Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
BUF4
FinalThu, Oct 17, 2024Every game that night
CBJ6

CBJ beat BUF 6-4 despite fewer good chances: 1.72 expected goals to 2.43. K. Marchenko led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). I. Provorov had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. D. Tarasov stopped 20 of 24.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
BUF0314
CBJ2226
  1. 1st 5:12CBJE. ChinakhovPP0.09 xG
  2. 1st 19:28CBJK. Marchenko0.03 xG
  3. 2nd 9:34BUFR. McLeod0.16 xG
  4. 2nd 12:18CBJA. Fantilli0.17 xG
  5. 2nd 17:29BUFJ.Kulich0.10 xG
  6. 2nd 17:58CBJM. Olivier0.15 xG
  7. 2nd 19:35BUFO. Power0.15 xG
  8. 3rd 0:15CBJZ. Aston-Reese0.10 xG
  9. 3rd 8:10CBJD. Severson0.23 xG
  10. 3rd 17:51BUFJ. Peterka0.18 xG

Team Stats

BUFCBJ
24Shots on goal25
2.43Expected goals1.72
56Shot attempts42
155v5 shots on goal21
0/2Power play1/3
18Hits16
8Blocked shots17
6Penalty minutes4
13Giveaways14
6Takeaways7

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

BUF 2.43 xGCBJ 1.72 xGGoal

00.511.522.51st2nd3rdCBJ goal, 5:12CBJ goal, 19:28BUF goal, 9:34CBJ goal, 12:18BUF goal, 17:29CBJ goal, 17:58BUF goal, 19:35CBJ goal, 0:15CBJ goal, 8:10BUF goal, 17:51

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

BUF24 on goal, 4 scored
CBJ24 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

BUF Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. PeterkaRW1013000020:512:11
T. ThompsonC0112010020:422:27
R. McLeodC101200+1016:540:00
D. CozensC011310+2216:472:24
J. ZuckerLW011111+1016:432:13
J. GreenwayLW011040-1014:460:00
J.KulichC101500+1014:451:47
A. TuchRW000002-2217:421:34
Z. BensonLW0001010014:371:41
P. KrebsC000030-109:570:06
S. LaffertyC000000-109:370:00
B. MalenstynLW000130-108:590:00
R. DahlinD0111100026:512:17
O. PowerD101211-2021:391:45
H. JokiharjuD011112+1020:110:00
B. ByramD000000-1021:241:35
M. SamuelssonD000100-1013:560:00
C. CliftonD0001300211:330:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Levi25196.76057:20Loss
U. Luukkonen000–0:00

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. MarchenkoRW1123000019:582:28
M. OlivierRW112120+2214:340:04
E. ChinakhovRW101200+1019:483:19
A. FantilliC101410+1017:491:31
C. SillingerC0111220016:052:14
Z. Aston-ReeseLW101211+1010:550:00
K. JohnsonC011000006:261:51
S. MonahanC000100-1022:293:13
J. DanforthRW000241-1016:381:21
M. PyyhtiaLW000012+1013:240:00
S. KuralyC000020+1010:420:06
J. van RiemsdykLW000000-209:151:23
Z. WerenskiD022302-1024:034:09
J. ChristiansenD022121+2015:260:00
I. ProvorovD011412-2223:300:38
D. SeversonD101102+4021:391:33
J. JohnsonD0000010016:590:00
J. HarrisD000003-1016:290:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Tarasov24204.83359:51Win
J. Greaves000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreBUF 3.5, CBJ 3.4BUF 4, CBJ 6
Total goals6.910
Shots on goalBUF 33.0, CBJ 31.3BUF 24, CBJ 25
Win chanceBUF 52%CBJ won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
BUF T. Thompson3.420.95139%0
CBJ Z. Werenski3.030.80218%0
BUF A. Tuch2.800.96032%0
BUF D. Cozens2.730.69126%0
BUF J. Peterka2.730.63127%1
BUF R. Dahlin2.610.70115%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.430.60228%1
CBJ C. Sillinger2.310.50120%0
BUF J. Zucker2.310.54122%0
CBJ S. Monahan2.210.74025%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.240.57122%1
CBJ E. Chinakhov2.120.56121%1
CBJ K. Johnson1.800.58121%0
BUF J. Greenway1.800.44117%0
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.600.43016%0
BUF O. Power1.620.4417%1
BUF Z. Benson1.310.41015%0
CBJ D. Severson1.310.47112%1
BUF R. McLeod1.320.37116%1
CBJ J. Danforth1.320.40018%0
CBJ M. Pyyhtia1.300.26012%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.340.3719%0
BUF B. Byram1.200.47011%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.200.29014%0
BUF H. Jokiharju1.210.2715%0
BUF M. Samuelsson1.110.1903%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.110.26210%1
BUF C. Clifton1.110.2505%0
BUF P. Krebs0.900.2709%0
CBJ J. Harris0.800.2607%0
CBJ J. Christiansen0.810.1924%0
BUF B. Malenstyn0.810.1707%0
BUF S. Lafferty0.800.22011%0
CBJ J. Johnson0.800.1403%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese0.720.1317%1

Shots on goal: 20 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.4 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.