Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PHI5
FinalTue, Apr 7, 2026Every game that night
NJD1

PHI beat NJD 5-1 despite fewer good chances: 1.73 expected goals to 2.64. T. Zegras led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). D. Vladar stopped 23 of 24.

Team Stats

PHINJD
20Shots on goal24
1.73Expected goals2.64
26Shot attempts64
145v5 shots on goal17
1/2Power play0/3
15Hits17
15Blocked shots3
4Penalty minutes4
20Giveaways18
1Takeaways7

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PHI 1.73 xGNJD 2.64 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdPHI goal, 1:56PHI goal, 3:38NJD goal, 12:12PHI goal, 2:46PHI goal, 4:58

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PHI19 on goal, 4 scored
NJD24 on goal, 1 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. ZegrasC213201+2013:501:30
T. FoersterRW202401+3015:191:25
M. MichkovRW022000+1013:461:47
P. MartoneRW011212+1015:441:14
O. TippettRW011110+2014:571:52
C. DvorakC000311+1017:521:56
S. CouturierC0001100017:250:00
T. KonecnyRW000000+1016:141:54
L. GlendeningC0001100013:460:00
N. CatesLW000300-1213:251:19
D. BarkeyC0000100213:000:00
A. BumpLW000131-1011:310:00
T. SanheimD011003+1024:450:11
J. DrysdaleD011103+1017:491:17
N. SeelerD101102+1016:000:00
R. RistolainenD000020+2023:341:49
C. YorkD000031+2021:450:11
E. AndraeD000010-1013:230:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Vladar24231.95860:00Win
S. Ersson000–0:00

NJD Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. GlassC1011010014:271:28
L. HameenahoRW011110-1010:000:37
J. HughesC000500-2222:443:51
C. BrownRW000200-2020:053:53
J. BrattLW000240-1019:073:14
T. MeierRW000300-2018:162:47
N. HischierC0003000017:563:16
D. MercerC000100-2017:452:38
N. BjugstadC000000+1011:550:00
P. CotterLW000050-1011:550:02
B. HalonenLW0000200210:160:02
M. McLaughlinC000010009:300:02
J. SiegenthalerD0110010017:150:02
L. HughesD000210-1024:093:40
J. KovacevicD000000-1020:170:00
D. HamiltonD000200-2018:502:21
B. DillonD0001300017:320:00
S. NemecD000101-2016:402:07
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Markstrom19154.78958:04Loss
J. Allen000–0:00

Lines at 5-on-5

PHI

Line 1T. Konecny14:05P. Martone14:17C. Dvorak14:01
Line 3T. Zegras12:20T. Foerster11:19O. Tippett11:07
Line 4M. Michkov11:15A. Bump10:47N. Cates10:08
Pair 1R. Ristolainen17:14T. Sanheim18:54
Pair 2C. York18:40J. Drysdale16:25
Pair 3N. Seeler13:02E. Andrae13:21

NJD

Line 1J. Bratt13:24J. Hughes16:20C. Brown13:17
Line 2T. Meier13:41D. Mercer13:31N. Hischier11:23
Pair 1J. Kovacevic18:02L. Hughes18:25
Pair 3B. Dillon15:35S. Nemec14:25

From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePHI 2.8, NJD 3.2PHI 5, NJD 1
Total goals6.06
Shots on goalPHI 24.6, NJD 27.7PHI 20, NJD 24
Win chanceNJD 57%PHI won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
NJD J. Hughes3.651.30039%0
NJD T. Meier3.130.69032%0
PHI O. Tippett2.710.60127%0
NJD N. Hischier2.430.91033%0
NJD D. Hamilton2.320.53014%0
PHI T. Konecny2.100.78027%0
NJD J. Bratt2.020.95026%0
NJD L. Hughes2.020.59010%0
NJD D. Mercer1.810.53025%0
PHI M. Michkov1.800.56220%0
NJD C. Brown1.820.66022%0
PHI T. Zegras1.820.65322%2
PHI C. Dvorak1.730.58019%0
PHI T. Foerster1.740.48224%2
PHI R. Ristolainen1.600.3606%0
PHI S. Couturier1.410.37013%0
PHI N. Cates1.430.48017%0
PHI T. Sanheim1.300.41110%0
NJD C. Glass1.210.33115%1
NJD S. Nemec1.210.33010%0
PHI J. Drysdale1.210.3518%0
NJD L. Hameenaho1.210.27111%0
PHI A. Bump1.210.41015%0
PHI C. York1.100.2806%0
NJD N. Bjugstad1.100.22012%0
PHI D. Barkey1.000.34013%0
PHI N. Seeler0.910.1413%1
NJD J. Kovacevic0.900.2204%0
PHI L. Glendening0.810.1407%0
NJD J. Siegenthaler0.800.1913%0
NJD M. McLaughlin0.700.20012%0
NJD B. Dillon0.610.1904%0
PHI E. Andrae0.500.1302%0
NJD P. Cotter0.500.1609%0
NJD B. Halonen0.500.1107%0

Shots on goal: 23 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.