Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
OTT1
FinalTue, Nov 5, 2024Every game that night
BUF5

BUF beat OTT 5-1, with the chances close: 3.58 expected goals to 3.51. J. Peterka led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). T. Thompson had 11 shots on goal against our projection of 3.4. U. Luukkonen stopped 37 of 38.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
OTT0101
BUF1135
  1. 1st 6:37BUFJ. PeterkaPP0.07 xG
  2. 2nd 0:17BUFB. Byram0.10 xG
  3. 2nd 7:31OTTR. Greig0.54 xG
  4. 3rd 0:21BUFB. Byram0.04 xG
  5. 3rd 0:37BUFT. Thompson0.66 xG
  6. 3rd 12:08BUFJ. PeterkaPP0.12 xG

Team Stats

OTTBUF
38Shots on goal34
3.51Expected goals3.58
67Shot attempts55
305v5 shots on goal25
0/3Power play2/4
35Hits37
11Blocked shots11
21Penalty minutes21
7Giveaways12
2Takeaways3

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

OTT 3.51 xGBUF 3.58 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdBUF goal, 6:37BUF goal, 0:17OTT goal, 7:31BUF goal, 0:21BUF goal, 0:37BUF goal, 12:08

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

OTT38 on goal, 1 scored
BUF32 on goal, 5 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

OTT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
R. GreigC101321-1017:102:56
T. StützleC011210-1017:092:56
B. TkachukLW011061-11114:481:46
J. NorrisC000310-1017:042:47
A. GaudetteRW0001100216:093:03
C. GirouxRW000210-1016:083:09
D. BathersonRW000230-1215:012:46
M. AmadioRW0002100414:383:09
N. GregorLW0004300014:040:54
Z. MacEwenRW0004500213:190:07
N. CousinsC0003100012:560:08
Z. OstapchukC0001110010:030:00
T. ChabotD0006010025:273:05
J. SandersonD000102-1022:123:06
N. JensenD0001500019:390:00
T. KlevenD000113-1016:530:01
T. HamonicD000231-1016:470:07
J. Bernard-DockerD000001-1013:240:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
L. Ullmark34295.85360:00Loss
A. Forsberg000–0:00

BUF Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. PeterkaRW213600+1215:573:47
T. ThompsonC1121110+1016:213:49
R. McLeodC022030+2014:430:00
J. ZuckerLW011110+1016:103:37
J. GreenwayLW011140+2515:280:00
A. TuchRW011310+1015:201:20
D. CozensC0002520015:453:49
B. MalenstynLW000151-1014:350:00
S. LaffertyC0001200214:160:00
J. QuinnRW0001010013:441:22
P. KrebsC000130-1012:300:00
Z. BensonLW0000200610:141:32
R. DahlinD022421+1022:333:47
B. ByramD202210+1022:311:20
O. PowerD000011+1022:391:22
J. BrysonD000012+1218:520:00
C. CliftonD0000230017:560:00
D. GilbertD0000300412:260:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
U. Luukkonen38371.97460:00Win
D. Levi000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamDylan Cozens OTT Faces BUF, his team until Mar 20252 SOG
  • Old teamJosh Norris BUF Faces OTT, his team until Mar 20253 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreOTT 3.2, BUF 3.3OTT 1, BUF 5
Total goals6.56
Shots on goalOTT 30.2, BUF 30.0OTT 38, BUF 34
Win chanceBUF 53%BUF won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
OTT B. Tkachuk3.800.90132%0
BUF T. Thompson3.4111.02241%1
BUF J. Peterka2.960.72329%2
BUF A. Tuch2.830.96132%0
BUF D. Cozens2.620.66024%0
BUF R. Dahlin2.440.80218%0
OTT D. Batherson2.320.80026%0
BUF J. Zucker2.310.59124%0
OTT T. Stützle2.220.92127%0
OTT J. Norris2.130.68031%0
OTT C. Giroux2.120.82027%0
OTT T. Chabot2.060.52012%0
OTT J. Sanderson1.810.4709%0
OTT N. Gregor1.840.27013%0
BUF J. Quinn1.810.54020%0
OTT M. Amadio1.620.43021%0
BUF J. Greenway1.610.39116%0
OTT A. Gaudette1.410.29014%0
OTT T. Hamonic1.420.1906%0
BUF O. Power1.300.4808%0
BUF Z. Benson1.300.39015%0
OTT R. Greig1.330.35116%1
BUF R. McLeod1.300.40218%0
OTT N. Cousins1.230.2409%0
BUF B. Byram1.220.54214%2
OTT T. Kleven1.110.1603%0
OTT N. Jensen1.110.2705%0
BUF C. Clifton0.900.2605%0
BUF P. Krebs0.910.28010%0
OTT Z. MacEwen0.940.1407%0
OTT Z. Ostapchuk0.810.20010%0
BUF B. Malenstyn0.810.1707%0
OTT J. Bernard-Docker0.700.1604%0
BUF S. Lafferty0.710.20010%0
BUF J. Bryson0.400.1803%0
BUF D. Gilbert0.400.1503%0

Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.4 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.