PIT beat DET 4-1, and the chances backed it up: 3.56 expected goals to 1.48. PIT outshot DET 31 to 12. S. Crosby led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). R. Rakell had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.4. S. Skinner stopped 11 of 12.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| DET | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
- 1st 3:44PITB. Rust0.09 xG
- 1st 17:30PITE. Chinakhov0.17 xG
- 2nd 15:06DETA. DeBrincat0.05 xG
- 3rd 19:00PITR. RakellEN0.84 xG
- 3rd 19:28PITC. DewarEN0.48 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PIT 3.56 xGDET 1.48 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Crosby | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 18:17 | 2:35 |
| R. Rakell | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 19:02 | 2:35 |
| B. Rust | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 18:56 | 2:34 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:12 | 0:00 |
| C. Dewar | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:40 | 0:00 |
| B. Kindel | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:36 | 0:25 |
| E. Chinakhov | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:26 | 0:27 |
| N. Acciari | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:02 | 0:00 |
| A. Mantha | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:43 | 1:20 |
| T. Novak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13:07 | 0:27 |
| J. Brazeau | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:00 | 1:33 |
| R. McGroarty | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:25 | 0:00 |
| P. Wotherspoon | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 18:49 | 0:00 |
| K. Letang | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 22:26 | 0:27 |
| B. Kulak | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | +1 | 2 | 20:13 | 0:11 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 20:59 | 2:35 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18:29 | 0:01 |
| J. St. Ivany | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:38 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Skinner | 12 | 11 | 1 | .917 | 60:00 | Win |
| A. Silovs | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
DET Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. DeBrincat | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:45 | 1:46 |
| D. Larkin | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:49 | 1:46 |
| L. Raymond | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 17:34 | 1:58 |
| A. Copp | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 16:52 | 1:06 |
| P. Kane | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 16:45 | 1:46 |
| E. Finnie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 15:05 | 1:04 |
| M. Appleton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:54 | 0:10 |
| J. Compher | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:01 | 0:12 |
| M. Rasmussen | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 13:32 | 0:07 |
| M. Kasper | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:06 | 0:00 |
| N. Danielson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:52 | 0:57 |
| J. van Riemsdyk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:22 | 1:04 |
| M. Seider | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | -2 | 2 | 26:59 | 2:02 |
| B. Chiarot | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21:35 | 0:00 |
| S. Edvinsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 21:24 | 0:12 |
| A. Sandin-Pellikka | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:03 | 1:00 |
| A. Johansson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 15:18 | 0:00 |
| J. Bernard-Docker | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:48 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PIT
DET
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PIT 3.1, DET 3.3 | PIT 4, DET 1 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | PIT 27.4, DET 29.0 | PIT 31, DET 12 |
| Win chance | DET 53% | PIT won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET A. DeBrincat | 3.1 | 4 | 0.89 | 1 | 33% | 1 |
| DET D. Larkin | 3.0 | 1 | 1.03 | 0 | 37% | 0 |
| DET P. Kane | 2.5 | 1 | 0.82 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PIT B. Rust | 2.5 | 5 | 0.83 | 1 | 31% | 1 |
| PIT S. Crosby | 2.5 | 1 | 1.02 | 2 | 34% | 0 |
| PIT R. Rakell | 2.4 | 6 | 0.73 | 1 | 27% | 1 |
| DET L. Raymond | 2.4 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| DET M. Seider | 2.1 | 0 | 0.62 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.1 | 0 | 0.68 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| DET E. Finnie | 2.0 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PIT B. Kindel | 1.8 | 0 | 0.34 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| PIT K. Letang | 1.7 | 1 | 0.45 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| PIT A. Mantha | 1.6 | 3 | 0.60 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| DET A. Copp | 1.6 | 1 | 0.54 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| PIT T. Novak | 1.5 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| DET J. Riemsdyk | 1.5 | 1 | 0.46 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PIT C. Dewar | 1.4 | 3 | 0.29 | 1 | 13% | 1 |
| PIT R. McGroarty | 1.4 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PIT J. Brazeau | 1.4 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| DET S. Edvinsson | 1.4 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| DET M. Rasmussen | 1.4 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PIT E. Chinakhov | 1.3 | 3 | 0.30 | 1 | 14% | 1 |
| DET M. Kasper | 1.3 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| DET M. Appleton | 1.3 | 2 | 0.34 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| DET B. Chiarot | 1.2 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| DET J. Compher | 1.2 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PIT B. Kulak | 1.2 | 2 | 0.22 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| DET N. Danielson | 1.1 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 1.1 | 0 | 0.33 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| PIT N. Acciari | 1.1 | 2 | 0.22 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT P. Wotherspoon | 0.9 | 1 | 0.24 | 2 | 3% | 0 |
| PIT J. Ivany | 0.9 | 2 | 0.14 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| DET A. Sandin-Pellikka | 0.9 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| DET J. Bernard-Docker | 0.8 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| DET A. Johansson | 0.7 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PIT R. Shea | 0.7 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 15 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.4 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.