TOR beat PHI 5-2, with the chances close: 3.38 expected goals to 2.96. N. Robertson led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). N. Cates had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.7. A. Stolarz stopped 31 of 33.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| PHI | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
- 1st 1:09PHIC. Dvorak0.17 xG
- 1st 6:16TORA. Matthews0.07 xG
- 2nd 8:14TORJ. McCabe0.02 xG
- 2nd 17:34TORN. Robertson0.08 xG
- 3rd 0:33TORE. Cowan0.09 xG
- 3rd 16:08PHIT. FoersterPP0.15 xG
- 3rd 19:42TORC. JarnkrokEN0.63 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
TOR 3.38 xGPHI 2.96 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
TOR Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Tavares | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:01 | 3:51 |
| N. Robertson | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 15:20 | 2:00 |
| A. Matthews | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 20:19 | 4:01 |
| M. Knies | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 20:04 | 3:56 |
| D. Joshua | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +2 | 0 | 14:28 | 0:09 |
| M. Maccelli | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:45 | 1:50 |
| E. Cowan | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:39 | 2:30 |
| C. Jarnkrok | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 11:08 | 0:09 |
| N. Roy | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:51 | 0:55 |
| M. Domi | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12:14 | 3:09 |
| B. McMann | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:43 | 0:29 |
| S. Blais | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10:09 | 0:39 |
| S. Benoit | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | +1 | 2 | 21:02 | 0:00 |
| M. Rielly | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:57 | 3:30 |
| J. McCabe | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 2 | 18:25 | 0:24 |
| C. Tanev | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 14:50 | 0:11 |
| B. Carlo | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | +2 | 0 | 24:00 | 0:11 |
| O. Ekman-Larsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 16:48 | 2:06 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Stolarz | 33 | 31 | 2 | .939 | 60:00 | Win |
| C. Primeau | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Dvorak | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:39 | 4:55 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 20:25 | 6:18 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 4 | 18:40 | 5:58 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:17 | 5:17 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -3 | 2 | 15:52 | 5:52 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:44 | 0:02 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 17:08 | 4:52 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:27 | 5:09 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 16:05 | 4:12 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:21 | 0:01 |
| J. Gaucher | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:09 | 0:06 |
| R. Abols | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:08 | 0:04 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 0 | 24:07 | 2:09 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 23:59 | 3:59 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:08 | 4:15 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 16:58 | 0:02 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:16 | 0:01 |
| E. Zamula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:23 | 0:01 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Vladar | 19 | 15 | 4 | .789 | 40:33 | Loss |
| A. Kolosov | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1.000 | 15:41 |
Lines at 5-on-5
TOR
PHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | TOR 3.3, PHI 2.8 | TOR 5, PHI 2 |
| Total goals | 6.1 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | TOR 25.7, PHI 26.9 | TOR 27, PHI 33 |
| Win chance | TOR 57% | TOR won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR A. Matthews | 3.8 | 5 | 1.16 | 1 | 45% | 1 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.8 | 2 | 0.61 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| TOR J. Tavares | 2.5 | 4 | 0.86 | 2 | 32% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.3 | 2 | 0.70 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.3 | 2 | 0.81 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| TOR M. Knies | 2.1 | 0 | 0.80 | 1 | 29% | 0 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 2.1 | 2 | 0.60 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| TOR B. McMann | 2.0 | 1 | 0.45 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 1.9 | 5 | 0.71 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| TOR N. Robertson | 1.7 | 1 | 0.41 | 2 | 20% | 1 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.7 | 5 | 0.55 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.7 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| TOR M. Rielly | 1.6 | 1 | 0.64 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.6 | 3 | 0.59 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.3 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| TOR M. Maccelli | 1.3 | 1 | 0.47 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| TOR E. Cowan | 1.3 | 4 | 0.38 | 1 | 12% | 1 |
| TOR M. Domi | 1.3 | 3 | 0.47 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.3 | 2 | 0.43 | 1 | 15% | 1 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.3 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| TOR O. Ekman-Larsson | 1.3 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| TOR N. Roy | 1.2 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.2 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI R. Abols | 1.1 | 3 | 0.20 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| TOR B. Carlo | 1.1 | 2 | 0.19 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| TOR D. Joshua | 1.0 | 0 | 0.34 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| TOR J. McCabe | 0.9 | 2 | 0.35 | 1 | 6% | 1 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.9 | 2 | 0.21 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| TOR C. Jarnkrok | 0.9 | 1 | 0.29 | 1 | 13% | 1 |
| TOR S. Blais | 0.8 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| TOR S. Benoit | 0.7 | 0 | 0.14 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.6 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| PHI E. Zamula | 0.6 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TOR C. Tanev | 0.5 | 0 | 0.20 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.4 | 0 | 0.14 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 20 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.