Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
NHL Scores and Recaps

13 games

NSH4
NYI7
Final
3.21Expected goals3.19
29Shots on goal35
57Shot attempts67
  1. B. Nelson NYI2 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  2. C. Sissons NSH1 G, 2 A, 1 SOG
  3. C. Smith NSH2 G, 3 SOG

I. Sorokin NYI25 saves on 29, the win

We had NYI at 55% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection.

TBL3
WSH1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
TBL1023
WSH0011
3.09Expected goals2.46
19Shots on goal21
32Shot attempts60
  1. B. Hagel TBL1 G, 4 SOG
  2. A. Ovechkin WSH1 G, 3 SOG
  3. M. Chaffee TBL1 G, 3 SOG

A. Vasilevskiy TBL20 saves on 21, the win

We had WSH at 51% to win; TBL won. Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection.

CGY0
FLA3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CGY0000
FLA0213
1.48Expected goals3.84
23Shots on goal42
41Shot attempts75
  1. E. Rodrigues FLA1 G, 1 A, 5 SOG
  2. S. Bennett FLA2 A, 5 SOG
  3. J. Gadjovich FLA1 G, 4 SOG

S. Bobrovsky FLA23 saves on 23, the win

We had FLA at 63% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection.

BOS3
PIT2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
BOS2013
PIT0022
2.73Expected goals3.14
26Shots on goal33
43Shot attempts69
  1. D. Pastrnak BOS1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  2. P. Zacha BOS2 A, 0 SOG
  3. R. Rakell PIT1 G, 5 SOG

J. Korpisalo BOS31 saves on 33, the win

We had BOS at 51% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection.

DET3
CBJ5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
DET0123
CBJ0325
2.70Expected goals4.28
46Shots on goal21
84Shot attempts45
  1. P. Kane DET1 G, 2 A, 5 SOG
  2. A. DeBrincat DET2 G, 6 SOG
  3. J. Danforth CBJ1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG

E. Merzlikins CBJ43 saves on 46, the win

We had DET at 51% to win; CBJ won. Shots on goal: 16 of 35 players within one of their projection.

MTL4
BUF2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
MTL0314
BUF0202
3.22Expected goals2.27
29Shots on goal25
57Shot attempts68
  1. C. Dvorak MTL2 A, 4 SOG
  2. L. Hutson MTL2 A, 2 SOG
  3. J.Kulich BUF1 G, 3 SOG

J. Dobes MTL23 saves on 25, the win

We had BUF at 55% to win; MTL won. Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection.

SJS3
OTT5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
SJS0213
OTT1045
2.85Expected goals3.53
37Shots on goal32
70Shot attempts65
  1. T. Stützle OTT1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  2. W. Smith SJS1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  3. M. Celebrini SJS2 A, 5 SOG

L. Ullmark OTT34 saves on 37, the win

We had OTT at 64% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection.

EDM3
CAR1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
EDM1113
CAR0011
4.77Expected goals4.98
31Shots on goal36
61Shot attempts68
  1. L. Draisaitl EDM2 A, 2 SOG
  2. C. Perry EDM1 G, 4 SOG
  3. S. Aho CAR1 G, 4 SOG

C. Pickard EDM35 saves on 36, the win

We had CAR at 55% to win; EDM won. Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection.

PHI2
WPG1
Final/SO
Team1st2nd3rdSOT
PHI01012
WPG10001
2.28Expected goals3.15
32Shots on goal30
60Shot attempts73
  1. M. Scheifele WPG1 G, 4 SOG
  2. J. Drysdale PHI1 G, 1 SOG
  3. N. Cates PHI1 A, 3 SOG

I. Fedotov PHI29 saves on 30, the win

We had WPG at 66% to win; PHI won. Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection.

LAK1
STL4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
LAK1001
STL2114
1.87Expected goals2.94
26Shots on goal34
63Shot attempts55
  1. D. Holloway STL1 G, 1 A, 5 SOG
  2. P. Buchnevich STL1 G, 4 SOG
  3. C. Parayko STL1 G, 3 SOG

J. Binnington STL25 saves on 26, the win

We had STL at 54% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection.

NJD3
UTA1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NJD1023
UTA0101
2.28Expected goals2.18
29Shots on goal25
59Shot attempts62
  1. T. Meier NJD1 G, 3 SOG
  2. C. Lazar NJD1 G, 2 SOG
  3. M. Sergachev UTA1 G, 2 SOG

N. Daws NJD24 saves on 25, the win

We had UTA at 54% to win; NJD won. Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection.

CHI6
ANA3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CHI0336
ANA0213
3.40Expected goals3.03
24Shots on goal31
49Shot attempts64
  1. R. Donato CHI2 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. T. Teravainen CHI1 G, 2 A, 1 SOG
  3. L. Carlsson ANA2 G, 2 SOG

A. Soderblom CHI28 saves on 31, the win

We had ANA at 59% to win; CHI won. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.

VAN3
SEA6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
VAN2103
SEA1326
3.13Expected goals2.43
31Shots on goal24
72Shot attempts53
  1. E. Tolvanen SEA2 G, 4 SOG
  2. B. Montour SEA1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  3. V. Dunn SEA2 A, 0 SOG

J. Daccord SEA28 saves on 31, the win

We had VAN at 50% to win; SEA won. Shots on goal: 12 of 36 players within one of their projection.