WPG beat PIT 5-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.69 expected goals to 2.62. K. Connor led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). K. Connor had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 3.4. E. Comrie stopped 28 of 30.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| WPG | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
- 1st 0:15WPGG. Vilardi0.08 xG
- 1st 2:43WPGB. Lambert0.23 xG
- 2nd 1:17WPGV. Namestnikov0.11 xG
- 2nd 12:13WPGK. Connor0.29 xG
- 2nd 19:48PITS. CrosbyPP0.09 xG
- 3rd 10:27PITB. Lizotte0.23 xG
- 3rd 18:39WPGK. ConnorEN0.62 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PIT 2.62 xGWPG 4.69 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Crosby | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 18:40 | 1:26 |
| E. Malkin | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 17:43 | 1:50 |
| C. Dewar | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 13:32 | 0:17 |
| N. Acciari | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:41 | 0:00 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 12:30 | 0:00 |
| B. Rust | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 20:13 | 1:28 |
| P. Tomasino | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:25 | 0:17 |
| A. Mantha | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:50 | 0:35 |
| B. Kindel | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 14:09 | 1:25 |
| F. Hallander | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:13 | 0:40 |
| V. Koivunen | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:18 | 0:42 |
| T. Novak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:32 | 0:43 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 27:00 | 1:40 |
| K. Letang | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 21:55 | 1:02 |
| P. Wotherspoon | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 21:48 | 0:00 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20:57 | 0:00 |
| H. Brunicke | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 15:38 | 0:00 |
| O. Pickering | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 10:43 | 0:00 |
WPG Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Connor | LW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 18:37 | 3:04 |
| M. Scheifele | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:47 | 3:08 |
| G. Vilardi | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:42 | 3:05 |
| V. Namestnikov | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:37 | 2:45 |
| A. Iafallo | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:28 | 3:05 |
| J. Toews | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:56 | 2:52 |
| P. Ford | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 13:07 | 0:00 |
| C. Koepke | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:32 | 0:00 |
| B. Lambert | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:11 | 0:00 |
| T. Pearson | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:13 | 2:53 |
| N. Niederreiter | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:40 | 2:53 |
| M. Barron | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:10 | 0:00 |
| J. Morrissey | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:35 | 3:04 |
| N. Pionk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | +2 | 2 | 21:20 | 2:57 |
| D. DeMelo | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 20:30 | 0:11 |
| L. Stanley | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 19:54 | 0:03 |
| H. Fleury | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 15:42 | 0:00 |
| C. Miller | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:34 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Comrie | 30 | 28 | 2 | .933 | 60:00 | Win |
| C. Hellebuyck | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PIT
WPG
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PIT 2.6, WPG 3.4 | PIT 2, WPG 5 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | PIT 25.6, WPG 29.5 | PIT 30, WPG 34 |
| Win chance | WPG 63% | WPG won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG K. Connor | 3.4 | 8 | 1.20 | 2 | 39% | 2 |
| PIT B. Rust | 2.5 | 1 | 0.71 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| PIT S. Crosby | 2.4 | 3 | 0.86 | 1 | 29% | 1 |
| WPG M. Scheifele | 2.3 | 1 | 1.09 | 2 | 36% | 0 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.2 | 3 | 0.67 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| WPG G. Vilardi | 2.2 | 3 | 0.85 | 2 | 32% | 1 |
| WPG J. Morrissey | 2.2 | 2 | 0.81 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| WPG N. Pionk | 2.1 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PIT E. Malkin | 1.8 | 4 | 0.66 | 1 | 21% | 0 |
| WPG N. Niederreiter | 1.8 | 1 | 0.45 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PIT K. Letang | 1.7 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| WPG A. Iafallo | 1.7 | 3 | 0.45 | 1 | 18% | 0 |
| PIT A. Mantha | 1.5 | 1 | 0.49 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| WPG J. Toews | 1.5 | 1 | 0.51 | 1 | 18% | 0 |
| WPG M. Barron | 1.5 | 2 | 0.32 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PIT B. Kindel | 1.4 | 2 | 0.25 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PIT F. Hallander | 1.4 | 4 | 0.29 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT C. Dewar | 1.3 | 1 | 0.23 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| WPG V. Namestnikov | 1.3 | 4 | 0.50 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| PIT P. Tomasino | 1.3 | 2 | 0.28 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT T. Novak | 1.3 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| WPG T. Pearson | 1.3 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| WPG D. DeMelo | 1.2 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PIT V. Koivunen | 1.2 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| WPG C. Miller | 1.1 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| WPG C. Koepke | 1.1 | 3 | 0.22 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT H. Brunicke | 1.0 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| WPG H. Fleury | 1.0 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 1.0 | 3 | 0.27 | 1 | 13% | 1 |
| WPG L. Stanley | 1.0 | 3 | 0.28 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PIT P. Wotherspoon | 1.0 | 3 | 0.21 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PIT N. Acciari | 1.0 | 0 | 0.16 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| WPG P. Ford | 0.9 | 1 | 0.22 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| WPG B. Lambert | 0.8 | 1 | 0.29 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| PIT R. Shea | 0.8 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PIT O. Pickering | 0.6 | 1 | 0.11 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.