Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
TBL4
FinalSun, Dec 8, 2024Every game that night
VAN2

TBL beat VAN 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.66 expected goals to 2.73. TBL outshot VAN 33 to 25. B. Point led the way with 4 points (2 G, 2 A). J. DeBrusk had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 2.4. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 23 of 25.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
TBL0224
VAN1012
  1. 1st 16:08VANQ. Hughes0.04 xG
  2. 2nd 4:40TBLN. Kucherov0.07 xG
  3. 2nd 6:29TBLB. PointPP0.06 xG
  4. 3rd 4:52VANK. Sherwood0.18 xG
  5. 3rd 16:04TBLJ. GuentzelPP0.25 xG
  6. 3rd 19:42TBLB. PointEN0.87 xG

Team Stats

TBLVAN
33Shots on goal25
4.66Expected goals2.73
61Shot attempts48
195v5 shots on goal20
2/4Power play0/3
9Hits28
11Blocked shots17
6Penalty minutes6
23Giveaways10
3Takeaways2

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

TBL 4.66 xGVAN 2.73 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdVAN goal, 16:08TBL goal, 4:40TBL goal, 6:29VAN goal, 4:52TBL goal, 16:04TBL goal, 19:42

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

TBL31 on goal, 4 scored
VAN24 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

TBL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. PointC224300+1022:077:06
N. KucherovRW123401+1022:437:16
J. GuentzelC101402-1023:157:13
B. HagelLW000540+1423:397:11
N. PaulLW000201-1018:590:03
Z. GirgensonsC000111-1013:010:00
L. GlendeningC0000010012:580:00
M. ChaffeeRW0002000012:400:00
M. EyssimontC0002200011:290:00
G. GoncalvesC000000008:440:10
C. GeekieC000100027:000:00
A. CirelliC000200004:370:00
V. HedmanD0112000024:246:09
R. McDonaghD011302+1019:190:00
J. MoserD000201+1021:520:00
D. RaddyshD000011-2018:410:49
E. LillebergD0000000016:200:23
E. CernakD0000110012:220:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Vasilevskiy25232.92059:50Win
J. Johansson000–0:00

VAN Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
P. SuterC0111010219:392:20
K. SherwoodLW101470+1014:542:13
A. RätyC011020+109:220:00
C. GarlandRW0002110220:263:53
E. PetterssonC000000-2019:153:24
J. DeBruskLW000502-2019:032:41
B. BoeserRW000120-2017:473:29
T. BluegerC000033+1015:330:14
D. JoshuaC000040+1013:023:06
N. HoglanderLW0001000010:420:16
D. HeinenLW0000100010:260:03
M. SassonC000200009:340:00
T. MyersD011124+2023:121:58
Q. HughesD101400+1020:181:37
C. SoucyD0001110022:311:19
N. JuulsenD000131-1018:280:00
V. DesharnaisD000120-1215:390:17
E. BrannstromD0001040014:413:10
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
K. Lankinen32293.90658:12Loss
T. Demko000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreTBL 3.2, VAN 3.2TBL 4, VAN 2
Total goals6.46
Shots on goalTBL 27.6, VAN 27.2TBL 33, VAN 25
Win chanceTBL 50%TBL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
TBL N. Kucherov3.041.43332%1
TBL J. Guentzel2.940.99134%1
VAN C. Garland2.720.86028%0
VAN Q. Hughes2.541.07114%1
TBL B. Hagel2.451.01031%0
VAN J. DeBrusk2.450.76031%0
TBL B. Point2.431.01437%2
VAN E. Pettersson2.201.03032%0
VAN B. Boeser2.210.82030%0
TBL V. Hedman1.920.73114%0
VAN P. Suter1.910.53123%0
VAN K. Sherwood1.840.52120%1
TBL M. Eyssimont1.820.26011%0
TBL A. Cirelli1.820.66022%0
TBL N. Paul1.720.50020%0
TBL C. Geekie1.310.37015%0
VAN D. Heinen1.200.42017%0
VAN T. Blueger1.200.40012%0
VAN T. Myers1.210.2914%0
VAN C. Soucy1.110.2408%0
TBL Z. Girgensons1.110.21010%0
VAN N. Hoglander1.110.30015%0
VAN E. Brannstrom1.010.2604%0
TBL M. Chaffee1.020.33015%0
VAN D. Joshua1.000.45019%0
TBL D. Raddysh1.000.2706%0
TBL G. Goncalves0.900.20011%0
TBL R. McDonagh0.930.2914%0
TBL J. Moser0.820.2607%0
VAN A. Räty0.700.20111%0
TBL E. Cernak0.700.2003%0
TBL L. Glendening0.700.1308%0
TBL E. Lilleberg0.700.1802%0
VAN N. Juulsen0.710.1203%0
VAN M. Sasson0.620.2909%0
VAN V. Desharnais0.610.1402%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.