ANA beat DET 5-2, with the chances close: 4.02 expected goals to 3.47. L. Carlsson led the way with 4 points (1 G, 3 A). A. DeBrincat had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 3.0. L. Dostal stopped 28 of 30.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| ANA | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
- 1st 4:53ANAT. TerrySH0.19 xG
- 1st 8:19DETL. Raymond0.20 xG
- 1st 12:24ANAL. Carlsson0.14 xG
- 2nd 6:35ANAM. McTavish0.10 xG
- 2nd 15:25DETA. DeBrincatPP0.20 xG
- 3rd 0:55ANAC. KreiderPP0.46 xG
- 3rd 17:28ANAT. TerryEN0.53 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
DET 3.47 xGANA 4.02 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
DET Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. DeBrincat | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:32 | 8:00 |
| L. Raymond | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:07 | 7:47 |
| D. Larkin | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:35 | 8:03 |
| E. Finnie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:14 | 7:50 |
| J. Compher | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:10 | 1:23 |
| M. Kasper | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 14:41 | 2:51 |
| A. Copp | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 14:34 | 2:04 |
| M. Appleton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:53 | 0:17 |
| J. van Riemsdyk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 13:31 | 2:38 |
| M. Rasmussen | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12:55 | 0:17 |
| E. Soderblom | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:13 | 0:17 |
| J. Berggren | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 11:48 | 1:55 |
| M. Seider | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 25:00 | 9:02 |
| S. Edvinsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 20:04 | 0:37 |
| B. Chiarot | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:17 | 0:09 |
| A. Sandin-Pellikka | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:50 | 1:52 |
| A. Johansson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15:45 | 0:08 |
| T. Hamonic | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:40 | 0:00 |
ANA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Carlsson | C | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 15:44 | 3:39 |
| T. Terry | RW | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 17:17 | 3:51 |
| C. Gauthier | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 2 | 18:21 | 3:51 |
| M. McTavish | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:24 | 1:40 |
| C. Kreider | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 13:28 | 3:49 |
| A. Killorn | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:58 | 1:29 |
| B. Sennecke | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 16:25 | 1:17 |
| R. Poehling | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:02 | 0:00 |
| N. Nesterenko | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:34 | 0:00 |
| F. Vatrano | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 10:49 | 0:15 |
| R. Johnston | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8:25 | 0:00 |
| S. Colangelo | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 8:22 | 0:00 |
| J. Trouba | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 26:25 | 0:59 |
| D. Helleson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:34 | 0:00 |
| O. Zellweger | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +2 | 2 | 16:23 | 0:50 |
| J. LaCombe | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23:58 | 3:30 |
| P. Mintyukov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:31 | 0:48 |
| I. Moore | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 10:22 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
DET
ANA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | DET 3.3, ANA 3.3 | DET 2, ANA 5 |
| Total goals | 6.5 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | DET 29.5, ANA 28.8 | DET 30, ANA 32 |
| Win chance | ANA 50% | ANA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA C. Gauthier | 3.5 | 6 | 0.81 | 2 | 30% | 0 |
| DET A. DeBrincat | 3.0 | 7 | 0.77 | 2 | 29% | 1 |
| DET D. Larkin | 2.9 | 3 | 0.94 | 1 | 34% | 0 |
| ANA M. McTavish | 2.5 | 2 | 0.78 | 1 | 27% | 1 |
| ANA T. Terry | 2.4 | 4 | 0.86 | 3 | 30% | 2 |
| ANA C. Kreider | 2.3 | 3 | 0.74 | 1 | 37% | 1 |
| ANA L. Carlsson | 2.2 | 2 | 0.85 | 4 | 28% | 1 |
| DET M. Seider | 2.2 | 2 | 0.53 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| ANA F. Vatrano | 2.2 | 3 | 0.50 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| DET L. Raymond | 2.1 | 3 | 0.78 | 2 | 24% | 1 |
| DET E. Finnie | 2.1 | 1 | 0.64 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| ANA O. Zellweger | 2.0 | 1 | 0.35 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| DET M. Kasper | 2.0 | 3 | 0.49 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| ANA J. LaCombe | 1.9 | 1 | 0.65 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| ANA A. Killorn | 1.8 | 1 | 0.57 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| ANA B. Sennecke | 1.6 | 2 | 0.54 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| ANA J. Trouba | 1.6 | 2 | 0.34 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| ANA N. Nesterenko | 1.5 | 2 | 0.41 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| DET B. Chiarot | 1.5 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| DET A. Sandin-Pellikka | 1.4 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| ANA D. Helleson | 1.4 | 0 | 0.36 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| DET J. Berggren | 1.4 | 2 | 0.39 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| DET J. Riemsdyk | 1.3 | 1 | 0.44 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| DET M. Appleton | 1.3 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| DET J. Compher | 1.3 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| DET T. Hamonic | 1.3 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| DET A. Copp | 1.3 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| DET S. Edvinsson | 1.3 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| DET E. Soderblom | 1.2 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| DET M. Rasmussen | 1.2 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| ANA S. Colangelo | 1.1 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| ANA R. Poehling | 1.0 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| ANA I. Moore | 1.0 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| ANA P. Mintyukov | 1.0 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| DET A. Johansson | 0.9 | 2 | 0.16 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| ANA R. Johnston | 0.4 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.