Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CBJ5
FinalMon, Nov 18, 2024Every game that night
BOS1

CBJ beat BOS 5-1, with the chances close: 2.46 expected goals to 2.83. S. Monahan led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). S. Monahan had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 2.3. E. Merzlikins stopped 28 of 29.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CBJ3025
BOS0101
  1. 1st 5:17CBJD. Voronkov0.11 xG
  2. 1st 10:39CBJM. OlivierSH0.25 xG
  3. 1st 19:28CBJJ. van Riemsdyk0.19 xG
  4. 2nd 14:30BOSC. CoylePP0.15 xG
  5. 3rd 7:19CBJJ. DanforthSH0.19 xG
  6. 3rd 14:10CBJE. Chinakhov0.11 xG

Team Stats

CBJBOS
28Shots on goal29
2.46Expected goals2.83
45Shot attempts65
235v5 shots on goal22
0/2Power play1/6
22Hits13
21Blocked shots10
19Penalty minutes11
16Giveaways17
1Takeaways7

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CBJ 2.46 xGBOS 2.83 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdCBJ goal, 5:17CBJ goal, 10:39CBJ goal, 19:28BOS goal, 14:30CBJ goal, 7:19CBJ goal, 14:10

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CBJ28 on goal, 5 scored
BOS29 on goal, 1 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
S. MonahanC022520+2018:492:33
C. SillingerC011121+1017:120:00
J. DanforthRW101132+1016:310:00
A. FantilliC011251+2015:182:34
D. VoronkovLW101100+1213:412:18
E. ChinakhovRW101111+1012:440:00
M. OlivierRW101131+1912:190:00
J. van RiemsdykLW101300+109:560:00
K. MarchenkoRW000301+2215:532:34
Z. Aston-ReeseLW0003120014:060:00
S. KuralyC0001000011:190:00
K. LabancRW000011+1010:450:01
Z. WerenskiD011302+1225:442:34
D. FabbroD011212+2222:090:00
D. SeversonD000015+3026:470:16
I. ProvorovD000100+4225:070:00
J. ChristiansenD0000110010:020:00
D.JiricekD000011008:140:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Merzlikins29281.96660:00Win
D. Tarasov000–0:00

BOS Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. CoyleC101421-2016:432:06
J. BrazeauRW011310-3013:122:15
E. LindholmC000211-1020:307:40
B. MarchandLW000310-1020:207:27
D. PastrnakRW000001-2017:567:36
P. ZachaC000000-2017:277:13
T. FredericC0002100015:360:31
G. MerkulovC000210-3015:202:00
T. JohnsonC0003010014:290:11
J. BeecherC0000000011:530:02
M. GeekieC000300-3010:581:49
J. VielLW000030078:290:02
M. LohreiD011000-4016:552:08
C. McAvoyD000311-1424:407:40
N. ZadorovD0001000018:590:34
A. PeekeD0002000018:550:36
J. OesterleD000101-1016:530:00
B. CarloD000024-2015:210:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Swayman28235.82159:24Loss
J. Korpisalo000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamCharlie Coyle CBJ Faces BOS, his team until Mar 20251 G, 4 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCBJ 2.8, BOS 3.4CBJ 5, BOS 1
Total goals6.26
Shots on goalCBJ 30.1, BOS 30.3CBJ 28, BOS 29
Win chanceBOS 60%CBJ won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
BOS D. Pastrnak4.501.37049%0
CBJ Z. Werenski2.930.67113%0
BOS B. Marchand2.530.94031%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.530.56025%0
CBJ S. Monahan2.350.61221%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.220.49118%0
CBJ C. Sillinger2.210.40115%0
CBJ E. Chinakhov2.110.46118%1
BOS P. Zacha2.100.79025%0
CBJ D. Voronkov2.010.40118%1
BOS E. Lindholm2.020.72027%0
BOS C. McAvoy1.930.67013%0
BOS J. Brazeau1.830.49123%0
CBJ J. Danforth1.710.39116%1
BOS M. Geekie1.730.52020%0
BOS C. Coyle1.640.61123%1
BOS N. Zadorov1.610.38011%0
BOS T. Frederic1.620.49021%0
BOS T. Johnson1.530.47019%0
CBJ D. Severson1.500.39010%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.330.24012%0
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.330.32112%1
BOS B. Carlo1.300.2507%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.210.3006%0
BOS M. Lohrei1.200.4219%0
CBJ K. Labanc1.200.30010%0
CBJ D. Fabbro1.120.1814%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.110.25110%1
CBJ J. Christiansen1.100.1903%0
BOS G. Merkulov1.120.32013%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.010.22010%0
BOS J. Oesterle1.010.1904%0
BOS J. Viel1.000.18011%0
BOS J. Beecher0.800.28014%0
BOS A. Peeke0.820.1704%0
CBJ D.Jiricek0.700.1502%0

Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.