Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CBJ2
FinalSun, Nov 10, 2024Every game that night
ANA4

ANA beat CBJ 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.40 expected goals to 3.03. CBJ outshot ANA 40 to 30. K. Marchenko led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). Z. Werenski had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 3.3. J. Gibson stopped 38 of 40.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CBJ1012
ANA1124
  1. 1st 3:13ANAB. Leason0.14 xG
  2. 1st 16:16CBJE. ChinakhovPP0.06 xG
  3. 2nd 4:22ANAJ. LaCombe0.21 xG
  4. 3rd 10:20ANAL. Carlsson0.17 xG
  5. 3rd 16:57CBJK. Marchenko0.21 xG
  6. 3rd 18:20ANAI. LundestromEN0.94 xG

Team Stats

CBJANA
40Shots on goal30
3.03Expected goals4.40
83Shot attempts60
305v5 shots on goal22
1/2Power play0/2
18Hits20
16Blocked shots21
4Penalty minutes4
8Giveaways16
8Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CBJ 3.03 xGANA 4.40 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdANA goal, 3:13CBJ goal, 16:16ANA goal, 4:22ANA goal, 10:20CBJ goal, 16:57ANA goal, 18:20

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CBJ38 on goal, 2 scored
ANA30 on goal, 4 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. MarchenkoRW1125200021:071:44
E. ChinakhovRW101740-1019:451:45
A. FantilliC0000110021:390:44
C. SillingerC000412-1020:271:43
S. MonahanC000000-1019:071:42
D. VoronkovLW000121-2016:130:47
J. DanforthRW000222-1213:100:45
M. OlivierRW000111-1212:130:00
M. PyyhtiaLW000103-1011:540:00
J. van RiemsdykLW000100-109:330:00
S. KuralyC000320-108:220:00
Z. Aston-ReeseLW000120-108:140:00
Z. WerenskiD011803-1027:571:41
D. SeversonD000101+1024:420:46
I. ProvorovD000100-1021:220:48
J. ChristiansenD000001-2015:490:00
J. JohnsonD000201-1014:010:00
J. HarrisD000210-1012:180:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Tarasov29263.89758:07Loss
E. Merzlikins000–0:00

ANA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
F. VatranoRW011343+2021:472:37
T. TerryRW011401+1020:492:34
R. StromeC011101+1015:571:27
L. CarlssonC101100+1015:442:35
I. LundestromC101302+1015:040:00
B. McGinnLW0110430013:200:00
B. LeasonRW1011100010:230:00
C. GauthierLW011300+109:301:22
R. JohnstonLW011100+107:580:00
T. ZegrasC0001100222:052:39
A. KillornLW000011+1215:011:21
R. FabbriC0001210013:461:24
R. GudasD011152+1022:180:00
J. LaCombeD101302+1021:520:00
B. DumoulinD011201+2021:090:00
P. MintyukovD000311+2022:141:25
O. ZellwegerD0002120017:522:36
U. VaakanainenD0000010010:420:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Gibson40382.95060:00Win
L. Dostal000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCBJ 3.2, ANA 3.3CBJ 2, ANA 4
Total goals6.66
Shots on goalCBJ 31.7, ANA 30.7CBJ 40, ANA 30
Win chanceANA 51%ANA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
ANA F. Vatrano3.330.74133%0
CBJ Z. Werenski3.380.84117%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.450.63228%1
ANA T. Terry2.440.91133%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.400.59021%0
ANA C. Gauthier2.430.45115%0
CBJ S. Monahan2.400.70024%0
CBJ C. Sillinger2.440.51018%0
CBJ E. Chinakhov2.470.57122%1
ANA T. Zegras2.210.72025%0
ANA A. Killorn2.100.69028%0
ANA O. Zellweger2.020.43010%0
ANA L. Carlsson2.010.58124%1
CBJ D. Voronkov2.010.44020%0
ANA R. Strome1.810.58119%0
ANA R. Fabbri1.710.59028%0
CBJ J. Danforth1.720.47019%0
CBJ D. Severson1.610.50012%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.610.4209%0
ANA P. Mintyukov1.530.4709%0
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.410.38014%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.310.26013%0
ANA R. Gudas1.210.2615%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.210.32013%0
ANA B. Dumoulin1.220.2815%0
ANA B. Leason1.210.29114%1
CBJ J. Christiansen1.200.2504%0
ANA B. McGinn1.100.28115%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.130.25012%0
CBJ M. Pyyhtia1.010.20010%0
ANA U. Vaakanainen1.000.2202%0
ANA I. Lundestrom0.930.29114%1
ANA J. LaCombe0.930.2614%1
CBJ J. Johnson0.820.1403%0
CBJ J. Harris0.720.2105%0
ANA R. Johnston0.610.1516%0

Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.