Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CHI6
FinalSat, Mar 1, 2025Every game that night
ANA3

CHI beat ANA 6-3, with the chances close: 3.40 expected goals to 3.03. R. Donato led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). I. Lundestrom had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 0.9. A. Soderblom stopped 28 of 31.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CHI0336
ANA0213
  1. 2nd 7:48CHIW. Kaiser0.17 xG
  2. 2nd 8:33ANAL. Carlsson0.15 xG
  3. 2nd 10:24CHIP. MaroonPP0.12 xG
  4. 2nd 13:16CHIT. Teravainen0.14 xG
  5. 2nd 14:41ANAJ. LaCombe0.22 xG
  6. 3rd 4:53CHIL. Reichel0.25 xG
  7. 3rd 7:40CHIR. DonatoPP0.15 xG
  8. 3rd 10:56CHIR. Donato0.23 xG
  9. 3rd 17:16ANAL. Carlsson0.07 xG

Team Stats

CHIANA
24Shots on goal31
3.40Expected goals3.03
49Shot attempts64
195v5 shots on goal25
2/4Power play0/2
12Hits27
16Blocked shots10
10Penalty minutes14
14Giveaways16
8Takeaways1

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CHI 3.40 xGANA 3.03 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdCHI goal, 7:48ANA goal, 8:33CHI goal, 10:24CHI goal, 13:16ANA goal, 14:41CHI goal, 4:53CHI goal, 7:40CHI goal, 10:56ANA goal, 17:16

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CHI24 on goal, 6 scored
ANA31 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. TeravainenC123101+1019:183:30
R. DonatoC213200+2018:074:15
L. ReichelLW112102+1011:561:12
T. BertuzziLW011210-3020:174:15
I. MikheyevRW011411+3015:200:00
P. MaroonLW1011000011:291:06
C. SmithC011210+1010:561:17
C. BedardC000210-2021:284:21
F. NazarC0002100014:462:03
A. AthanasiouC000101-1014:020:00
L. SlaggertLW0001400011:570:00
C. DachC000010+1611:300:00
A. MartinezD0220110020:021:00
A. VlasicD011001+1023:534:33
W. KaiserD101202+1019:210:00
T. BrodieD011000+2010:250:00
C. MurphyD000315-2421:170:13
E. Del MastroD0000020019:560:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Soderblom31283.90360:00Win
P. Mrazek000–0:00

ANA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
F. VatranoRW022400+1417:532:35
L. CarlssonC202201+1015:581:24
R. StromeC0113120019:242:35
M. McTavishC0002000019:012:36
A. KillornLW0001010218:551:25
T. TerryRW0003000018:022:33
I. LundestromC000420-2015:120:00
S. ColangeloRW000230-1012:451:25
B. LeasonRW0001110010:450:00
C. GauthierLW000100-3010:381:07
J. HarkinsC0001300010:070:19
R. JohnstonLW000010049:220:00
J. LaCombeD101411+1024:502:34
B. DumoulinD011010-1017:550:00
R. GudasD000280+2222:590:00
J. TroubaD0001230021:170:00
P. MintyukovD000010-2016:181:27
D. HellesonD000031-1212:300:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Gibson24186.75060:00Loss
L. Dostal000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCHI 2.7, ANA 3.2CHI 6, ANA 3
Total goals5.89
Shots on goalCHI 26.4, ANA 31.1CHI 24, ANA 31
Win chanceANA 59%CHI won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
ANA F. Vatrano3.440.74233%0
CHI C. Bedard2.720.91027%0
CHI R. Donato2.720.70326%2
ANA T. Terry2.530.96032%0
ANA M. McTavish2.420.75027%0
ANA C. Gauthier2.210.49020%0
CHI T. Bertuzzi2.020.63126%0
ANA R. Strome2.030.68120%0
ANA J. LaCombe2.040.56111%1
ANA A. Killorn1.910.61025%0
CHI I. Mikheyev1.940.44121%0
CHI T. Teravainen1.810.74324%1
CHI F. Nazar1.720.51017%0
CHI C. Smith1.720.31115%0
ANA S. Colangelo1.620.25015%0
ANA L. Carlsson1.620.53221%2
ANA J. Trouba1.510.3206%0
CHI A. Athanasiou1.410.32014%0
ANA R. Gudas1.420.3005%0
ANA B. Leason1.410.32014%0
CHI A. Vlasic1.300.2914%0
CHI C. Murphy1.330.2606%0
CHI C. Dach1.300.32013%0
CHI A. Martinez1.300.2728%0
ANA D. Helleson1.200.2707%0
CHI L. Slaggert1.210.27013%0
CHI W. Kaiser1.220.1713%1
ANA P. Mintyukov1.100.3306%0
ANA J. Harkins1.110.22010%0
CHI L. Reichel1.010.27210%1
CHI P. Maroon1.010.2519%1
ANA B. Dumoulin1.000.2914%0
ANA I. Lundestrom0.940.28012%0
CHI E. Mastro0.700.2006%0
CHI T. Brodie0.600.2013%0
ANA R. Johnston0.400.1205%0

Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.