PHI beat VAN 5-2, and the chances backed it up: 5.31 expected goals to 2.28. PHI outshot VAN 39 to 25. N. Grebenkin led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). O. Tippett had 10 shots on goal against our projection of 2.5. D. Vladar stopped 23 of 25.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| PHI | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
- 2nd 13:13PHIN. Grebenkin0.07 xG
- 3rd 5:58PHIC. Grundstrom0.05 xG
- 3rd 7:49PHIC. Dvorak0.53 xG
- 3rd 13:05VANM. Sasson0.45 xG
- 3rd 15:35PHIO. Tippett0.22 xG
- 3rd 18:49PHIM. MichkovEN0.70 xG
- 3rd 19:42VAND. O'Connor0.22 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
VAN 2.28 xGPHI 5.31 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Garland | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 18:34 | 3:19 |
| D. O'Connor | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:06 | 0:00 |
| M. Sasson | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 12:11 | 0:00 |
| M. Rossi | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:51 | 3:19 |
| B. Boeser | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:28 | 3:19 |
| E. Kane | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 18:59 | 0:41 |
| K. Sherwood | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 16:17 | 0:41 |
| D. Kampf | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:38 | 0:00 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:52 | 3:16 |
| L. Ohgren | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:35 | 0:00 |
| L. Karlsson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 10:24 | 0:41 |
| A. Räty | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:14 | 0:00 |
| Z. Buium | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 21:13 | 3:19 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +2 | 2 | 20:28 | 0:00 |
| E. Pettersson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:37 | 0:00 |
| F. Hronek | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | -4 | 0 | 22:09 | 0:44 |
| M. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 21:02 | 0:00 |
| T. Willander | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:38 | 0:41 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Demko | 38 | 34 | 4 | .895 | 58:44 | Loss |
| K. Lankinen | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Abols | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 14:07 | 0:00 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 12:16 | 0:00 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:37 | 1:03 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:11 | 1:06 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16:00 | 0:05 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:41 | 0:58 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:19 | 0:57 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:57 | 0:54 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 12:55 | 0:00 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:54 | 0:00 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:09 | 1:00 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 14:26 | 0:57 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 23:00 | 0:49 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 19:10 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 22:56 | 0:55 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:36 | 1:06 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:41 | 0:05 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:05 | 0:05 |
Lines at 5-on-5
VAN
PHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | VAN 2.9, PHI 2.8 | VAN 2, PHI 5 |
| Total goals | 5.7 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | VAN 23.9, PHI 26.3 | VAN 25, PHI 39 |
| Win chance | VAN 51% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.5 | 10 | 0.68 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.4 | 1 | 0.93 | 1 | 28% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.3 | 1 | 0.88 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| VAN E. Kane | 2.2 | 4 | 0.53 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 2.2 | 2 | 0.58 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| VAN C. Garland | 2.2 | 2 | 0.66 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 2.1 | 2 | 0.73 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.1 | 4 | 0.66 | 1 | 22% | 1 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 2.0 | 2 | 0.62 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 2.0 | 5 | 0.32 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| VAN K. Sherwood | 2.0 | 3 | 0.55 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.6 | 1 | 0.58 | 1 | 18% | 1 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.6 | 0 | 0.53 | 1 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.6 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| VAN M. Rossi | 1.6 | 1 | 0.63 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.6 | 3 | 0.54 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.5 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| VAN F. Hronek | 1.4 | 2 | 0.54 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN L. Karlsson | 1.3 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.3 | 3 | 0.22 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.2 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 1.1 | 0 | 0.26 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI R. Abols | 1.1 | 1 | 0.21 | 2 | 10% | 0 |
| VAN D. O'Connor | 1.1 | 1 | 0.29 | 1 | 13% | 1 |
| VAN L. Ohgren | 1.1 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| VAN T. Myers | 1.1 | 1 | 0.29 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.1 | 3 | 0.36 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN M. Sasson | 1.0 | 2 | 0.26 | 1 | 14% | 1 |
| VAN A. Räty | 1.0 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN D. Kampf | 0.9 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| VAN Z. Buium | 0.9 | 0 | 0.42 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN M. Pettersson | 0.9 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| VAN T. Willander | 0.7 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.7 | 2 | 0.20 | 2 | 9% | 1 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 0.6 | 2 | 0.16 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 17 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.