Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
MTL4
Final/OTWed, Nov 27, 2024Every game that night
CBJ3

MTL beat CBJ 4-3 in overtime, with the chances close: 3.01 expected goals to 2.32. Z. Werenski led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). C. Primeau stopped 21 of 24.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdOTT
MTL11114
CBJ11103
  1. 1st 9:08CBJM. Olivier0.27 xG
  2. 1st 13:00MTLJ. Slafkovský0.11 xG
  3. 2nd 4:27CBJE. Chinakhov0.26 xG
  4. 2nd 6:34MTLC. CaufieldPP0.09 xG
  5. 3rd 8:24MTLE. Heineman0.07 xG
  6. 3rd 12:22CBJZ. Werenski0.02 xG
  7. OT 0:44MTLN. Suzuki0.44 xG

Team Stats

MTLCBJ
23Shots on goal24
3.01Expected goals2.32
60Shot attempts54
175v5 shots on goal22
1/2Power play0/3
24Hits25
14Blocked shots16
13Penalty minutes11
9Giveaways14
5Takeaways2

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

MTL 3.01 xGCBJ 2.32 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdOTCBJ goal, 9:08MTL goal, 13:00CBJ goal, 4:27MTL goal, 6:34MTL goal, 8:24CBJ goal, 12:22MTL goal, 0:44

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

MTL23 on goal, 4 scored
CBJ24 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

MTL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. SlafkovskýLW1121110013:041:25
N. SuzukiC101200+1019:131:43
J. ArmiaRW011030+1017:311:09
C. CaufieldRW1015200016:551:28
J. EvansC011031+1016:440:00
E. HeinemanLW101120+1013:311:12
A. NewhookC000210-1016:120:54
K. DachC000120-1014:501:33
C. DvorakC000300-1013:480:00
J. AndersonRW000252-1212:440:00
B. GallagherRW0001100712:031:04
J. RoyRW000000-1011:030:00
L. HutsonD011203+3025:291:26
K. GuhleD0001020224:390:00
D. SavardD0001130019:480:00
A. XhekajD0000010019:280:00
J. BarronD000101-2216:591:11
J. StrubleD000030-2012:120:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Primeau24213.87560:43Win
S. Montembeault000–0:00

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. JohnsonC0112000018:544:11
D. VoronkovLW0110220018:244:18
A. FantilliC011041+1018:001:54
E. ChinakhovRW101100+1016:431:46
M. OlivierRW101360+1016:370:00
Z. Aston-ReeseLW011441+1015:570:00
S. MonahanC000121-1021:314:08
K. MarchenkoRW0003010019:144:17
J. DanforthRW000132+1017:370:00
J. van RiemsdykLW000110-109:530:59
K. LabancRW000100-108:371:44
S. KuralyC000010-144:020:00
Z. WerenskiD112301+2724:152:32
D. SeversonD0111030021:310:43
I. ProvorovD000001-2024:223:28
D. FabbroD000121+1022:400:00
J. HarrisD000201-1011:530:00
J. ChristiansenD000001+1010:530:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Merzlikins23194.82659:16OT loss
D. Tarasov000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamSean Monahan CBJ Faces MTL, his team until Jan 20241 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreMTL 2.9, CBJ 3.7MTL 4, CBJ 3
Total goals6.67
Shots on goalMTL 26.5, CBJ 34.0MTL 23, CBJ 24
Win chanceCBJ 62%MTL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CBJ Z. Werenski3.631.10218%1
MTL C. Caufield2.950.73132%1
CBJ K. Marchenko2.730.76033%0
CBJ S. Monahan2.510.84028%0
CBJ D. Voronkov2.300.61128%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.300.62123%0
CBJ E. Chinakhov2.310.59124%1
MTL N. Suzuki2.120.88129%1
MTL B. Gallagher2.010.48020%0
CBJ K. Johnson1.820.65122%0
CBJ J. Danforth1.810.50021%0
MTL J. Armia1.700.39117%0
MTL K. Dach1.710.50016%0
CBJ D. Severson1.610.56112%0
MTL J. Slafkovský1.610.56218%1
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.540.31116%0
CBJ D. Fabbro1.510.3406%0
MTL J. Anderson1.520.36018%0
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.510.43017%0
MTL A. Newhook1.520.49020%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.500.4508%0
MTL J. Roy1.400.39015%0
MTL K. Guhle1.410.3709%0
CBJ K. Labanc1.410.40014%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.330.36115%1
MTL C. Dvorak1.230.43016%0
MTL A. Xhekaj1.200.2106%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.200.29014%0
MTL E. Heineman1.110.30115%1
MTL L. Hutson1.120.5015%0
MTL J. Evans1.100.44114%0
MTL J. Barron1.110.2509%0
CBJ J. Christiansen1.000.2303%0
MTL J. Struble1.000.2106%0
MTL D. Savard0.810.3105%0
CBJ J. Harris0.720.2205%0

Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.