PHI beat ANA 5-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.86 expected goals to 1.98. PHI outshot ANA 39 to 18. T. Zegras led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). C. York had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. D. Vladar stopped 16 of 18.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| PHI | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
- 1st 4:15ANAC. GauthierPP0.09 xG
- 1st 10:22PHIT. Zegras0.04 xG
- 1st 14:23PHIT. ZegrasPP0.06 xG
- 2nd 1:15PHIC. York0.03 xG
- 2nd 14:40PHIT. Sanheim0.05 xG
- 3rd 1:25ANAA. KillornPP0.13 xG
- 3rd 18:46PHIN. GrebenkinEN0.76 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
ANA 1.98 xGPHI 4.86 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
ANA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Terry | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 16:15 | 1:55 |
| A. Killorn | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:02 | 2:04 |
| C. Gauthier | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 14:33 | 1:56 |
| M. Granlund | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 22:01 | 2:48 |
| C. Kreider | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 19:40 | 1:59 |
| L. Carlsson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18:02 | 2:47 |
| B. Sennecke | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -3 | 2 | 17:33 | 2:52 |
| R. Poehling | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:36 | 0:09 |
| M. McTavish | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 15:25 | 2:45 |
| J. Harkins | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5:44 | 0:00 |
| R. Johnston | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3:36 | 0:07 |
| J. LaCombe | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 19:15 | 1:55 |
| P. Mintyukov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 23:26 | 2:56 |
| J. Trouba | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 2 | 19:51 | 0:10 |
| R. Gudas | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | -1 | 7 | 17:29 | 0:00 |
| O. Zellweger | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:31 | 0:02 |
| D. Helleson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13:57 | 0:00 |
| I. Moore | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 8:10 | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Zegras | C | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 22:39 | 10:29 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 17 | 13:42 | 4:42 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 11:49 | 2:38 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 23:39 | 10:05 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 23:30 | 10:24 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18:49 | 7:43 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:12 | 7:42 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:58 | 7:11 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 11:32 | 0:00 |
| R. Abols | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:07 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 3 | +1 | 5 | 9:22 | 0:00 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:26 | 0:00 |
| C. York | D | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | +3 | 0 | 25:35 | 8:25 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 24:38 | 7:57 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6 | +1 | 0 | 24:05 | 9:06 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17:41 | 0:14 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:35 | 2:29 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5:56 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
ANA
PHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | ANA 2.9, PHI 3.2 | ANA 2, PHI 5 |
| Total goals | 6.1 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | ANA 26.5, PHI 28.3 | ANA 18, PHI 39 |
| Win chance | PHI 55% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA C. Gauthier | 2.9 | 3 | 0.68 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.5 | 4 | 0.70 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.4 | 5 | 1.00 | 1 | 31% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.2 | 3 | 0.95 | 2 | 29% | 2 |
| ANA M. McTavish | 2.1 | 1 | 0.62 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| ANA T. Terry | 2.0 | 1 | 0.69 | 2 | 24% | 0 |
| ANA B. Sennecke | 2.0 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 2.0 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.9 | 3 | 0.68 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.8 | 1 | 0.60 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.8 | 4 | 0.35 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| ANA L. Carlsson | 1.8 | 1 | 0.69 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| ANA C. Kreider | 1.8 | 2 | 0.55 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| ANA J. LaCombe | 1.7 | 1 | 0.53 | 2 | 12% | 0 |
| ANA M. Granlund | 1.7 | 0 | 0.68 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| ANA J. Trouba | 1.7 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.6 | 0 | 0.58 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.5 | 2 | 0.55 | 2 | 19% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.5 | 2 | 0.49 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.4 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| ANA O. Zellweger | 1.4 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.4 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.3 | 5 | 0.47 | 2 | 9% | 1 |
| PHI R. Abols | 1.3 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.3 | 1 | 0.49 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| ANA A. Killorn | 1.2 | 2 | 0.32 | 1 | 15% | 1 |
| ANA I. Moore | 1.2 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| ANA P. Mintyukov | 1.2 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 1.1 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| ANA R. Poehling | 1.0 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| ANA R. Gudas | 1.0 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.8 | 3 | 0.22 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| ANA D. Helleson | 0.7 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.7 | 3 | 0.32 | 2 | 11% | 1 |
| ANA J. Harkins | 0.7 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| ANA R. Johnston | 0.5 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.