Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
BUF5
FinalThu, Mar 5, 2026Every game that night
PIT1

BUF beat PIT 5-1, and the chances backed it up: 3.53 expected goals to 2.63. J. Norris led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). U. Luukkonen stopped 27 of 28.

Team Stats

BUFPIT
26Shots on goal28
3.53Expected goals2.63
59Shot attempts56
135v5 shots on goal20
1/6Power play0/5
20Hits18
11Blocked shots11
10Penalty minutes23
13Giveaways17
3Takeaways2

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

BUF 3.53 xGPIT 2.63 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdBUF goal, 12:00PIT goal, 14:48BUF goal, 4:10BUF goal, 6:18BUF goal, 10:30

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

BUF25 on goal, 4 scored
PIT28 on goal, 1 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

BUF Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. NorrisC1122000017:416:58
T. ThompsonC0111210018:437:50
J. DoanRW0113000018:287:07
R. McLeodC101100+2218:233:49
A. TuchRW101311+2017:373:43
N. OstlundC011100+2016:423:17
B. MalenstynLW0000520214:250:04
J. ZuckerLW000101-1014:117:38
Z. BensonLW000021+1013:220:02
J. QuinnRW000200+1011:492:46
P. KrebsC0001410210:350:00
J. DunneC000120008:370:00
O. PowerD112111+3020:451:28
B. ByramD0112000022:325:10
M. SamuelssonD101103+3021:190:00
R. DahlinD000410+1421:294:55
M. KesselringD0002100012:580:00
Z. MetsaD0000100011:000:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
U. Luukkonen28271.96459:24Win
C. Ellis000–0:00

PIT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. RustRW101500+1019:537:10
B. KindelC011010-2214:522:13
R. RakellRW000220-1018:347:13
E. ChinakhovRW000110-4017:276:00
B. LizotteC0002110016:441:02
A. ManthaRW000200-1015:587:13
N. AcciariC0002120215:270:01
T. NovakC000100-2015:031:54
C. DewarC0002300014:430:00
J. BrazeauRW000320-1014:132:05
A. HayesRW000200-2012:430:37
E. MalkinC0001000175:542:28
E. KarlssonD000301-1223:057:09
R. SheaD000102+1018:300:00
S. GirardD000013-1018:020:10
C. CliftonD0000220017:550:00
K. LetangD000130-3017:092:14
P. WotherspoonD000010-1014:540:05
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Silovs25214.84055:54Loss
S. Skinner000–0:00

Lines at 5-on-5

BUF

Line 1J. Doan10:31N. Ostlund11:42J. Norris9:44
Line 2T. Thompson9:22P. Krebs9:26A. Tuch8:46
Line 4R. McLeod9:07J. Quinn8:22J. Zucker6:03
Pair 1Z. Metsa10:44B. Byram12:41
Pair 2R. Dahlin12:01M. Kesselring11:14
Pair 3M. Samuelsson13:05O. Power12:41

PIT

Line 1B. Lizotte10:43N. Acciari8:58C. Dewar9:10
Line 3A. Mantha7:07J. Brazeau10:37B. Kindel9:00
Line 4T. Novak11:58A. Hayes10:13
Pair 1R. Shea11:49C. Clifton11:22
Pair 2K. Letang12:44S. Girard14:24

From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreBUF 3.1, PIT 3.5BUF 5, PIT 1
Total goals6.66
Shots on goalBUF 25.9, PIT 31.9BUF 26, PIT 28
Win chancePIT 58%BUF won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
BUF T. Thompson3.410.95139%0
PIT R. Rakell2.820.75029%0
PIT E. Malkin2.810.93028%0
PIT B. Rust2.750.83132%1
BUF R. Dahlin2.640.83018%0
BUF A. Tuch2.430.77130%1
PIT E. Chinakhov2.310.51022%0
PIT B. Kindel2.300.49121%0
PIT E. Karlsson2.230.68013%0
BUF J. Quinn2.020.58019%0
BUF J. Doan2.030.57122%0
BUF J. Zucker1.910.58023%0
PIT A. Mantha1.920.69025%0
PIT T. Novak1.810.56022%0
PIT K. Letang1.810.4609%0
BUF O. Power1.710.3927%1
PIT A. Hayes1.620.34016%0
PIT C. Dewar1.620.36015%0
PIT J. Brazeau1.630.43019%0
BUF J. Norris1.520.56226%1
BUF Z. Benson1.500.41013%0
BUF M. Samuelsson1.410.3919%1
BUF R. McLeod1.310.61118%1
PIT N. Acciari1.320.25012%0
BUF B. Byram1.220.47112%0
BUF P. Krebs1.110.39012%0
BUF M. Kesselring1.120.1704%0
BUF N. Ostlund1.010.39116%0
PIT S. Girard1.000.3005%0
PIT B. Lizotte1.020.38015%0
PIT R. Shea1.010.3106%0
PIT P. Wotherspoon1.000.2403%0
PIT C. Clifton0.900.2405%0
BUF J. Dunne0.910.1307%0
BUF B. Malenstyn0.800.1507%0
BUF Z. Metsa0.600.1304%0

Shots on goal: 26 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.