Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CBJ4
Final/SOTue, Jan 7, 2025Every game that night
PIT3

CBJ beat PIT 4-3 in a shootout, with the chances close: 1.76 expected goals to 1.89. R. Rakell led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). D. Fabbro had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.4. E. Merzlikins stopped 20 of 23.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdSOT
CBJ10214
PIT01203
  1. 1st 3:20CBJD. VoronkovPP0.21 xG
  2. 2nd 0:51PITM. BuntingPP0.17 xG
  3. 3rd 0:24PITR. Rakell0.04 xG
  4. 3rd 10:09PITR. Rakell0.14 xG
  5. 3rd 12:05CBJD. Voronkov0.05 xG
  6. 3rd 17:24CBJA. FantilliPP0.11 xG

Team Stats

CBJPIT
29Shots on goal23
1.76Expected goals1.89
52Shot attempts65
245v5 shots on goal19
2/2Power play1/1
10Hits16
23Blocked shots11
2Penalty minutes4
17Giveaways14
8Takeaways0

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CBJ 1.76 xGPIT 1.89 xGGoal

00.511.521st2nd3rdOTCBJ goal, 3:20PIT goal, 0:51PIT goal, 0:24PIT goal, 10:09CBJ goal, 12:05CBJ goal, 17:24

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CBJ27 on goal, 3 scored
PIT23 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. MarchenkoRW0221000021:001:42
D. VoronkovLW2023210220:501:42
A. FantilliC112311+1019:141:15
K. JohnsonC011100-1017:011:42
S. MonahanC011200-1012:260:27
C. SillingerC000111-1016:400:00
S. KuralyC0000310015:430:00
Z. Aston-ReeseLW0001210014:490:00
M. OlivierRW0002010013:410:00
J. van RiemsdykLW000000-1013:170:00
M. PyyhtiaLW0002010011:370:00
K. LabancRW0002010011:110:00
Z. WerenskiD011101-2029:191:42
D. FabbroD000415-1025:560:00
I. ProvorovD000302-1023:540:00
D. MateychukD0003030021:410:00
J. JohnsonD000000+1013:130:00
J. ChristiansenD000004+1011:500:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Merzlikins23203.87064:55Win
D. Tarasov000–0:00

PIT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
S. CrosbyC022110+1020:481:43
R. RakellRW202420+1019:461:43
M. BuntingLW1013100014:531:43
B. RustRW000001+1019:431:43
D. O'ConnorLW0003200015:460:00
N. AcciariC0000110015:450:00
K. HayesRW0003110014:580:00
C. GlassC0000100014:220:00
M. NietoLW0000010013:530:00
J. PuljujarviRW0001000013:370:00
B. LizotteC0000010213:150:00
A. BeauvillierRW0001400013:080:00
E. KarlssonD0224030224:400:51
M. GrzelcykD0110010022:390:52
K. LetangD000110+1022:570:00
M. PetterssonD000000+1022:010:00
P. JosephD0001200016:170:00
O. PickeringD0001020014:500:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
T. Jarry29263.89765:00OT loss
A. Nedeljkovic000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCBJ 3.3, PIT 3.5CBJ 4, PIT 3
Total goals6.87
Shots on goalCBJ 30.8, PIT 31.9CBJ 29, PIT 23
Win chancePIT 54%CBJ won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CBJ Z. Werenski3.610.98118%0
PIT S. Crosby3.111.32238%0
CBJ K. Marchenko3.010.89233%0
PIT B. Rust3.001.01036%0
PIT R. Rakell2.640.86232%2
PIT E. Karlsson2.640.82216%0
CBJ D. Voronkov2.530.80232%2
CBJ S. Monahan2.520.90127%0
PIT K. Letang2.310.64014%0
CBJ C. Sillinger2.310.50017%0
PIT M. Bunting2.230.81128%1
CBJ K. Johnson1.810.65122%0
PIT J. Puljujarvi1.710.34014%0
CBJ A. Fantilli1.730.46218%1
PIT C. Glass1.700.45016%0
PIT D. O'Connor1.530.39017%0
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.500.45017%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.410.30014%0
PIT K. Hayes1.430.38015%0
CBJ D. Fabbro1.440.2906%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.320.39016%0
PIT M. Grzelcyk1.300.4115%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.330.4308%0
PIT A. Beauvillier1.310.30013%0
PIT P. Joseph1.210.2506%0
PIT M. Pettersson1.200.3805%0
PIT B. Lizotte1.200.43017%0
PIT N. Acciari1.100.27015%0
PIT M. Nieto1.000.28012%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.000.25011%0
CBJ K. Labanc0.920.2609%0
CBJ M. Pyyhtia0.820.1909%0
CBJ D. Mateychuk0.730.2305%0
CBJ J. Christiansen0.600.1202%0
PIT O. Pickering0.610.1806%0
CBJ J. Johnson0.600.1002%0

Shots on goal: 13 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.