PIT beat NJD 4-1, and the chances backed it up: 4.64 expected goals to 3.77. E. Malkin led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). C. Dewar had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.4. A. Silovs stopped 29 of 30.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJD | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| PIT | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
- 1st 18:51PITT. NovakPP0.06 xG
- 2nd 4:56NJDP. Cotter0.19 xG
- 3rd 6:30PITC. Clifton0.02 xG
- 3rd 7:20PITE. Chinakhov0.19 xG
- 3rd 18:01PITB. LizotteEN0.81 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
NJD 3.77 xGPIT 4.64 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
NJD Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Hughes | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 25:42 | 7:49 |
| P. Cotter | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 10:05 | 0:10 |
| C. Brown | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22:02 | 6:08 |
| J. Bratt | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:43 | 5:02 |
| N. Hischier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:00 | 7:02 |
| T. Meier | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:30 | 4:49 |
| D. Mercer | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:14 | 3:46 |
| A. Gritsyuk | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 12:58 | 2:43 |
| L. Hameenaho | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 12:50 | 2:20 |
| C. Glass | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 11:47 | 0:34 |
| N. Bjugstad | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:06 | 0:13 |
| M. Tsyplakov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:33 | 0:10 |
| D. Hamilton | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 22:10 | 5:07 |
| S. Nemec | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20:09 | 4:45 |
| B. Pesce | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:53 | 0:07 |
| B. Dillon | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:59 | 0:10 |
| J. Siegenthaler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17:05 | 0:00 |
| J. Kovacevic | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 13:15 | 0:10 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Markstrom | 36 | 33 | 3 | .917 | 58:34 | Loss |
| J. Allen | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Malkin | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 17:38 | 4:25 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:31 | 0:00 |
| A. Mantha | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 13:54 | 4:01 |
| T. Novak | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:39 | 1:38 |
| E. Chinakhov | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:42 | 1:47 |
| B. Rust | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:47 | 3:40 |
| N. Acciari | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:17 | 0:00 |
| R. Rakell | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:06 | 3:47 |
| C. Dewar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:49 | 0:00 |
| B. Kindel | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:07 | 1:00 |
| J. Brazeau | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:00 | 1:22 |
| A. Hayes | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 11:47 | 0:00 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:19 | 0:00 |
| K. Letang | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 19:02 | 1:48 |
| C. Clifton | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 18:15 | 0:00 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 21:41 | 3:37 |
| S. Girard | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17:53 | 0:00 |
| P. Wotherspoon | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 17:49 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Silovs | 30 | 29 | 1 | .967 | 59:44 | Win |
| S. Skinner | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
NJD
PIT
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | NJD 2.7, PIT 3.5 | NJD 1, PIT 4 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | NJD 26.2, PIT 29.5 | NJD 30, PIT 37 |
| Win chance | PIT 63% | PIT won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJD T. Meier | 3.2 | 4 | 0.62 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| NJD J. Hughes | 3.0 | 2 | 0.86 | 1 | 30% | 0 |
| NJD D. Hamilton | 2.7 | 4 | 0.56 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| PIT B. Rust | 2.6 | 1 | 0.84 | 0 | 33% | 0 |
| NJD N. Hischier | 2.5 | 4 | 0.79 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| PIT R. Rakell | 2.5 | 3 | 0.75 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| PIT E. Malkin | 2.3 | 5 | 0.88 | 2 | 27% | 0 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.2 | 1 | 0.70 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| NJD J. Bratt | 2.2 | 2 | 0.81 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| NJD A. Gritsyuk | 2.1 | 2 | 0.40 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PIT E. Chinakhov | 1.9 | 3 | 0.48 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| PIT K. Letang | 1.9 | 2 | 0.52 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| PIT B. Kindel | 1.9 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| NJD C. Brown | 1.7 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PIT A. Mantha | 1.7 | 1 | 0.64 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| PIT T. Novak | 1.6 | 2 | 0.54 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| NJD D. Mercer | 1.6 | 1 | 0.40 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PIT J. Brazeau | 1.5 | 3 | 0.45 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| NJD N. Bjugstad | 1.5 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| NJD C. Glass | 1.4 | 3 | 0.32 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PIT C. Dewar | 1.4 | 5 | 0.37 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| NJD L. Hameenaho | 1.3 | 3 | 0.36 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| NJD S. Nemec | 1.3 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NJD B. Pesce | 1.2 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PIT N. Acciari | 1.1 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PIT R. Shea | 1.0 | 2 | 0.31 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| PIT P. Wotherspoon | 1.0 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PIT S. Girard | 1.0 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 0.9 | 2 | 0.36 | 1 | 14% | 1 |
| PIT C. Clifton | 0.9 | 2 | 0.22 | 1 | 4% | 1 |
| NJD M. Tsyplakov | 0.8 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| NJD J. Kovacevic | 0.8 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| NJD J. Siegenthaler | 0.8 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NJD P. Cotter | 0.7 | 2 | 0.17 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| NJD B. Dillon | 0.6 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.