PHI beat DAL 2-1 in overtime, with the chances close: 2.75 expected goals to 2.30. PHI outshot DAL 30 to 18. T. Konecny had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 2.1. S. Ersson stopped 17 of 18.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| PHI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
- 2nd 9:48PHIT. KonecnyPP0.24 xG
- 2nd 17:53DALA. HyrySH0.10 xG
- OT 3:27PHIT. Zegras0.16 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
DAL 2.30 xGPHI 2.75 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
DAL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Hyry | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 12:20 | 0:00 |
| W. Johnston | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 4 | 23:00 | 2:49 |
| M. Rantanen | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 21:24 | 2:51 |
| J. Robertson | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:55 | 2:53 |
| M. Bourque | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:02 | 1:11 |
| M. Duchene | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:20 | 2:52 |
| J. Hryckowian | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:37 | 1:09 |
| J. Benn | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:14 | 1:08 |
| O. Bäck | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:12 | 0:00 |
| C. Blackwell | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:25 | 0:00 |
| A. Erne | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:39 | 0:00 |
| M. Bunting | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3:46 | 0:00 |
| T. Harley | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 25:09 | 1:12 |
| M. Heiskanen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 24:07 | 2:48 |
| E. Lindell | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 23:01 | 1:07 |
| N. Lundkvist | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:56 | 0:00 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:33 | 0:00 |
| L. Bichsel | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:53 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. DeSmith | 30 | 28 | 2 | .933 | 63:27 | OT loss |
| J. Oettinger | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Konecny | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21:24 | 4:12 |
| T. Zegras | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 2 | 20:17 | 4:30 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:16 | 4:32 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:58 | 2:17 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:03 | 1:15 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:45 | 3:26 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:42 | 1:35 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14:31 | 0:03 |
| L. Glendening | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:27 | 0:00 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:18 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11:41 | 0:03 |
| A. Bump | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:46 | 0:00 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 24:12 | 0:07 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22:12 | 4:36 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 23:19 | 1:16 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 22:10 | 1:07 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:08 | 0:01 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:12 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
DAL
PHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | DAL 3.0, PHI 2.5 | DAL 1, PHI 2 |
| Total goals | 5.6 | 3 |
| Shots on goal | DAL 23.6, PHI 24.1 | DAL 18, PHI 30 |
| Win chance | DAL 58% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL J. Robertson | 3.2 | 5 | 1.12 | 0 | 39% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.9 | 2 | 0.63 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| DAL W. Johnston | 2.2 | 2 | 0.87 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| DAL M. Rantanen | 2.2 | 2 | 1.09 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.1 | 5 | 0.81 | 1 | 27% | 1 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.0 | 2 | 0.69 | 1 | 23% | 1 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 1.9 | 4 | 0.61 | 1 | 21% | 0 |
| DAL M. Heiskanen | 1.9 | 0 | 0.68 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| DAL M. Bourque | 1.8 | 1 | 0.53 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.8 | 2 | 0.57 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.7 | 1 | 0.33 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| DAL M. Duchene | 1.6 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| DAL T. Harley | 1.6 | 1 | 0.51 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.5 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| DAL M. Bunting | 1.4 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| DAL J. Benn | 1.4 | 1 | 0.64 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.4 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI A. Bump | 1.4 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.4 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.4 | 4 | 0.24 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.3 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.3 | 0 | 0.30 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| DAL J. Hryckowian | 1.1 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| DAL C. Blackwell | 1.1 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| DAL N. Lundkvist | 1.1 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| DAL A. Hyry | 1.0 | 2 | 0.18 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.0 | 3 | 0.14 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.0 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| DAL T. Myers | 1.0 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| DAL E. Lindell | 0.9 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| PHI L. Glendening | 0.8 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| DAL A. Erne | 0.8 | 2 | 0.18 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.8 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| DAL L. Bichsel | 0.7 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| DAL O. Bäck | 0.6 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 0.5 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.