PHI beat NJD 5-3, and the chances backed it up: 3.44 expected goals to 2.63. O. Tippett led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). M. Michkov had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.0. D. Vladar stopped 29 of 32.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| NJD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
- 1st 5:18PHIO. Tippett0.17 xG
- 1st 12:09NJDS. Nemec0.10 xG
- 2nd 0:53PHIM. Michkov0.25 xG
- 2nd 3:16PHIM. Michkov0.16 xG
- 2nd 13:03PHIT. Zegras0.20 xG
- 2nd 19:33NJDT. MeierPP0.03 xG
- 3rd 6:28NJDD. Mercer0.08 xG
- 3rd 19:11PHIO. TippettEN0.49 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 3.44 xGNJD 2.63 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O. Tippett | RW | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 15:34 | 1:05 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 17:27 | 2:41 |
| T. Zegras | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:06 | 2:41 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 12:57 | 0:58 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 19:00 | 0:02 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 17:29 | 0:00 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:57 | 2:39 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:15 | 2:28 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 13:12 | 0:52 |
| R. Abols | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:45 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10:08 | 0:00 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:25 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 24:52 | 1:16 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 23:10 | 2:16 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 19:50 | 0:02 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | +1 | 0 | 19:12 | 0:02 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:29 | 0:53 |
| E. Zamula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:22 | 0:00 |
NJD Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Bratt | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 20:52 | 6:16 |
| D. Mercer | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:49 | 4:24 |
| N. Hischier | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 23:52 | 5:52 |
| T. Meier | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 22:11 | 5:45 |
| C. Brown | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:18 | 0:08 |
| A. Gritsyuk | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:36 | 1:22 |
| O. Palat | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:20 | 1:24 |
| P. Cotter | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 12:06 | 0:20 |
| C. Glass | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:04 | 0:12 |
| L. Glendening | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:20 | 0:00 |
| S. Noesen | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:14 | 1:15 |
| J. Lammikko | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:07 | 0:00 |
| S. Nemec | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 2 | 20:16 | 2:55 |
| D. Hamilton | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 25:35 | 4:23 |
| L. Hughes | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 22:01 | 3:09 |
| J. Siegenthaler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 20:37 | 0:00 |
| B. Dillon | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 14:24 | 0:00 |
| C. White | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:31 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Markstrom | 31 | 27 | 4 | .871 | 59:47 | Loss |
| J. Allen | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
NJD
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.7, NJD 3.2 | PHI 5, NJD 3 |
| Total goals | 5.9 | 8 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 25.2, NJD 27.0 | PHI 31, NJD 32 |
| Win chance | NJD 59% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJD T. Meier | 3.0 | 5 | 0.83 | 1 | 34% | 1 |
| NJD D. Hamilton | 2.5 | 3 | 0.64 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.3 | 4 | 0.53 | 3 | 23% | 2 |
| NJD J. Bratt | 2.3 | 2 | 1.02 | 2 | 27% | 0 |
| NJD N. Hischier | 2.3 | 2 | 0.94 | 1 | 33% | 0 |
| NJD A. Gritsyuk | 2.2 | 2 | 0.47 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.0 | 2 | 0.70 | 2 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.0 | 2 | 0.64 | 2 | 22% | 1 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.0 | 6 | 0.56 | 2 | 21% | 2 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 1.8 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| NJD L. Hughes | 1.8 | 4 | 0.65 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NJD D. Mercer | 1.8 | 5 | 0.60 | 2 | 27% | 1 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.7 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.6 | 0 | 0.38 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.6 | 1 | 0.47 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| NJD C. Brown | 1.5 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| NJD S. Nemec | 1.4 | 3 | 0.45 | 1 | 12% | 1 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.4 | 3 | 0.44 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.3 | 3 | 0.42 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| NJD C. Glass | 1.3 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| NJD S. Noesen | 1.2 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 1.2 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.2 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.1 | 1 | 0.36 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| NJD P. Cotter | 1.1 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.1 | 2 | 0.19 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI R. Abols | 1.1 | 1 | 0.16 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NJD O. Palat | 1.1 | 2 | 0.35 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| NJD J. Siegenthaler | 0.9 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.8 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NJD B. Dillon | 0.7 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| NJD J. Lammikko | 0.7 | 2 | 0.16 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NJD L. Glendening | 0.7 | 1 | 0.14 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI E. Zamula | 0.6 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| NJD C. White | 0.6 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.5 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.