EDM beat UTA 5-2, and the chances backed it up: 3.40 expected goals to 1.73. EDM outshot UTA 26 to 18. E. Bouchard led the way with 3 points (0 G, 3 A). T. Jarry stopped 16 of 18.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| UTA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
- 1st 11:12UTAA. Kerfoot0.02 xG
- 1st 14:27EDMJ. Roslovic0.06 xG
- 2nd 11:24EDMM. SavoieSH0.14 xG
- 2nd 11:59UTAL. CrousePP0.22 xG
- 2nd 12:07EDMC. McDavid0.12 xG
- 2nd 15:04EDMJ. Roslovic0.05 xG
- 3rd 19:52EDMC. McDavidEN0.93 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
EDM 3.40 xGUTA 1.73 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 20:42 | 0:00 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 15:44 | 0:00 |
| Z. Hyman | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | +3 | 2 | 17:42 | 0:00 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | +3 | 0 | 17:08 | 0:00 |
| M. Savoie | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 17:04 | 0:00 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:04 | 0:00 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:44 | 0:00 |
| J. Dickinson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16:36 | 0:00 |
| K. Kapanen | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:03 | 0:00 |
| J. Samanski | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:43 | 0:00 |
| R. Jarventie | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 8:52 | 0:00 |
| M. Jones | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 8:32 | 0:00 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | +4 | 0 | 23:04 | 0:00 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +4 | 0 | 21:00 | 0:00 |
| J. Walman | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 17:43 | 0:00 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 21:42 | 0:00 |
| C. Murphy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 21:05 | 0:00 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 15:33 | 0:00 |
UTA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Crouse | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 19:14 | 1:17 |
| M. Carcone | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:40 | 1:17 |
| A. Kerfoot | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 12:23 | 0:13 |
| C. Keller | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 22:48 | 1:26 |
| D. Guenther | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 22:12 | 1:24 |
| L. Cooley | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 19:30 | 1:22 |
| N. Schmaltz | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 18:44 | 1:29 |
| J. McBain | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:30 | 1:17 |
| J. Peterka | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:45 | 1:17 |
| K. Yamamoto | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:38 | 0:18 |
| K. Stenlund | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 10:42 | 0:16 |
| B. Hayton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:17 | 0:00 |
| M. Weegar | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:58 | 1:17 |
| S. Durzi | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 18:07 | 0:32 |
| I. Cole | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15:17 | 0:20 |
| M. Sergachev | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -3 | 0 | 22:30 | 1:10 |
| J. Marino | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:48 | 0:00 |
| N. Schmidt | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 19:29 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Vejmelka | 15 | 11 | 4 | .733 | 40:00 | Loss |
| V. Vanecek | 10 | 10 | 0 | 1.000 | 17:28 |
Lines at 5-on-5
EDM
UTA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | EDM 3.1, UTA 3.2 | EDM 5, UTA 2 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | EDM 27.8, UTA 27.0 | EDM 26, UTA 18 |
| Win chance | UTA 51% | EDM won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.1 | 4 | 1.43 | 2 | 36% | 2 |
| UTA D. Guenther | 2.8 | 1 | 0.86 | 0 | 33% | 0 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.8 | 3 | 0.87 | 3 | 16% | 0 |
| UTA C. Keller | 2.7 | 4 | 1.03 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| EDM Z. Hyman | 2.7 | 0 | 0.78 | 1 | 37% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmaltz | 2.4 | 0 | 0.90 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| UTA B. Hayton | 1.9 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| UTA L. Crouse | 1.9 | 3 | 0.56 | 1 | 25% | 1 |
| UTA M. Carcone | 1.8 | 1 | 0.44 | 1 | 21% | 0 |
| UTA L. Cooley | 1.8 | 1 | 0.68 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 1.8 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 1.7 | 2 | 0.70 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| UTA M. Sergachev | 1.7 | 0 | 0.66 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| UTA J. Peterka | 1.7 | 1 | 0.56 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 1.6 | 4 | 0.44 | 2 | 18% | 2 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.6 | 3 | 0.42 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| UTA M. Weegar | 1.6 | 1 | 0.39 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| EDM J. Walman | 1.6 | 1 | 0.30 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 1.6 | 4 | 0.44 | 1 | 16% | 1 |
| EDM K. Kapanen | 1.6 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.5 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| UTA J. McBain | 1.3 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| UTA S. Durzi | 1.1 | 1 | 0.40 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| EDM J. Dickinson | 1.1 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| EDM C. Murphy | 1.0 | 2 | 0.19 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA K. Stenlund | 1.0 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.0 | 0 | 0.22 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| EDM M. Jones | 0.9 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| UTA A. Kerfoot | 0.9 | 2 | 0.34 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| UTA K. Yamamoto | 0.9 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmidt | 0.9 | 2 | 0.28 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM R. Jarventie | 0.7 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| UTA I. Cole | 0.7 | 0 | 0.22 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| UTA J. Marino | 0.7 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.6 | 1 | 0.14 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| EDM J. Samanski | 0.4 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.