Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CBJ2
FinalTue, Nov 12, 2024Every game that night
SEA5

SEA beat CBJ 5-2 despite fewer good chances: 2.98 expected goals to 3.76. J. McCann led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). J. Christiansen had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 1.0. J. Daccord stopped 38 of 40.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CBJ2002
SEA0415
  1. 1st 13:46CBJS. Kuraly0.42 xG
  2. 1st 14:08CBJZ. Aston-Reese0.02 xG
  3. 2nd 2:50SEAT. Kartye0.16 xG
  4. 2nd 7:13SEAB. Tanev0.14 xG
  5. 2nd 7:23SEAE. TolvanenPP0.09 xG
  6. 2nd 13:34SEAW. Borgen0.06 xG
  7. 3rd 18:42SEAJ. McCannEN0.59 xG

Team Stats

CBJSEA
40Shots on goal33
3.76Expected goals2.98
77Shot attempts57
335v5 shots on goal28
0/1Power play1/3
25Hits14
13Blocked shots16
6Penalty minutes0
15Giveaways18
2Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CBJ 3.76 xGSEA 2.98 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdCBJ goal, 13:46CBJ goal, 14:08SEA goal, 2:50SEA goal, 7:13SEA goal, 7:23SEA goal, 13:34SEA goal, 18:42

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CBJ40 on goal, 2 scored
SEA32 on goal, 5 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
Z. Aston-ReeseLW112362+2013:220:00
S. KuralyC112241+2011:490:00
K. LabancRW022010+2211:010:00
S. MonahanC000300-1018:451:17
K. MarchenkoRW000400-1018:331:16
A. FantilliC000231-1016:121:23
E. ChinakhovRW000221-1015:491:08
D. VoronkovLW000000-1015:020:25
C. SillingerC0004000014:590:18
J. DanforthRW000500-3014:280:22
M. PyyhtiaLW000202-3013:540:00
M. OlivierRW000061-3013:480:00
Z. WerenskiD000212-1028:051:19
I. ProvorovD000201-2221:020:24
D. SeversonD000201-2019:550:33
D. FabbroD0001100219:170:00
J. JohnsonD000001+1016:070:00
J. ChristiansenD000610+1014:150:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Merzlikins32284.87559:31Loss
D. Tarasov000–0:00

SEA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. McCannLW1126000017:162:38
J. EberleRW0222010015:122:31
Y. GourdeC011100+1016:510:00
O. BjorkstrandRW011321+1016:460:10
E. TolvanenRW1013200016:342:29
J. SchwartzLW011310+1015:521:10
B. TanevLW1013030014:340:00
A. BurakovskyLW011200+1012:471:06
T. KartyeLW101130+1011:090:00
C. StephensonC000102+1016:262:26
M. BeniersC0000000015:391:20
S. WrightC0000210012:120:49
R. EvansD011001+1022:100:40
W. BorgenD1012220016:110:00
B. MontourD0003020022:193:22
A. LarssonD000121+2021:290:14
J. OleksiakD0001010020:180:00
J. MahuraD000101+1014:150:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Daccord40382.95060:00Win
A. Stezka000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCBJ 3.0, SEA 3.4CBJ 2, SEA 5
Total goals6.47
Shots on goalCBJ 28.6, SEA 31.1CBJ 40, SEA 33
Win chanceSEA 57%SEA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CBJ Z. Werenski3.020.71014%0
SEA J. McCann2.861.00237%1
SEA B. Montour2.830.71017%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.340.60027%0
CBJ E. Chinakhov2.320.54021%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.220.55021%0
CBJ C. Sillinger2.240.46017%0
CBJ S. Monahan2.130.63023%0
SEA O. Bjorkstrand2.130.63123%0
SEA J. Schwartz2.030.61125%0
SEA J. Eberle2.020.68225%0
CBJ D. Voronkov1.800.40019%0
SEA M. Beniers1.800.64024%0
SEA A. Burakovsky1.720.58120%0
SEA Y. Gourde1.710.51118%0
SEA A. Larsson1.610.2908%0
SEA E. Tolvanen1.530.46120%1
SEA R. Evans1.500.4219%0
CBJ J. Danforth1.550.40017%0
SEA C. Stephenson1.510.89025%0
SEA J. Oleksiak1.510.2906%0
CBJ D. Severson1.420.42010%0
SEA B. Tanev1.430.39119%1
CBJ I. Provorov1.320.3407%0
CBJ K. Labanc1.200.29211%0
SEA W. Borgen1.220.2714%1
SEA T. Kartye1.110.27114%1
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.130.22211%1
CBJ M. Olivier1.100.28012%0
CBJ J. Christiansen1.060.2003%0
SEA S. Wright0.900.34017%0
CBJ S. Kuraly0.920.21210%1
CBJ M. Pyyhtia0.920.1709%0
SEA J. Mahura0.910.2203%0
CBJ D. Fabbro0.810.1403%0
CBJ J. Johnson0.700.1102%0

Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.4 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.