Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PHI1
FinalSat, Dec 14, 2024Every game that night
MIN4

MIN beat PHI 4-1, with the chances close: 2.23 expected goals to 1.75. K. Kaprizov led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). R. Ristolainen had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. M. Fleury stopped 21 of 22.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
PHI0011
MIN1124
  1. 1st 14:18MINK. Kaprizov0.05 xG
  2. 2nd 15:21MINM. Boldy0.19 xG
  3. 3rd 9:34MINM. Rossi0.10 xG
  4. 3rd 14:18PHIT. Sanheim0.02 xG
  5. 3rd 17:50MINK. KaprizovEN0.78 xG

Team Stats

PHIMIN
22Shots on goal22
1.75Expected goals2.23
52Shot attempts40
175v5 shots on goal17
0/3Power play0/1
17Hits18
11Blocked shots16
9Penalty minutes13
14Giveaways15
6Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PHI 1.75 xGMIN 2.23 xGGoal

00.511.522.51st2nd3rdMIN goal, 14:18MIN goal, 15:21MIN goal, 9:34PHI goal, 14:18MIN goal, 17:50

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PHI22 on goal, 1 scored
MIN21 on goal, 4 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
R. PoehlingC011100+1011:380:00
G. HathawayRW011091+1711:120:06
T. KonecnyRW000101-2022:213:47
M. MichkovRW000400-2018:093:39
S. CouturierC000001-1018:083:41
J. FarabeeLW0002000016:511:16
O. TippettRW000220-1015:391:10
T. FoersterRW000001-2015:091:15
M. FrostC000000-1015:011:11
B. BrinkRW000020-3014:083:37
S. LaughtonC000100+1014:000:00
N. CatesLW000300-1012:520:08
T. SanheimD1011130224:070:00
J. DrysdaleD000100-1022:033:38
C. YorkD000211-2020:220:00
E. ZamulaD000002-1018:131:27
R. RistolainenD000410-1017:210:15
N. SeelerD0000110011:000:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
S. Ersson21183.85757:46Loss
A. Kolosov000–0:00

MIN Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. KaprizovLW202300+3018:401:02
M. BoldyLW101102+1217:451:02
M. FolignoLW011340+1716:510:00
M. RossiC1012200015:031:02
M. ZuccarelloRW0110110014:201:02
M. JohanssonLW0001110018:530:00
F. GaudreauC000110+1016:330:00
R. HartmanRW000102+1016:010:00
B. JonesC000120+1015:210:00
M. KhusnutdinovC0000010011:250:00
R. JohnsonC000020008:080:00
J. LaukoC000020003:230:00
B. FaberD011113+2027:020:00
J. BrodinD011300+2025:060:00
D. ChisholmD011324+1018:590:00
Z. BogosianD0111000014:230:00
J. MerrillD0111000213:370:00
J. SpurgeonD000002+1220:301:02
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
M. Fleury22211.95560:00Win
F. Gustavsson000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamBobby Brink MIN Faces PHI, his team until Mar 20260 SOG
  • HometownNoah Cates PHI Plays near home (born in Stillwater)3 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePHI 2.8, MIN 3.3PHI 1, MIN 4
Total goals6.15
Shots on goalPHI 29.2, MIN 28.7PHI 22, MIN 22
Win chanceMIN 59%MIN won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
MIN K. Kaprizov3.531.46248%2
MIN M. Boldy3.110.97133%1
PHI T. Konecny2.810.90032%0
PHI O. Tippett2.520.49022%0
PHI S. Couturier2.200.48016%0
PHI J. Farabee2.120.48019%0
MIN R. Hartman2.110.58024%0
MIN M. Rossi1.920.68126%1
PHI T. Sanheim1.810.4619%1
PHI M. Michkov1.740.73022%0
MIN J. Spurgeon1.700.53012%0
MIN M. Zuccarello1.700.74119%0
MIN M. Johansson1.610.52019%0
PHI T. Foerster1.600.35018%0
PHI M. Frost1.600.44015%0
MIN J. Brodin1.530.4018%0
PHI S. Laughton1.510.37014%0
MIN B. Faber1.510.63110%0
PHI C. York1.420.3408%0
MIN F. Gaudreau1.410.43017%0
PHI B. Brink1.300.36013%0
PHI J. Drysdale1.310.2805%0
PHI G. Hathaway1.300.26112%0
PHI R. Ristolainen1.340.2403%0
PHI N. Seeler1.200.2203%0
MIN D. Chisholm1.130.3418%0
MIN M. Foligno1.130.44118%0
PHI N. Cates1.130.31011%0
PHI R. Poehling1.110.29112%0
MIN Z. Bogosian1.010.2015%0
MIN R. Johnson0.900.1307%0
MIN B. Jones0.910.1208%0
MIN J. Lauko0.800.23010%0
MIN J. Merrill0.810.2115%0
PHI E. Zamula0.800.2604%0
MIN M. Khusnutdinov0.500.2009%0

Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.