Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
WPG6
FinalFri, Mar 7, 2025Every game that night
NJD1

WPG beat NJD 6-1, and the chances backed it up: 3.71 expected goals to 2.70. WPG outshot NJD 35 to 23. N. Ehlers led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). C. Miller had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.1. C. Hellebuyck stopped 22 of 23.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
WPG1236
NJD0011
  1. 1st 18:17WPGA. Iafallo0.20 xG
  2. 2nd 3:48WPGJ. MorrisseyPP0.32 xG
  3. 2nd 19:30WPGN. Ehlers0.06 xG
  4. 3rd 0:31NJDD. Mercer0.07 xG
  5. 3rd 11:56WPGA. Lowry0.09 xG
  6. 3rd 14:21WPGK. Connor0.10 xG
  7. 3rd 16:55WPGC. Perfetti0.18 xG

Team Stats

WPGNJD
35Shots on goal23
3.71Expected goals2.70
51Shot attempts60
305v5 shots on goal22
1/2Power play0/2
23Hits32
19Blocked shots8
4Penalty minutes4
8Giveaways14
3Takeaways1

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

WPG 3.71 xGNJD 2.70 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdWPG goal, 18:17WPG goal, 3:48WPG goal, 19:30NJD goal, 0:31WPG goal, 11:56WPG goal, 14:21WPG goal, 16:55

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

WPG35 on goal, 6 scored
NJD23 on goal, 1 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

WPG Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. EhlersLW123410+1016:092:57
K. ConnorLW112202+1018:233:01
M. ScheifeleC011340+2016:552:58
G. VilardiC011000+2016:232:59
C. PerfettiC1013010014:160:53
A. LowryC101250+1213:250:00
A. IafalloLW101100+1011:400:56
M. AppletonC000000+1016:170:00
V. NamestnikovC0001110016:110:57
N. NiederreiterRW000201+1015:020:55
M. BarronC000330+1012:400:00
B. TanevLW000021+1011:280:00
J. MorrisseyD112402+1023:243:14
D. SambergD011022+1022:550:00
D. DeMeloD011214+1020:420:00
L. StanleyD011121+2215:580:00
C. MillerD011413+2013:590:00
N. PionkD000311+1020:130:40
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Hellebuyck23221.95760:00Win
E. Comrie000–0:00

NJD Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
D. MercerC1011000016:561:41
O. PalatLW0110100014:091:59
N. HischierC000200-3018:312:12
J. BrattLW000130-3017:352:03
T. MeierRW000241-3016:222:00
S. NoesenRW000250-1015:572:19
T. TatarLW0000100015:341:49
P. CotterLW0001300015:171:57
E. HaulaLW000310-1015:000:00
C. LazarC0001200011:490:00
J. DowlingC000230-1011:410:00
N. BastianRW0001300011:280:00
J. KovacevicD0112200219:440:00
B. PesceD000300-1021:290:00
L. HughesD000103-1021:212:21
B. DillonD000120-3020:220:00
S. NemecD000004-3216:341:39
B. DumoulinD0000200016:170:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Markstrom35296.82960:00Loss
J. Allen000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamDawson Mercer WPG First game back in Newark, his team until Oct 20261 G, 1 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreWPG 2.8, NJD 2.7WPG 6, NJD 1
Total goals5.57
Shots on goalWPG 25.6, NJD 28.0WPG 35, NJD 23
Win chanceWPG 50%WPG won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
WPG K. Connor3.020.92235%1
NJD T. Meier2.820.63029%0
NJD N. Hischier2.520.80029%0
WPG N. Ehlers2.540.72325%1
WPG J. Morrissey2.140.67213%1
NJD J. Bratt2.110.82024%0
WPG M. Scheifele1.930.85132%0
NJD L. Hughes1.910.5209%0
WPG G. Vilardi1.900.70129%0
NJD S. Noesen1.920.43020%0
WPG N. Niederreiter1.720.38019%0
NJD D. Mercer1.710.42121%1
WPG N. Pionk1.730.4208%0
NJD B. Pesce1.530.2405%0
WPG C. Perfetti1.530.46117%1
NJD E. Haula1.530.28014%0
WPG M. Appleton1.400.31012%0
WPG D. Samberg1.400.2615%0
NJD O. Palat1.300.37116%0
WPG A. Lowry1.220.35115%1
WPG V. Namestnikov1.210.41014%0
NJD P. Cotter1.110.27015%0
WPG C. Miller1.140.1815%0
NJD T. Tatar1.100.28013%0
NJD J. Kovacevic1.020.2115%0
WPG M. Barron1.030.1509%0
WPG B. Tanev1.000.22011%0
NJD N. Bastian1.010.22010%0
NJD B. Dumoulin1.000.2204%0
WPG A. Iafallo0.910.22110%1
WPG D. DeMelo0.920.2614%0
WPG L. Stanley0.910.1613%0
NJD S. Nemec0.900.1703%0
NJD B. Dillon0.810.2205%0
NJD C. Lazar0.810.1908%0
NJD J. Dowling0.720.1609%0

Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.