PIT beat PHI 3-2, and the chances backed it up: 3.36 expected goals to 2.09. R. Ristolainen led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). A. Bump had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.3. A. Silovs stopped 18 of 20.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| PIT | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
- 1st 2:45PITE. Soderblom0.07 xG
- 2nd 3:17PITC. Dewar0.12 xG
- 2nd 3:29PHIA. Bump0.08 xG
- 2nd 15:06PHIT. Sanheim0.01 xG
- 2nd 17:12PITK. Letang0.01 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 2.09 xGPIT 3.36 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 4 | 19:32 | 2:27 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:19 | 1:28 |
| A. Bump | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:29 | 0:00 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:29 | 2:36 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 18:43 | 2:32 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 18:01 | 1:19 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:11 | 1:32 |
| P. Martone | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:32 | 2:33 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:09 | 1:10 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:15 | 0:00 |
| L. Glendening | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:42 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8:17 | 0:00 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 23:21 | 2:06 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 23:30 | 0:22 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 22:53 | 0:12 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 22:22 | 1:43 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:13 | 0:00 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 11:00 | 0:00 |
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Crosby | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:13 | 3:11 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:49 | 0:00 |
| A. Mantha | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 12:28 | 0:34 |
| C. Dewar | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:14 | 0:00 |
| E. Soderblom | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 10:50 | 0:21 |
| R. Rakell | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:59 | 3:12 |
| B. Rust | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:37 | 3:14 |
| N. Acciari | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 15:45 | 0:00 |
| E. Malkin | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14:25 | 1:26 |
| T. Novak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:04 | 2:13 |
| E. Chinakhov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:00 | 0:48 |
| B. Kindel | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 11:49 | 0:49 |
| K. Letang | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 24:40 | 0:42 |
| P. Wotherspoon | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 21:03 | 0:00 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 17:03 | 0:00 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 26:23 | 3:18 |
| S. Girard | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 21:41 | 0:12 |
| I. Solovyov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6:09 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Silovs | 20 | 18 | 2 | .900 | 59:48 | Win |
| S. Skinner | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
PIT
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.9, PIT 3.2 | PHI 2, PIT 3 |
| Total goals | 6.1 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 24.6, PIT 25.7 | PHI 20, PIT 21 |
| Win chance | PIT 55% | PIT won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI P. Martone | 2.7 | 1 | 0.71 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| PIT R. Rakell | 2.5 | 5 | 0.82 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.4 | 1 | 0.62 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| PIT S. Crosby | 2.4 | 0 | 1.08 | 2 | 34% | 0 |
| PIT B. Rust | 2.4 | 2 | 0.86 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| PIT E. Malkin | 2.2 | 0 | 0.92 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.2 | 2 | 0.78 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PIT E. Chinakhov | 1.9 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 1.9 | 1 | 0.55 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 1.9 | 0 | 0.77 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 1.7 | 0 | 0.68 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.7 | 1 | 0.59 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.6 | 1 | 0.41 | 2 | 7% | 0 |
| PIT A. Mantha | 1.5 | 1 | 0.59 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| PIT B. Kindel | 1.5 | 2 | 0.39 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.5 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PIT T. Novak | 1.5 | 1 | 0.52 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.5 | 0 | 0.53 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| PIT K. Letang | 1.4 | 1 | 0.44 | 1 | 9% | 1 |
| PHI A. Bump | 1.3 | 4 | 0.47 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.3 | 1 | 0.44 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.3 | 2 | 0.36 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PIT N. Acciari | 1.2 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PIT C. Dewar | 1.2 | 2 | 0.34 | 1 | 14% | 1 |
| PIT E. Soderblom | 1.1 | 2 | 0.27 | 1 | 13% | 1 |
| PHI C. York | 1.1 | 2 | 0.29 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.0 | 2 | 0.16 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI L. Glendening | 0.9 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 0.9 | 1 | 0.35 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 0.8 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT P. Wotherspoon | 0.8 | 1 | 0.30 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| PIT S. Girard | 0.8 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.8 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PIT R. Shea | 0.7 | 0 | 0.31 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| PIT I. Solovyov | 0.7 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 0.6 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.