Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
ANA4
FinalMon, Jan 26, 2026Every game that night
EDM7

EDM beat ANA 7-4, and the chances backed it up: 5.08 expected goals to 3.52. ANA outshot EDM 41 to 32. L. Draisaitl led the way with 4 points (0 G, 4 A). J. Trouba had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 1.6. T. Jarry stopped 37 of 41.

Team Stats

ANAEDM
41Shots on goal32
3.52Expected goals5.08
71Shot attempts57
295v5 shots on goal21
3/4Power play1/3
25Hits13
15Blocked shots10
6Penalty minutes8
14Giveaways19
6Takeaways6

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

ANA 3.52 xGEDM 5.08 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdANA goal, 3:24EDM goal, 17:14ANA goal, 0:55EDM goal, 4:36EDM goal, 6:28EDM goal, 7:34EDM goal, 8:25ANA goal, 13:41ANA goal, 13:38EDM goal, 18:12

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

ANA41 on goal, 4 scored
EDM31 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

ANA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. GranlundC303501-2024:176:13
B. SenneckeRW022710-4025:316:13
A. KillornLW101100-2019:180:31
R. PoehlingC011122-2018:530:00
C. GauthierLW011510-4017:555:42
C. KreiderLW011400-2017:186:13
J. VielLW000020-1012:470:00
J. HarkinsC000210-1211:260:00
T. WasheC0001300010:340:00
R. JohnstonLW000031-109:390:00
R. StromeC000001044:420:00
J. LaCombeD011143-2026:166:10
J. TroubaD0118130022:490:00
P. MintyukovD000102-1018:450:03
O. ZellwegerD000300-2015:090:00
R. GudasD000032-2014:590:00
D. HellesonD000030-1014:560:00
I. MooreD0002100012:530:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
V. Husso30255.83357:37Loss
L. Dostal000–0:00

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
L. DraisaitlC044100+2020:093:17
C. McDavidC112300+3023:363:15
Z. HymanLW112302+2019:223:17
R. Nugent-HopkinsC011110+1019:153:15
M. SavoieC011200+1410:410:00
V. PodkolzinRW000130+1016:091:01
K. KapanenRW000310+2015:350:59
M. JanmarkC0000000013:450:00
C. LazarC0001300011:240:00
J. RoslovicC000300+1211:131:01
T. FredericC000310007:590:00
J. SamanskiC000000+207:430:00
M. EkholmD303412+3019:580:59
E. BouchardD011122+2022:473:19
D. NurseD101212+1022:230:00
T. EmbersonD011102+1214:520:00
S. StastneyD101100+2014:230:00
J. WalmanD000200+1022:330:57
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
T. Jarry41374.90260:00Win
C. Ingram000–0:00

Lines at 5-on-5

ANA

Line 2R. Poehling15:17J. Viel11:58C. Gauthier10:54
Line 4T. Washe8:46R. Johnston9:31
Pair 1J. Trouba18:51J. LaCombe18:37
Pair 2P. Mintyukov15:42D. Helleson14:56
Pair 3R. Gudas13:14O. Zellweger12:59

EDM

Pair 1D. Nurse18:56J. Walman18:51
Pair 2M. Ekholm15:34E. Bouchard16:04
Pair 3T. Emberson13:05S. Stastney11:59

From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreANA 2.9, EDM 3.9ANA 4, EDM 7
Total goals6.811
Shots on goalANA 26.5, EDM 32.1ANA 41, EDM 32
Win chanceEDM 66%EDM won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM C. McDavid3.931.95244%1
EDM Z. Hyman3.431.06244%1
EDM E. Bouchard3.311.26124%0
EDM L. Draisaitl3.211.69449%0
ANA C. Gauthier3.150.69126%0
ANA B. Sennecke2.370.76225%0
EDM D. Nurse2.220.41111%1
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins2.111.01128%0
EDM J. Walman2.020.51013%0
ANA M. Granlund1.950.71319%3
EDM M. Ekholm1.940.55311%3
EDM J. Roslovic1.930.55022%0
ANA A. Killorn1.910.44120%1
ANA C. Kreider1.840.53129%0
ANA J. Trouba1.680.3218%0
ANA J. LaCombe1.510.50110%0
EDM V. Podkolzin1.410.43017%0
EDM K. Kapanen1.430.40014%0
EDM M. Savoie1.320.35116%0
ANA O. Zellweger1.330.2507%0
ANA J. Viel1.200.19011%0
ANA R. Poehling1.210.41114%0
ANA R. Strome1.200.35011%0
ANA P. Mintyukov1.110.3509%0
EDM S. Stastney1.010.1914%1
ANA R. Gudas0.900.2003%0
EDM T. Frederic0.930.22012%0
ANA J. Harkins0.920.1608%0
EDM T. Emberson0.810.2614%0
ANA T. Washe0.810.19011%0
EDM M. Janmark0.700.2509%0
ANA I. Moore0.720.1603%0
EDM C. Lazar0.610.1908%0
ANA D. Helleson0.600.1805%0
ANA R. Johnston0.600.1705%0

Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.