000111+2022:582:38
D. O'ConnorLW0001000016:460:06
K. SherwoodLW000051-2014:020:45
T. BluegerC000030-1213:440:00
A. RätyC000122-1012:070:31
L. KarlssonC000001+1011:281:34
D. JoshuaC000121-2011:020:00
M. PetterssonD011003+2019:070:06
D. ForbortD0111000215:320:02
Q. HughesD0006200031:383:52
F. HronekD000414-1025:132:28
T. MyersD000100+1021:570:32
V. ManciniD0000120012:230:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
T. Demko25223.88063:36Win
A. Silovs000–0:00

NJD Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. MeierRW2024320020:132:06
N. HischierC011111-1024:302:08
J. BrattLW011200-1023:282:30
D. MercerC011201-2017:251:43
E. HaulaLW101200+1015:150:00
C. GlassC0001200016:240:15
S. NoesenRW0000000016:051:02
O. PalatLW000110-2014:200:37
P. CotterLW000310+1011:540:00
T. TatarLW0001100010:370:39
J. DowlingC000222008:100:00
N. FooteLW000000+108:000:00
B. DillonD0111310020:200:00
B. DumoulinD011210+1018:470:00
L. HughesD000100-2024:351:43
B. PesceD000202-2024:010:00
J. KovacevicD000012+1618:570:00
D. CholowskiD0000000015:591:02
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Markstrom28253.89365:00OT loss
J. Allen000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamPaul Cotter VAN Faces NJD, his team until Apr 20263 SOG
  • HometownDrew O'Connor VAN Plays near home (born in Chatham)1 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreVAN 2.9, NJD 3.0VAN 4, NJD 3
Total goals5.97
Shots on goalVAN 24.3, NJD 26.0VAN 28, NJD 25
Win chanceNJD 52%VAN won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
NJD T. Meier2.940.77232%2
NJD N. Hischier2.510.93131%0
VAN Q. Hughes2.561.03015%0
NJD J. Bratt2.321.08128%0
VAN C. Garland2.020.54122%1
NJD S. Noesen1.900.55022%0
VAN J. DeBrusk1.920.53126%0
VAN B. Boeser1.910.69029%0
NJD C. Glass1.610.43015%0
NJD L. Hughes1.610.63012%0
NJD E. Haula1.620.38116%1
VAN K. Sherwood1.500.41018%0
VAN P. Suter1.550.43221%1
NJD D. Mercer1.520.46122%0
VAN F. Hronek1.440.5008%0
NJD B. Pesce1.320.2808%0
VAN D. O'Connor1.310.30014%0
VAN T. Myers1.210.3005%0
NJD O. Palat1.110.41016%0
VAN J. Lekkerimäki1.120.22111%1
VAN T. Blueger1.100.2909%0
NJD N. Foote1.000.30015%0
NJD T. Tatar1.010.31013%0
VAN V. Mancini1.000.2604%0
VAN M. Pettersson0.900.3114%0
NJD P. Cotter0.930.27014%0
NJD J. Kovacevic0.900.2406%0
VAN D. Joshua0.910.31016%0
VAN L. Karlsson0.800.1309%0
NJD B. Dumoulin0.720.2515%0
VAN A. Räty0.710.18010%0
NJD J. Dowling0.720.1809%0
NJD B. Dillon0.610.2316%0
VAN D. Forbort0.610.1414%0
NJD D. Cholowski0.600.2205%0
VAN N. Aman0.510.1917%0

Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.