TBL beat VAN 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.66 expected goals to 2.73. TBL outshot VAN 33 to 25. B. Point led the way with 4 points (2 G, 2 A). J. DeBrusk had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 2.4. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 23 of 25.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| VAN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
- 1st 16:08VANQ. Hughes0.04 xG
- 2nd 4:40TBLN. Kucherov0.07 xG
- 2nd 6:29TBLB. PointPP0.06 xG
- 3rd 4:52VANK. Sherwood0.18 xG
- 3rd 16:04TBLJ. GuentzelPP0.25 xG
- 3rd 19:42TBLB. PointEN0.87 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
TBL 4.66 xGVAN 2.73 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
TBL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Point | C | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:07 | 7:06 |
| N. Kucherov | RW | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 22:43 | 7:16 |
| J. Guentzel | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 23:15 | 7:13 |
| B. Hagel | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 4 | 23:39 | 7:11 |
| N. Paul | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:59 | 0:03 |
| Z. Girgensons | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 13:01 | 0:00 |
| L. Glendening | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:58 | 0:00 |
| M. Chaffee | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:40 | 0:00 |
| M. Eyssimont | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:29 | 0:00 |
| G. Goncalves | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:44 | 0:10 |
| C. Geekie | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7:00 | 0:00 |
| A. Cirelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4:37 | 0:00 |
| V. Hedman | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24:24 | 6:09 |
| R. McDonagh | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 19:19 | 0:00 |
| J. Moser | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 21:52 | 0:00 |
| D. Raddysh | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 18:41 | 0:49 |
| E. Lilleberg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:20 | 0:23 |
| E. Cernak | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:22 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Vasilevskiy | 25 | 23 | 2 | .920 | 59:50 | Win |
| J. Johansson | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Suter | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 19:39 | 2:20 |
| K. Sherwood | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:54 | 2:13 |
| A. Räty | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 9:22 | 0:00 |
| C. Garland | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 20:26 | 3:53 |
| E. Pettersson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 19:15 | 3:24 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 19:03 | 2:41 |
| B. Boeser | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 17:47 | 3:29 |
| T. Blueger | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 15:33 | 0:14 |
| D. Joshua | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:02 | 3:06 |
| N. Hoglander | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:42 | 0:16 |
| D. Heinen | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:26 | 0:03 |
| M. Sasson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:34 | 0:00 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | +2 | 0 | 23:12 | 1:58 |
| Q. Hughes | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:18 | 1:37 |
| C. Soucy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:31 | 1:19 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:28 | 0:00 |
| V. Desharnais | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 15:39 | 0:17 |
| E. Brannstrom | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14:41 | 3:10 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Lankinen | 32 | 29 | 3 | .906 | 58:12 | Loss |
| T. Demko | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | TBL 3.2, VAN 3.2 | TBL 4, VAN 2 |
| Total goals | 6.4 | 6 |
| Shots on goal | TBL 27.6, VAN 27.2 | TBL 33, VAN 25 |
| Win chance | TBL 50% | TBL won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL N. Kucherov | 3.0 | 4 | 1.43 | 3 | 32% | 1 |
| TBL J. Guentzel | 2.9 | 4 | 0.99 | 1 | 34% | 1 |
| VAN C. Garland | 2.7 | 2 | 0.86 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| VAN Q. Hughes | 2.5 | 4 | 1.07 | 1 | 14% | 1 |
| TBL B. Hagel | 2.4 | 5 | 1.01 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 2.4 | 5 | 0.76 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| TBL B. Point | 2.4 | 3 | 1.01 | 4 | 37% | 2 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 2.2 | 0 | 1.03 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 2.2 | 1 | 0.82 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| TBL V. Hedman | 1.9 | 2 | 0.73 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN P. Suter | 1.9 | 1 | 0.53 | 1 | 23% | 0 |
| VAN K. Sherwood | 1.8 | 4 | 0.52 | 1 | 20% | 1 |
| TBL M. Eyssimont | 1.8 | 2 | 0.26 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| TBL A. Cirelli | 1.8 | 2 | 0.66 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| TBL N. Paul | 1.7 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| TBL C. Geekie | 1.3 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| VAN D. Heinen | 1.2 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| VAN T. Blueger | 1.2 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| VAN T. Myers | 1.2 | 1 | 0.29 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN C. Soucy | 1.1 | 1 | 0.24 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| TBL Z. Girgensons | 1.1 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| VAN N. Hoglander | 1.1 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| VAN E. Brannstrom | 1.0 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL M. Chaffee | 1.0 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| VAN D. Joshua | 1.0 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| TBL D. Raddysh | 1.0 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL G. Goncalves | 0.9 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| TBL R. McDonagh | 0.9 | 3 | 0.29 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL J. Moser | 0.8 | 2 | 0.26 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| VAN A. Räty | 0.7 | 0 | 0.20 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| TBL E. Cernak | 0.7 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| TBL L. Glendening | 0.7 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| TBL E. Lilleberg | 0.7 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| VAN N. Juulsen | 0.7 | 1 | 0.12 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| VAN M. Sasson | 0.6 | 2 | 0.29 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| VAN V. Desharnais | 0.6 | 1 | 0.14 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.