Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
MTL4
FinalSun, Oct 27, 2024Every game that night
PHI3

MTL beat PHI 4-3, with the chances close: 2.98 expected goals to 2.58. T. Sanheim led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). N. Suzuki had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.9. C. Primeau stopped 23 of 26.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
MTL1304
PHI1023
  1. 1st 10:42MTLN. Suzuki0.42 xG
  2. 1st 17:24PHIT. Sanheim0.02 xG
  3. 2nd 4:48MTLB. Gallagher0.10 xG
  4. 2nd 12:48MTLC. CaufieldPP0.08 xG
  5. 2nd 16:01MTLJ. Evans0.03 xG
  6. 3rd 17:48PHIT. Sanheim0.14 xG
  7. 3rd 18:17PHIT. Konecny0.26 xG

Team Stats

MTLPHI
24Shots on goal26
2.98Expected goals2.58
50Shot attempts66
195v5 shots on goal19
1/2Power play0/3
18Hits28
22Blocked shots12
6Penalty minutes4
14Giveaways21
9Takeaways9

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

MTL 2.98 xGPHI 2.58 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdMTL goal, 10:42PHI goal, 17:24MTL goal, 4:48MTL goal, 12:48MTL goal, 16:01PHI goal, 17:48PHI goal, 18:17

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

MTL24 on goal, 4 scored
PHI25 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

MTL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. SuzukiC1125030218:571:57
B. GallagherRW1121010014:570:00
J. EvansC1012000017:070:00
C. CaufieldRW1014000016:221:57
K. DachC0111200016:201:57
J. AndersonRW011030-1015:330:00
J. ArmiaRW0000120015:550:00
C. DvorakC0001000014:210:00
A. NewhookC0000000013:471:57
O. KapanenC0002110210:520:00
E. HeinemanLW0002210010:470:00
M. PezzettaLW000131+1010:450:00
M. MathesonD011207+1024:581:57
D. SavardD0110140022:150:00
J. StrubleD011240+1018:550:00
L. MaillouxD011010-1013:310:00
L. HutsonD0001020021:420:00
A. XhekajD000000-1216:560:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Primeau26233.88560:00Win
S. Montembeault000–0:00

PHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. KonecnyRW1013100021:272:29
O. TippettRW0111100019:202:12
J. FarabeeLW011200+1014:391:31
R. PoehlingC011302+1013:460:00
G. HathawayRW011232+107:470:00
N. DeslauriersLW011020005:240:00
M. MichkovRW0002000221:332:38
S. CouturierC0002400020:291:34
S. LaughtonC0001300016:371:32
T. FoersterRW000000-1014:422:02
M. FrostC0000110013:372:40
N. CatesLW000230-1012:410:00
T. SanheimD213301+2024:500:01
J. DrysdaleD000202-1225:032:40
R. RistolainenD000130+1020:060:01
E. AndraeD0001320017:281:50
N. SeelerD000102-2016:480:00
E. JohnsonD0000400011:500:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Kolosov24204.83358:10Loss
S. Ersson000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreMTL 2.9, PHI 3.5MTL 4, PHI 3
Total goals6.47
Shots on goalMTL 24.0, PHI 35.3MTL 24, PHI 26
Win chancePHI 59%MTL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
PHI O. Tippett3.610.71130%0
PHI T. Konecny3.331.00136%1
MTL C. Caufield3.040.77132%1
PHI S. Couturier2.320.51017%0
PHI M. Frost2.100.61019%0
PHI M. Michkov2.120.89027%0
PHI T. Sanheim2.030.52310%2
PHI S. Laughton2.010.54020%0
MTL B. Gallagher2.010.45219%1
PHI T. Foerster2.000.45023%0
MTL N. Suzuki1.950.87227%1
MTL J. Armia1.800.40018%0
PHI J. Farabee1.820.48119%0
MTL M. Matheson1.620.67112%0
MTL K. Dach1.610.52117%0
PHI J. Drysdale1.620.3706%0
MTL J. Anderson1.600.35118%0
PHI N. Seeler1.410.2304%0
PHI R. Poehling1.430.41117%0
PHI G. Hathaway1.420.31115%0
PHI R. Ristolainen1.410.2704%0
MTL A. Newhook1.300.50019%0
PHI N. Cates1.220.37014%0
MTL A. Xhekaj1.200.2407%0
MTL O. Kapanen1.120.28012%0
MTL J. Evans1.120.43112%1
PHI E. Johnson1.000.1705%0
MTL L. Hutson1.010.5706%0
MTL C. Dvorak1.010.39014%0
MTL E. Heineman0.920.26014%0
MTL J. Struble0.820.2115%0
MTL D. Savard0.800.3516%0
PHI N. Deslauriers0.700.0915%0
MTL M. Pezzetta0.610.2008%0

Shots on goal: 19 of 34 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.