Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
WPG2
FinalMon, Jan 20, 2025Every game that night
UTA5

UTA beat WPG 5-2, and the chances backed it up: 2.82 expected goals to 1.98. B. Hayton led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). N. Bjugstad had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.7. C. Ingram stopped 23 of 25.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
WPG0022
UTA0235
  1. 2nd 16:00UTAO. Maatta0.03 xG
  2. 2nd 19:42UTAL. Cooley0.20 xG
  3. 3rd 4:53UTAB. Hayton0.24 xG
  4. 3rd 8:04UTAM. Maccelli0.11 xG
  5. 3rd 8:32WPGN. Niederreiter0.05 xG
  6. 3rd 11:48WPGD. DeMelo0.07 xG
  7. 3rd 17:55UTAC. KellerEN0.53 xG

Team Stats

WPGUTA
25Shots on goal28
1.98Expected goals2.82
64Shot attempts56
245v5 shots on goal25
0/0Power play0/2
21Hits27
13Blocked shots17
16Penalty minutes12
9Giveaways13
7Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

WPG 1.98 xGUTA 2.82 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdUTA goal, 16:00UTA goal, 19:42UTA goal, 4:53UTA goal, 8:04WPG goal, 8:32WPG goal, 11:48UTA goal, 17:55

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

WPG25 on goal, 2 scored
UTA28 on goal, 5 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

WPG Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. EhlersLW022200+1014:350:00
M. ScheifeleC011200-11220:200:00
N. NiederreiterRW1012200014:020:00
K. ConnorLW000101-4023:560:00
V. NamestnikovC0001200015:530:00
G. VilardiC000202-1015:360:00
A. IafalloLW000100-1015:300:00
R. KupariC000032-2012:290:00
M. BarronC0004300012:230:00
C. PerfettiC000110-2012:150:00
D. GustafssonC0002010011:200:00
A. LowryC000000005:180:00
D. SambergD011202-1023:480:00
D. DeMeloD101413-1218:440:00
N. PionkD000002-2223:140:00
J. MorrisseyD000000-2022:230:00
L. StanleyD0001400017:410:00
C. MillerD0000500015:090:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Hellebuyck27234.85259:24Loss
E. Comrie000–0:00

UTA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. HaytonC123310+3015:041:42
N. SchmaltzC022101+2017:462:17
J. DoanRW022100+2014:352:12
C. KellerRW112201+2013:140:00
L. CooleyC101321+2018:542:13
M. MaccelliLW101300+1015:001:44
K. StenlundC011010+1014:330:02
L. CrouseLW000032-1016:291:46
J. McBainC000171-1015:180:01
A. KerfootC0001000014:482:15
N. BjugstadC000500-1014:401:40
L. O'BrienC0000111-1011:250:00
O. MaattaD1012020019:350:03
I. ColeD000001+2022:430:08
J. MarinoD0001030022:062:03
M. KesselringD000201+31221:591:54
N. DeSimoneD0002220015:080:00
J. VälimäkiD000101+1014:430:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Ingram25232.92060:00Win
K. Vejmelka000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamKevin Stenlund UTA Faces WPG, his team until Apr 20231 A, 0 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreWPG 3.1, UTA 2.8WPG 2, UTA 5
Total goals5.97
Shots on goalWPG 28.2, UTA 28.4WPG 25, UTA 28
Win chanceWPG 55%UTA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
WPG K. Connor2.910.97035%0
WPG N. Ehlers2.520.76225%0
UTA C. Keller2.520.86229%1
UTA L. Cooley2.330.77126%1
UTA N. Schmaltz2.110.72223%0
WPG M. Scheifele2.020.89133%0
WPG N. Niederreiter2.020.48122%1
WPG J. Morrissey2.000.72011%0
WPG G. Vilardi1.820.71029%0
WPG C. Perfetti1.810.53018%0
UTA N. Bjugstad1.750.34016%0
UTA J. Doan1.610.40218%0
UTA M. Kesselring1.620.3206%0
UTA B. Hayton1.630.38315%1
UTA L. Crouse1.500.32018%0
WPG A. Iafallo1.510.38016%0
WPG N. Pionk1.500.4607%0
UTA M. Maccelli1.530.45114%1
WPG A. Lowry1.400.45018%0
WPG D. Samberg1.220.2414%0
UTA K. Stenlund1.200.19112%0
WPG V. Namestnikov1.110.42015%0
WPG C. Miller1.100.2005%0
UTA A. Kerfoot1.010.34012%0
UTA J. McBain1.010.32014%0
UTA I. Cole1.000.2203%0
WPG M. Barron1.040.1809%0
WPG D. DeMelo1.040.2914%1
UTA O. Maatta1.020.2314%1
UTA N. DeSimone1.020.1904%0
WPG L. Stanley0.910.2103%0
UTA L. O'Brien0.900.1406%0
WPG R. Kupari0.900.1707%0
UTA J. Välimäki0.910.2003%0
UTA J. Marino0.810.2704%0
WPG D. Gustafsson0.720.1205%0

Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.