Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
NHL Scores and Recaps

8 games

TOR2
NYR6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
TOR1102
NYR1146
3.04Expected goals3.49
32Shots on goal24
54Shot attempts64
  1. A. Lafrenière NYR1 G, 2 A, 3 SOG
  2. M. Zibanejad NYR1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  3. W. Cuylle NYR2 G, 5 SOG

I. Shesterkin NYR30 saves on 32, the win

We had NYR at 56% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection.

UTA3
PHI0
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
UTA0213
PHI0000
2.83Expected goals1.66
23Shots on goal16
54Shot attempts46
  1. N. Schmaltz UTA1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. D. Guenther UTA2 A, 0 SOG
  3. C. Keller UTA1 G, 4 SOG

V. Vanecek UTA16 saves on 16, the win

We had UTA at 55% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection.

BUF5
PIT1
Final
3.53Expected goals2.63
26Shots on goal28
59Shot attempts56
  1. J. Norris BUF1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. O. Power BUF1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG
  3. B. Rust PIT1 G, 5 SOG

U. Luukkonen BUF27 saves on 28, the win

We had PIT at 58% to win; BUF won. Shots on goal: 26 of 36 players within one of their projection.

FLA2
CBJ4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
FLA0022
CBJ1124
3.27Expected goals3.51
28Shots on goal28
75Shot attempts48
  1. I. Provorov CBJ1 G, 2 A, 4 SOG
  2. M. Olivier CBJ2 G, 3 SOG
  3. A. Ekblad FLA2 A, 0 SOG

J. Greaves CBJ26 saves on 28, the win

We had CBJ at 51% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection.

BOS3
NSH6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
BOS0123
NSH1416
2.54Expected goals3.84
23Shots on goal29
59Shot attempts48
  1. F. Forsberg NSH1 G, 2 A, 6 SOG
  2. M. Wood NSH2 G, 3 SOG
  3. V. Arvidsson BOS1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG

J. Saros NSH20 saves on 23, the win

We had BOS at 52% to win; NSH won. Shots on goal: 25 of 34 players within one of their projection.

TBL1
WPG4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
TBL0011
WPG0224
2.58Expected goals4.32
27Shots on goal30
59Shot attempts63
  1. M. Scheifele WPG1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  2. K. Connor WPG1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  3. A. Iafallo WPG2 A, 3 SOG

C. Hellebuyck WPG26 saves on 27, the win

We had TBL at 55% to win; WPG won. Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection.

OTT4
CGY1
Final
4.04Expected goals1.59
37Shots on goal20
72Shot attempts45
  1. S. Pinto OTT1 G, 4 SOG
  2. T. Stützle OTT1 G, 4 SOG
  3. D. Cozens OTT1 G, 2 SOG

L. Ullmark OTT19 saves on 20, the win

We had OTT at 56% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection.

NYI3
LAK5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NYI0123
LAK1225
3.85Expected goals4.24
35Shots on goal35
79Shot attempts71
  1. A. Kempe LAK1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  2. A. Panarin LAK1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  3. M. Anderson LAK1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG

D. Kuemper LAK32 saves on 35, the win

We had LAK at 56% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 34 players within one of their projection.