UTA beat EDM 6-5 in overtime, and the chances backed it up: 4.00 expected goals to 2.56. N. Schmaltz led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). C. Dach had 3 shots on goal against our projection of 0.5. K. Vejmelka stopped 21 of 26.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| UTA | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
- 1st 1:53UTAJ. Peterka0.05 xG
- 1st 2:04EDMC. Lazar0.14 xG
- 1st 8:56EDMC. McDavidPP0.19 xG
- 1st 14:43EDMR. Nugent-Hopkins0.13 xG
- 2nd 10:28UTAN. Schmaltz0.16 xG
- 2nd 15:19UTAL. Cooley0.05 xG
- 2nd 16:06EDMV. Podkolzin0.26 xG
- 2nd 19:24UTAN. SchmaltzSH0.10 xG
- 3rd 2:09EDMC. Dach0.16 xG
- 3rd 12:56UTAA. Kerfoot0.08 xG
- OT 0:33UTAC. KellerPP0.14 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
EDM 2.56 xGUTA 4.00 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
EDM Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McDavid | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 22:05 | 2:58 |
| K. Kapanen | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:58 | 1:22 |
| R. Nugent-Hopkins | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 16:51 | 2:49 |
| V. Podkolzin | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:43 | 1:33 |
| J. Dickinson | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:20 | 0:00 |
| T. Frederic | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:44 | 0:00 |
| C. Dach | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:01 | 0:00 |
| A. Henrique | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:36 | 1:21 |
| C. Lazar | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:51 | 0:00 |
| M. Savoie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19:44 | 2:57 |
| J. Roslovic | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 17:12 | 2:49 |
| M. Jones | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 7:26 | 0:00 |
| D. Nurse | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 23:15 | 0:00 |
| E. Bouchard | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 22:33 | 3:47 |
| M. Ekholm | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:20 | 1:31 |
| C. Murphy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 23:44 | 0:00 |
| J. Walman | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 15:10 | 0:33 |
| T. Emberson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 2 | 13:06 | 0:00 |
UTA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Keller | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19:35 | 2:15 |
| N. Schmaltz | C | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:23 | 2:08 |
| D. Guenther | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:10 | 2:55 |
| A. Kerfoot | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:04 | 1:56 |
| M. Carcone | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:11 | 1:14 |
| L. Crouse | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21:01 | 1:57 |
| L. Cooley | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:28 | 2:02 |
| J. Peterka | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:37 | 1:53 |
| K. Yamamoto | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:10 | 0:00 |
| K. Stenlund | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:11 | 0:01 |
| B. Tanev | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 7:09 | 0:00 |
| S. Durzi | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:24 | 0:00 |
| M. Sergachev | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25:34 | 2:24 |
| J. Marino | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:36 | 0:03 |
| I. Cole | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 17:50 | 0:00 |
| M. Weegar | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 18:59 | 1:44 |
| N. Schmidt | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:13 | 0:00 |
| N. DeSimone | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 3:19 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Vejmelka | 26 | 21 | 5 | .808 | 60:06 | Win |
| V. Vanecek | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
EDM
UTA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | EDM 3.3, UTA 3.3 | EDM 5, UTA 6 |
| Total goals | 6.6 | 11 |
| Shots on goal | EDM 27.8, UTA 27.0 | EDM 26, UTA 31 |
| Win chance | UTA 51% | UTA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM C. McDavid | 3.1 | 4 | 1.46 | 2 | 37% | 1 |
| UTA D. Guenther | 2.8 | 4 | 0.86 | 2 | 33% | 0 |
| EDM E. Bouchard | 2.7 | 0 | 0.93 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| UTA C. Keller | 2.6 | 3 | 1.01 | 2 | 30% | 1 |
| UTA N. Schmaltz | 2.2 | 4 | 0.84 | 2 | 27% | 2 |
| EDM M. Savoie | 2.1 | 0 | 0.59 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| EDM D. Nurse | 2.0 | 2 | 0.31 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| UTA L. Cooley | 1.8 | 3 | 0.75 | 1 | 28% | 1 |
| EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins | 1.8 | 3 | 0.74 | 1 | 23% | 1 |
| UTA M. Carcone | 1.7 | 1 | 0.40 | 2 | 19% | 0 |
| EDM J. Roslovic | 1.7 | 0 | 0.49 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| EDM J. Walman | 1.6 | 2 | 0.32 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| UTA M. Sergachev | 1.6 | 3 | 0.68 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| UTA L. Crouse | 1.6 | 2 | 0.47 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| UTA J. Peterka | 1.6 | 3 | 0.52 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| EDM V. Podkolzin | 1.5 | 2 | 0.40 | 1 | 16% | 1 |
| UTA M. Weegar | 1.5 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| EDM M. Ekholm | 1.5 | 1 | 0.41 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM K. Kapanen | 1.5 | 2 | 0.37 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| EDM A. Henrique | 1.1 | 1 | 0.27 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| EDM C. Murphy | 1.0 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA S. Durzi | 1.0 | 0 | 0.34 | 2 | 7% | 0 |
| EDM J. Dickinson | 1.0 | 2 | 0.27 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| UTA A. Kerfoot | 1.0 | 1 | 0.38 | 2 | 13% | 1 |
| EDM M. Jones | 1.0 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmidt | 0.9 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| EDM T. Frederic | 0.9 | 2 | 0.18 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| UTA K. Stenlund | 0.9 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| UTA K. Yamamoto | 0.9 | 2 | 0.29 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| UTA N. DeSimone | 0.9 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA B. Tanev | 0.7 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| UTA I. Cole | 0.6 | 1 | 0.22 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| EDM C. Lazar | 0.6 | 1 | 0.14 | 1 | 7% | 1 |
| EDM T. Emberson | 0.6 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| UTA J. Marino | 0.6 | 1 | 0.35 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| EDM C. Dach | 0.5 | 3 | 0.12 | 1 | 5% | 1 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.