Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
NYR5
FinalThu, Jan 16, 2025Every game that night
UTA3

NYR beat UTA 5-3, with the chances close: 3.65 expected goals to 3.00. M. Maccelli led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). M. Maccelli had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.6. I. Shesterkin stopped 28 of 31.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
NYR2035
UTA2103
  1. 1st 1:01UTAM. Maccelli0.15 xG
  2. 1st 3:42NYRA. Panarin0.14 xG
  3. 1st 8:12UTAM. Maccelli0.36 xG
  4. 1st 16:25NYRA. Kaliyev0.23 xG
  5. 2nd 0:57UTAL. CooleyPP0.14 xG
  6. 3rd 0:28NYRR. SmithSH0.03 xG
  7. 3rd 10:22NYRC. Kreider0.07 xG
  8. 3rd 19:22NYRA. PanarinEN0.95 xG

Team Stats

NYRUTA
25Shots on goal31
3.65Expected goals3.00
61Shot attempts62
225v5 shots on goal20
0/3Power play1/3
21Hits18
13Blocked shots18
6Penalty minutes6
12Giveaways10
8Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

NYR 3.65 xGUTA 3.00 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdUTA goal, 1:01NYR goal, 3:42UTA goal, 8:12NYR goal, 16:25UTA goal, 0:57NYR goal, 0:28NYR goal, 10:22NYR goal, 19:22

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

NYR25 on goal, 5 scored
UTA31 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

NYR Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. PanarinLW202410+2018:323:53
S. CarrickC022030+2014:120:00
A. LafrenièreLW0114110218:322:39
C. KreiderLW101210+2016:343:09
R. SmithRW1012210214:490:40
F. ChytilC011300+1012:170:51
A. KaliyevRW101200+1212:070:31
V. TrocheckC000221+3021:322:59
M. ZibanejadC000000-2017:243:49
W. CuylleLW000220-2016:180:22
A. EdstromC000051+1011:050:00
M. RempeC000020005:330:00
A. FoxD011101+1021:373:53
B. SchneiderD011111+2020:000:00
R. LindgrenD011001+1019:590:00
U. VaakanainenD011001+1016:220:00
K. MillerD000004+1020:170:53
W. BorgenD0002110017:150:11
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
I. Shesterkin31283.90360:00Win
J. Quick000–0:00

UTA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. MaccelliLW202501-1014:062:00
B. HaytonC0224000012:341:45
L. CooleyC101210-2020:393:55
C. KellerRW011101-2018:594:00
N. SchmaltzC011501-2018:423:11
K. StenlundC000122-1016:140:06
J. DoanRW0001010014:393:47
N. BjugstadC000171-2014:331:31
A. KerfootC0001100213:200:06
L. CrouseLW000361-1013:051:31
J. McBainC000011-1012:290:00
M. CarconeLW0000000011:510:06
M. SergachevD011202-2222:163:53
I. ColeD0110030020:450:06
O. MaattaD0001020020:490:00
J. MarinoD000101-1019:540:21
M. KesselringD0002010019:021:37
J. VälimäkiD000100-1211:040:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
K. Vejmelka24204.83358:59Loss
C. Ingram000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreNYR 3.2, UTA 3.1NYR 5, UTA 3
Total goals6.28
Shots on goalNYR 29.6, UTA 30.5NYR 25, UTA 31
Win chanceNYR 51%NYR won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
NYR A. Panarin2.841.10232%2
UTA C. Keller2.810.99131%0
NYR V. Trocheck2.620.82028%0
UTA L. Cooley2.520.84127%1
NYR A. Lafrenière2.540.63126%0
NYR C. Kreider2.420.64134%1
NYR M. Zibanejad2.200.75025%0
UTA N. Schmaltz2.250.84125%0
NYR F. Chytil1.830.42118%0
UTA J. Doan1.810.48019%0
NYR R. Smith1.820.53120%1
UTA N. Bjugstad1.710.38017%0
UTA M. Sergachev1.720.66110%0
NYR A. Fox1.710.79111%0
UTA B. Hayton1.740.42216%0
NYR W. Cuylle1.720.39018%0
UTA M. Maccelli1.650.52215%2
UTA M. Carcone1.600.33017%0
UTA L. Crouse1.530.36018%0
UTA M. Kesselring1.420.3306%0
NYR K. Miller1.300.3107%0
NYR A. Kaliyev1.320.22110%1
UTA K. Stenlund1.210.22013%0
NYR B. Schneider1.210.2115%0
NYR S. Carrick1.100.25212%0
UTA A. Kerfoot1.110.39013%0
NYR W. Borgen1.020.2205%0
UTA J. McBain1.000.35014%0
UTA O. Maatta1.010.2604%0
UTA I. Cole0.900.2313%0
UTA J. Välimäki0.910.2303%0
NYR R. Lindgren0.800.2414%0
NYR A. Edstrom0.800.18010%0
UTA J. Marino0.810.2804%0
NYR U. Vaakanainen0.700.1412%0
NYR M. Rempe0.500.1306%0

Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.