Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CBJ1
FinalSat, Nov 16, 2024Every game that night
MTL5

MTL beat CBJ 5-1, and the chances backed it up: 2.11 expected goals to 1.23. M. Matheson led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). D. Fabbro had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.0. S. Montembeault stopped 25 of 26.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CBJ0101
MTL1135
  1. 1st 4:59MTLM. MathesonPP0.12 xG
  2. 2nd 7:40CBJD. Fabbro0.06 xG
  3. 2nd 15:49MTLN. Suzuki0.07 xG
  4. 3rd 11:04MTLL. Condotta0.20 xG
  5. 3rd 12:52MTLJ. Evans0.08 xG
  6. 3rd 15:55MTLJ. Anderson0.12 xG

Team Stats

CBJMTL
26Shots on goal30
1.23Expected goals2.11
53Shot attempts48
215v5 shots on goal23
0/4Power play1/4
18Hits21
12Blocked shots17
13Penalty minutes13
18Giveaways7
5Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CBJ 1.23 xGMTL 2.11 xGGoal

00.511.522.51st2nd3rdMTL goal, 4:59CBJ goal, 7:40MTL goal, 15:49MTL goal, 11:04MTL goal, 12:52MTL goal, 15:55

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CBJ25 on goal, 1 scored
MTL30 on goal, 5 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. LabancRW0110000210:531:07
S. MonahanC0001100220:503:09
K. MarchenkoRW000230-1019:283:28
A. FantilliC000310-1217:203:30
C. SillingerC000120-2015:541:57
D. VoronkovLW0002010015:531:26
J. DanforthRW000130-2014:531:52
E. ChinakhovRW000022-1014:123:11
M. PyyhtiaLW000100-1013:461:03
Z. Aston-ReeseLW0002110012:090:49
S. KuralyC0003000010:551:09
M. OlivierRW0001120510:320:45
Z. WerenskiD0111020026:004:23
D. FabbroD1014300022:021:17
I. ProvorovD000101-2020:561:24
D. SeversonD000201-2220:351:24
J. ChristiansenD000102-1013:530:35
J. HarrisD000010-1013:250:43
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Tarasov30255.83359:08Loss
E. Merzlikins000–0:00

MTL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. ArmiaRW022021+1215:510:57
C. CaufieldRW022213+1215:364:54
N. SuzukiC101200+1020:214:52
K. DachC011220+1019:044:53
J. EvansC1013100017:220:02
J. AndersonRW101140+1015:230:00
L. CondottaLW101100+106:070:00
J. SlafkovskýLW0001200016:564:42
C. DvorakC0001110015:470:00
B. GallagherRW0003010014:030:57
A. NewhookC000120+2012:551:01
E. HeinemanLW000230028:590:56
M. MathesonD1123020027:124:47
L. HutsonD0112020022:500:53
A. XhekajD011112+2515:570:00
K. GuhleD000114+2021:390:15
J. StrubleD000211+2213:180:11
J. BarronD0002000012:480:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
S. Montembeault26251.96260:00Win
C. Primeau000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamSean Monahan CBJ Faces MTL, his team until Jan 20241 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCBJ 3.3, MTL 3.5CBJ 1, MTL 5
Total goals6.76
Shots on goalCBJ 31.1, MTL 29.4CBJ 26, MTL 30
Win chanceMTL 54%MTL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
MTL C. Caufield3.420.88238%0
CBJ Z. Werenski3.210.85115%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.520.64029%0
CBJ S. Monahan2.310.70025%0
CBJ C. Sillinger2.310.47018%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.330.57022%0
CBJ E. Chinakhov2.300.56022%0
MTL M. Matheson2.330.81214%1
MTL N. Suzuki2.221.00132%1
MTL B. Gallagher2.130.54023%0
CBJ D. Voronkov2.020.46022%0
MTL K. Dach1.920.62120%0
MTL J. Armia1.900.43220%0
MTL J. Slafkovský1.910.72022%0
CBJ J. Danforth1.810.46019%0
MTL J. Anderson1.710.40120%1
CBJ D. Severson1.620.50011%0
MTL A. Newhook1.610.55022%0
MTL K. Guhle1.410.4209%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.420.28014%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.410.4007%0
CBJ K. Labanc1.300.34112%0
MTL C. Dvorak1.310.48017%0
MTL A. Xhekaj1.210.2016%0
MTL J. Barron1.220.31011%0
CBJ J. Christiansen1.210.2603%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.210.30013%0
MTL L. Hutson1.220.6216%0
MTL E. Heineman1.120.33015%0
MTL J. Evans1.130.48114%1
MTL L. Condotta1.110.22112%1
CBJ S. Kuraly1.130.25012%0
CBJ D. Fabbro1.040.2013%1
CBJ M. Pyyhtia1.010.18010%0
MTL J. Struble1.020.2205%0
CBJ J. Harris0.700.2104%0

Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.