Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PIT4
Final/OTThu, Apr 3, 2025Every game that night
STL5

STL beat PIT 5-4 in overtime despite fewer good chances: 2.70 expected goals to 3.35. PIT outshot STL 28 to 19. J. Neighbours led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). R. Rakell had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 2.3. J. Hofer stopped 24 of 28.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdOTT
PIT11204
STL03115
  1. 1st 3:32PITB. Rust0.17 xG
  2. 2nd 0:39STLJ. Neighbours0.23 xG
  3. 2nd 4:22PITC. Dewar0.74 xG
  4. 2nd 6:48STLP. Buchnevich0.16 xG
  5. 2nd 8:05STLJ. Kyrou0.20 xG
  6. 3rd 5:56STLJ. Neighbours0.28 xG
  7. 3rd 11:15PITR. RakellPP0.19 xG
  8. 3rd 19:35PITR. McGroarty0.16 xG
  9. OT 2:12STLR. ThomasPP0.18 xG

Team Stats

PITSTL
28Shots on goal19
3.35Expected goals2.70
55Shot attempts41
235v5 shots on goal15
1/1Power play1/5
20Hits22
11Blocked shots13
10Penalty minutes2
11Giveaways19
5Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PIT 3.35 xGSTL 2.70 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdOTPIT goal, 3:32STL goal, 0:39PIT goal, 4:22STL goal, 6:48STL goal, 8:05STL goal, 5:56PIT goal, 11:15PIT goal, 19:35STL goal, 2:12

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PIT28 on goal, 4 scored
STL19 on goal, 5 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PIT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. RustRW112301+2019:460:30
R. McGroartyRW112321+1018:280:00
R. RakellRW112530+1017:260:30
S. CrosbyC011200+1021:080:30
C. DewarC1012340018:550:00
V. KoivunenRW0111000217:470:30
B. LizotteC0001000015:090:00
N. AcciariC000131-2015:000:00
J. KoppanenLW0000200011:240:00
D. HeinenLW000010009:350:00
P. TomasinoRW000100-208:150:00
K. HayesRW000000-207:440:00
E. KarlssonD011402+1224:290:00
M. GrzelcykD011200-2021:210:30
K. LetangD000330-2224:390:00
C. TimminsD000011+1021:230:00
R. GravesD000010-1013:590:00
R. SheaD0000110413:550:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
T. Jarry19145.73760:25OT loss
A. Nedeljkovic000–0:00

STL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
R. ThomasC112202-2022:355:55
J. KyrouRW112300+1020:105:15
J. NeighboursLW2023110018:012:32
P. BuchnevichLW1011000022:305:44
J. SnuggerudRW0112000016:222:29
O. SundqvistC011000+1014:211:16
N. WalkerLW011050+1012:260:00
B. SchennC000230+1019:224:23
Z. BolducRW0000100015:322:40
R. FaksaC000010+1012:440:00
A. ToropchenkoRW0001420011:570:00
D. HollowayLW000000005:220:58
C. FowlerD011100+1020:362:55
P. BrobergD011101+1019:070:22
J. FaulkD000221-2225:095:10
N. LeddyD0000030018:210:07
R. SuterD000113+1016:230:00
T. TuckerD000040+1015:520:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Hofer28244.85762:12Win
J. Binnington000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePIT 2.7, STL 3.5PIT 4, STL 5
Total goals6.29
Shots on goalPIT 25.7, STL 30.0PIT 28, STL 19
Win chanceSTL 63%STL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
STL J. Kyrou2.830.88233%1
PIT S. Crosby2.721.01132%0
PIT B. Rust2.730.78230%1
STL D. Holloway2.500.88028%0
PIT R. Rakell2.350.71228%1
PIT E. Karlsson2.140.62114%0
STL P. Buchnevich2.110.86128%1
STL R. Thomas2.021.14227%1
PIT K. Letang2.030.46011%0
STL Z. Bolduc2.000.59024%0
STL B. Schenn1.920.76024%0
STL J. Faulk1.820.61010%0
STL P. Broberg1.610.47111%0
PIT P. Tomasino1.610.39015%0
PIT K. Hayes1.500.32013%0
STL J. Neighbours1.530.56223%2
STL C. Fowler1.310.58110%0
STL A. Toropchenko1.310.29012%0
PIT C. Dewar1.320.25111%1
STL N. Walker1.100.31114%0
PIT B. Lizotte1.110.35015%0
PIT C. Timmins1.100.2906%0
PIT M. Grzelcyk1.120.3614%0
STL R. Faksa1.000.27010%0
STL O. Sundqvist1.000.37113%0
PIT N. Acciari1.010.18011%0
STL T. Tucker1.000.1906%0
PIT D. Heinen1.000.29013%0
PIT J. Koppanen0.900.22012%0
STL N. Leddy0.900.2904%0
STL R. Suter0.810.2203%0
PIT R. Graves0.700.1404%0
PIT R. Shea0.600.1305%0

Shots on goal: 21 of 33 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.