UTA beat COL 4-3 in overtime, with the chances close: 2.74 expected goals to 2.38. M. Sergachev led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). N. MacKinnon had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 3.8. K. Vejmelka stopped 30 of 33.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| UTA | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
- 1st 5:29COLC. Makar0.02 xG
- 2nd 9:17UTAN. SchmaltzPP0.36 xG
- 2nd 12:30UTAL. Crouse0.33 xG
- 3rd 1:10COLJ. Drury0.30 xG
- 3rd 5:20UTAM. Sergachev0.03 xG
- 3rd 17:44COLM. Necas0.04 xG
- OT 0:33UTAD. Guenther0.10 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
COL 2.38 xGUTA 2.74 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
COL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Necas | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 22:04 | 2:00 |
| J. Drury | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 14:22 | 0:02 |
| R. Colton | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:05 | 0:00 |
| P. Kelly | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 9:21 | 0:00 |
| Z. Bardakov | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5:57 | 0:00 |
| N. MacKinnon | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:51 | 2:00 |
| A. Lehkonen | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:46 | 0:00 |
| V. Nichushkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:17 | 0:00 |
| B. Nelson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:12 | 1:58 |
| G. Landeskog | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:38 | 0:00 |
| V. Olofsson | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:43 | 2:00 |
| G. Brindley | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8:25 | 0:00 |
| C. Makar | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 25:30 | 2:00 |
| D. Toews | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 25:14 | 0:00 |
| B. Burns | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21:23 | 0:00 |
| J. Manson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:53 | 0:00 |
| S. Malinski | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:56 | 0:00 |
| I. Solovyov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 12:34 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Wedgewood | 33 | 29 | 4 | .879 | 60:33 | OT loss |
| T. Miner | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
UTA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Keller | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:54 | 1:47 |
| K. Stenlund | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18:55 | 0:00 |
| N. Schmaltz | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 17:56 | 1:47 |
| D. Guenther | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:26 | 1:46 |
| L. Crouse | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:45 | 0:40 |
| M. Carcone | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:49 | 0:00 |
| L. Cooley | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:20 | 1:48 |
| B. Hayton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:11 | 0:41 |
| J. Peterka | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:48 | 0:42 |
| L. O'Brien | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:52 | 0:00 |
| B. Tanev | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:28 | 0:00 |
| J. McBain | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4:56 | 0:41 |
| M. Sergachev | D | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 24:56 | 1:54 |
| J. Marino | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22:49 | 0:00 |
| D. Simashev | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 20:00 | 0:00 |
| I. Cole | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19:56 | 0:00 |
| N. Schmidt | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:55 | 0:34 |
| O. Maatta | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 10:43 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Vejmelka | 33 | 30 | 3 | .909 | 60:33 | Win |
| V. Vanecek | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
COL
UTA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | COL 3.3, UTA 3.0 | COL 3, UTA 4 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | COL 28.5, UTA 27.1 | COL 33, UTA 33 |
| Win chance | COL 55% | UTA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL N. MacKinnon | 3.8 | 8 | 1.36 | 0 | 38% | 0 |
| UTA D. Guenther | 2.9 | 3 | 0.77 | 1 | 29% | 1 |
| COL C. Makar | 2.7 | 2 | 0.94 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| UTA C. Keller | 2.5 | 4 | 0.92 | 2 | 30% | 0 |
| COL M. Necas | 2.4 | 2 | 0.89 | 1 | 27% | 1 |
| UTA N. Schmaltz | 2.3 | 4 | 0.75 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| COL A. Lehkonen | 2.1 | 1 | 0.71 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| COL B. Nelson | 2.1 | 1 | 0.74 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| UTA L. Cooley | 2.0 | 2 | 0.73 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| COL V. Nichushkin | 2.0 | 1 | 0.61 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| UTA J. Peterka | 2.0 | 1 | 0.62 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| COL G. Landeskog | 1.8 | 1 | 0.69 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| COL B. Burns | 1.8 | 3 | 0.36 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| UTA B. Hayton | 1.7 | 1 | 0.44 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| COL V. Olofsson | 1.7 | 1 | 0.46 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| UTA M. Sergachev | 1.6 | 4 | 0.57 | 3 | 11% | 1 |
| UTA L. Crouse | 1.5 | 4 | 0.32 | 1 | 18% | 1 |
| COL R. Colton | 1.5 | 1 | 0.35 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| COL D. Toews | 1.4 | 2 | 0.47 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| COL S. Malinski | 1.4 | 3 | 0.22 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| COL J. Manson | 1.4 | 3 | 0.28 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| UTA J. McBain | 1.3 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| UTA K. Stenlund | 1.3 | 1 | 0.30 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| COL J. Drury | 1.2 | 2 | 0.27 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| UTA M. Carcone | 1.2 | 3 | 0.29 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmidt | 1.1 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| COL P. Kelly | 1.1 | 0 | 0.20 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| UTA D. Simashev | 1.0 | 3 | 0.11 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| UTA L. O'Brien | 1.0 | 3 | 0.14 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| UTA B. Tanev | 0.9 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| COL I. Solovyov | 0.9 | 2 | 0.17 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| COL G. Brindley | 0.8 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| UTA J. Marino | 0.7 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| UTA I. Cole | 0.6 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| UTA O. Maatta | 0.5 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 17 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.